<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[I lost the game.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rusty shackleford]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 29th 2009 5:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[Shouldn't it be called the N450?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 29th 2009 9:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[11 1/2 hours of battery life. Yeah I believe that when my shit turns purple and smells like rainbow scherbert.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[schmidtdustin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 29th 2009 6:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[@schmidt1985 Considering the Asus Eee PC 1005PE running the same processor got over 10.5 hours of battery life in Engadget's review, maybe you want to take back your idiotic comment.<br><br><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/21/asus-eee-pc-1005pe-review/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/21/asus-eee-pc-1005pe-review/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 29th 2009 6:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[@schmidt1985 <br><br>I thought it did already...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GeneralRoderick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 29th 2009 6:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jafoman  <br>Yeah, just like my macbook pro gets 7 hours of battery. If you believe that your the idiot.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[schmidtdustin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 29th 2009 6:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[@schmidt1985  <br><br>It does get 7 hours, if you don't do anything with it after you unplug it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[daytripper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 29th 2009 7:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[@schmidt1985  You're so full of fail. My 1008HA gets a good 6hrs and 40 minutes, though advertised as 8.5. If the N220 gets about 9 or 10, not advertised, who gives a shit? Because it still gets in a full day of computing. Enjoy your shit sherbet. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 29th 2009 8:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[@schmidt1985 I guess you're saying Engadget's reviews are full of shit.  Why do you even visit this website?  To troll?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 29th 2009 9:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[@schmidt1985 <br>I've got a sammy n140 and it does do 11 hours of battery on standard use. Although it gives a mere 8 hours when having multiple programs and an antivirus running. So I'll believe that the battery is this good.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ebzy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 29th 2009 10:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ebzy  <br>Just to prove my point you are not getting what they rated it at? Again its not different then charter selling me 16MB internet when in REAL LIFE I get at best half of that. I just want specs to be honest. If you have to have your computers screen turned all the way down, not have apps open, and not use WIFI to get those results then the battery life just mean anything.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[schmidtdustin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2009 11:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[@N900  <br>Again not what the specs are saying thanks for proving my point like most everyone else that is bashing me. I want HONEST specs and pricing. If the average consuming isn't getting close to what is said on the box then eventually they are going to stop believing you. Stop with the high school drama and put some points out there. All calling someone name is doing is making you look more childish.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[schmidtdustin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2009 11:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[@schmidt1985  <br>And yes I can't type or spell want to make some more fun of me? LOL bring it on. At least a real man can admit his problems.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[schmidtdustin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2009 11:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just  don't see this generation of netbooks succeeding, not with the large list of new ULV processors in notebooks for 50 dollars more, and not with a barely bumped up increase in performance. <br><br>But i think Netbooks might find a niche in the small segment of the market that would sacrifice, power for a few more hours than ULV's, and still want a low cost. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[westell220]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 29th 2009 6:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[@westell220 <br><br>Wow, fascinating theory. Never heard anything quite like it...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Parias]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 29th 2009 7:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[As above, everyone seems to have forgotten the purpose of netbooks - to be cheap. Getting the price down rather than increasing features should be the emphasis.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kiran_mk2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 29th 2009 6:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[Weren't netbooks supposed to be way south of $500 (around $350)? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[daytripper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 29th 2009 7:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[@daytripper Agreed.  I think $300 - $350 should be at the high end $250 - $299 mid range, and $146 - $249 lower end (yes they make $146 netbooks with decent specs ->( <a href="http://laptops.techfresh.net/aojies-cheapest-10-inch-netbooks-introduced/" rel="nofollow">http://laptops.techfresh.net/aojies-cheapest-10-inch-netbooks-introduced/</a> )]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WhatGeeksDotCom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 29th 2009 7:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[@WhatGeeksDotCom  <br>Yeah, I would understand if for $500 you would get a better cpu (this atom seems like an n270-80 rehash) and Ion. This thing still has 1 gig of ram for pete's sake. <br><br>If they knew Pine Trail's gpu sucks ass then what's the point of releasing it. If it's to save more power then that makes sense, but if you need to rely on a 3rd party vendor to do 1080p isn't that a catch 22 (you need extra power to run the chip)? My guess is that Pine Trail was created to cock block Ion.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[daytripper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 29th 2009 8:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[350€ means it'll cost $350 in the US, not $500. There's pretty much always a 1:1 ratio for electronics.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CommentsTroll]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 29th 2009 7:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[the background color of this page is white]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hoho2200294]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 29th 2009 8:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[Intel graphics sucks donkey balls.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BigD145]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 29th 2009 8:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[sucks donkey kong's balls?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hoho2200294]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 29th 2009 8:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Pine Trail-boasting N220 netbook spied in France]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-pinetrail-boasting-n220-netbook-spied-in-france/</guid><description><![CDATA[If it does what it's supposed to, it really doesn't matter, does it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Forcelord50]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 30th 2009 4:08AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
