<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Engadget's top posts, 2009</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Engadget's top posts, 2009</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[Long live Engadget!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MicrosoftPwnsU]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wrong translation there Teslanaut.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@revoltracers <br><br>HAPPY NEW YEAR!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AJ in the East Bay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@aubreyq  Happy New Year Everyone. May 2010 bring us some all new, kick-ass devices for all! =)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@N900  <br>Whats coming in May?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joebob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@revoltracers Happy New Year Engadget Community !!! What better New Year Gift for us than CES next week !!!! Wooo Hooo !!!<br><br>Let this be the year of the 1 GHz + processors, the capacitive touchscreens, Windows Mobile 7, Android Muffin, and... and... 4G !!!!!! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tikiteko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@revoltracers Another amazing year, Engadget! Keep it up! You're numero uno!<br><br>Thanks for staying classy and not being insane like that other blog that starts with giz... What the heck is with the yearly round up there?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nerdtalker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 1:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@revoltracers<br><br>lol "We know this list is Apple heavy. We blame you guys." well played.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ajay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 1:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[LONG LIVE ENGADGET!<br><br>DOWN WITH MONSTER CABLE!<br><br><br><br><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/17/engadget-endorses-monster-cable-uh-hell-no/2" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/17/engadget-endorses-monster-cable-uh-hell-no/2</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aguiluz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 2:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[My favourite post is by far the one about MS's photoshopping skills<br><br>Engadget - thanks for another great year! A quick suggestion: can we also have the ability to view a comment's ranking in the Engadget App please? Other than that, great stuff!!! Looking forward to your coverage on 26th Jan! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LordFarkward]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 3:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@aubreyq<br><br>Hoppy New Beer!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 10:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[Gotta love Engadget!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[viralspace]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 2:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@revoltracers <br><br>Have to admit, this list sucks pretty bad. Top 5 are apple related, are you kidding me? 3 of those don't even matter that much. I consider windows 7 much more important than most of them. The two other windows 7 related posts are basically the same thing, get rod of one. Also, a modern warefare 2 post made it on there? Considering what a shitty game it was, even if it did come with night vision goggles(which got a pretty crappy review), doesn't even deserved to be number 50. Then again, two similar palm pre posts...really? Come on engandget, get your shit together.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[God]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2010 3:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's pretty clear why Engadget has so many Apple posts.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Don Goyo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2010 2:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[Irony: top five are Apple related. Goes to show that maybe not only Engadget is biased, but also the readers!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Avaviel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Avaviel <br>You never noticed all posts about apple have 700+ comments? Makes you wonder if they aren't making them to bind people to the site, there is a risk they might do that, it's so dead easy.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Avaviel <br>Don't forget how many of those hits come from anti-Apple readers who click on those pages simply to write comments about how much they hate Apple.<br><br>(Not to mention, live-blogs are refreshed multiple times by each reader during the course of the event, as new minute-by-minute information is posted.)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jasmine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ok, biased is the wrong word. "Look, lots of people are interested in Apple!" That better?<br><br>Oh, and I have a friend named Jasmine, but I don't think you are her.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Avaviel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Avaviel No. Comments like yours only show that some people just can't stand seeing Apple succeed where others fail. If you haven't noticed, the list is titled "most trafficked posts." That means it is the readers who are choosing to click on the post. How is Engadget biased? Oh that's right, Engadget is not supposed to talk about Apple right? You can go pound sand at microsoft.com all 2010.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[[Highest Ranked]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Avaviel  Stop causing flamewars, man. Leave all that shit back in 2009.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@N900  Totally agree. Let 2010 be the Year where a Mac Fan, an Android Fan, a Windows Fan, a BlackBerry Fan and a Pal Fan can all come to the same blog and discuss at ease without the flamewars. <br><br>Let 2010 be Macrisodroiprerrilicious !!! We know this year will certainly bring many many many terrific devices and technologies to make us all go into nerdgasm. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tikiteko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TikiTeko  <br>Seriously. Gadget geeks need to stop taking sides and just enjoy the buffet (nay, smorgasbord) of innovative and different products that the last decade brought us.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jasmine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[Irony: I was trying to point out that people are interested in Apple. Not start a flame war. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Avaviel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jupigare  <br><br>That defies human nature. Everyone picks sides, whether they'd like to admit it or not.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DPolski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 1:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA["$38,204.57 - Retail value of stuff we gave away to readers"<br><br><br>All I can say is...Damn.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jasmine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jupigare <br><br>Agreed. Some of that will be mine 2010. BUAHAHAHAH.<br><br>Seriously though, one thing I would love to see in the new year is more reviews, especially like the one's for the Droid with the second opinions from different users. I really appreciated those.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iThinkYourStupid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 1:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jupigare <br>$0.00: The retail value of what JW received from Engadget.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[redleader158]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 1:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[I like how it says "11:59"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cris T]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[happy new year engadget readers ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jay jay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@saturnblackhole <br>Even though I'm in California and still have three hours of 2009 left, Happy New Year!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jasmine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[You guys getting rid of Times New Roman anytime soon?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BubbaD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@iStepOnU Yeah, it's gone already.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[ahh yes, the irony. Nice job Engadget lets have a great 2010<br><br>btw am i the only one excited for CES! I CANT WAIT!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rinum009]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@iStepOnU Use this script to restore the font:<br><a href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/62407" rel="nofollow">http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/62407</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[X-BLADE]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Joshua Topolsky  can you make the comments editable? at least for the 1st 5 minutes after post.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[[Highest Ranked]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Rinum009  I am very excited about CES and even more now than Engadget is the Official Blog !]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tikiteko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Hosain  <br>Hey, I'm an idiot. How do I get execute (?) the source code so it will "clean" up the site?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DPolski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 1:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Creativity  <br>If you use Firefox, you can use Greasemonkey to install the script: <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/748" rel="nofollow">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/748</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jasmine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 2:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[Woohoo for not having a life, being on engadget within minutes of the new year! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[B3astofthe3ast]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[Happy New Year Engadget.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fromtheyear]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[Talking of 2009, I hear patrick stewart (aka cpt picard) got a knighthood for services to drama in the new-year honors list<br>In other words he got knighted for facepalm, obviously since facepalm defined the decade :)<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looking at the list, Thats a lot of apple posts]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OCEAN CLAK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[38,000? Wow, engadget, you're rich! I think it's finally time to turn off my adblock... Just to support you.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AndroidRokz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AndroidRokz <br><br>They gave away stuff they were given for free, not stuff they paid for.<br><br>Love the irony of all the "top posts" being AAPL @zz-kissing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Warner.dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dwboston1  as stated earlier:<br>...the list is titled "most trafficked posts." That means it is the readers who are choosing to click on the post. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[[Highest Ranked]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple takes 7 of the 20 highest ranked posts of the year in Engadget. Good stuff!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[[Highest Ranked]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@HighestRanked <br>Apple-related articles took 4 spots out of 10 in Gizmodo's Best 10 of '09<br><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5437856/top-10-most-popular-articles-of-2009?skyline=true&s=x" rel="nofollow">http://gizmodo.com/5437856/top-10-most-popular-articles-of-2009?skyline=true&s=x</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[[Highest Ranked]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 12:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@HighestRanked You realize these aren't ranked by us, right? This is based on the amount of pageviews the posts get. Which means (in essence) how many times people clicked to the story. AKA, how many times the readers of the site looked at that post.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 2:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Joshua Topolsky  <br>Yes I'm fully aware, and that's why it's nice to see readers are so interested in Apple.<br><br>Anyway, what's poor Laura doing adding posts at 1AM on January 1st? the poor girl should be enjoying the holidays not posting stuff about chinese e-readers:<br><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/01/owen-e1-e-reader-gets-outed-for-chinese-reading-public/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/01/owen-e1-e-reader-gets-outed-for-chinese-reading-public/</a><br>"By Laura June posted Jan 1st 2010 1:02AM"<br><br>Let her have a good time!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[[Highest Ranked]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 2:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget's top posts, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/31/engadgets-top-posts-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Joshua Topolsky<br><br>Hmm, all the live events were on top...  You guys don't count refreshes as hits do you? ;)<br><br>Happy New Year, all!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[erik1080]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 2:30AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
