<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[Do want! :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jayayess1190]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 1:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jayayess1190 How fast are they? Really fast, obviously, and apparently totally worth the upgrade. Clarkdale is fastest that anything dual core out there, while both mobile chips are faster than their Core 2 Duo counterparts, with the extra performance having no impact on the battery life. <br><br>Imagine combining a GPU and a CPU in one processor? Z-omg: More details: <a href="http://bit.ly/arrandale-clarkdale-indepth-details" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/arrandale-clarkdale-indepth-details</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[andreweback]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2010 10:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[Excellent!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jayayess1190]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 1:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[Should add the guru3d review as well.  <a href="http://www.guru3d.com/article/core-i5-650-660-661-review-test/" rel="nofollow">http://www.guru3d.com/article/core-i5-650-660-661-review-test/</a><br><br>Phenom II X4 965BE is a better buy look's like it for same or just few bucks more.  The over all system would be cheaper too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[v4nqu1sh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 1:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@v4npro this is true. AMD is still the best bang for the buck. Intel will have to severely drop their prices for me to convert. sorry but i am not spending twice as much money for 25% more performance.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kojo87]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 2:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kojo87<br><br>The AMD Phenom X4 965BE TDP is 125W.<br>The comparable Intel Core i5 660 TDP is 73W.<br><br>And the mobile Intels are half that again.<br><br>This is like P4 versus Athlon 64 all over again. No matter how cheap the chip is up front you're going to pay on the back end if you buy the chip which is burning through much more power.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[why not the LS2LS7?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 4:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@spin cycle  <br><br>At stock speeds yes, the i5 uses less power but who keeps it at stock speeds? 965BE is clocked at 3.4GHz.    So if you overclock the i5(which you can do easy over 3.4GHz) you won't see much price difference in power usage.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[v4nqu1sh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 1:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@spin cycle  <br><br>Intel and AMD define TDP at different ways:<br><a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/opinion/1050824/amd-talks-acp-vs-tdp" rel="nofollow">http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/opinion/1050824/amd-talks-acp-vs-tdp</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[idansof]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 5:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@spin cycle im running a Phenom II X4, 3 HDDs and 2 ATi  HD4870s off an 850W PSU. like i care about a 52W difference.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kojo87]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2010 12:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you see how many sites are NDA hookers you feel much better about using adblock..<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 1:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[I should have said "NDA whores" I guess, excuse me for soiling the terminology.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 1:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Wwhat  Why does holding an embargo for a product make someone an "NDA whore" exactly?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 1:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[They sign a non-disclosure agreement, then get the samples to test, just so they can release their article on the exact moment they are 'allowed' and get most visitors and most money from the ads because of high number of visitors.<br>And signing NDA papers and, your independance away, for money, well I think you get the drift right?<br>And once they are slaves of intel, since intel and other companies can refuse them the next time, doesn't it follow that they also make sure they aren't 'too negative about the boss'? Because what if intel takes you of the list of getting those pre-release samples and won't allow you to sign an NDA and your 'review' will be 2 weeks later when people aren't that interested anymore and all read NDA-'powered' sites already? When you lie down with dogs you wake up with fleas as the saying goes.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 1:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Wwhat  <br><br>Never thought of it that way. Intriguing. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Seven]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 3:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Wwhat  I see that you have never been in any of these positions before, otherwise you would have a different view.  Also, releasing things "at an exact moment" does NOT mean more readers than normal.  These sites would get 10x the traffic if they didn't all release at the same time.  <br><br>Keep in mind as well that engadget does get information under embargo as well to be released at specific times.  The entire industry works this way.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 1:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[So what passes for Hardcore games nowadays?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Teslanaut]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 1:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Teslanaut Crysis is still the game that taxes every piece of hardware thrown at it.  I would consider that Hardcore.  By comparison COD: Modern Warfare 2 is a light weight game as far as graphics go.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 5:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[Being nitpicky today: Pine Trail not Pine Trial.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 1:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Woodley <br>Hey, cut them some slack, it's a tricky word to type. I always get messed up with dose.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[daytripper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 2:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@daytripper  <br>Crap, I mean DOES.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[daytripper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 2:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@daytripper  Do you mean "those"?<br><br>Somehow I feel a simple word just whistled right over my head.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Johanu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 5:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[check the spelling in the link to the pine trail page guys.  it's not pine trial...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Homestar1217]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 1:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA["Benchmarked for your enjoyment" Always makes me feel a little dirty ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[alexicov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 1:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[i'm planning to buy a laptop. Should I wait for this one or go ahead and buy the intel core duo? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Smartmouth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 2:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@smartmouth <br>Wait for the i5/i3. Core 2 is history.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[daytripper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 2:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@smartmouth if you plan on doing video editing on your laptop - yes, wait.   If you are browsing the web and using outlook, excel, word etc - you won't notice any real change from a 2.6 or above Core2 vs an i5.   But remember Core Duo is really old - core 2 duo is relatively current.   BIG BIG difference between a Core Duo and a Core 2 Duo.<br><br>The battery life won't be of any signficance between the two processors either.   You might be able to get a discount in a month or two as some companies might phase out the current generation of Core 2 duoss on some models of laptops.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[boe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 9:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[Typo:<br>"most reviews found the CPU + GPU solution to be faster than ___rivaling____Core 2 Duo + integrated GPU options"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Maneki Neko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 2:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[Intel's integrated GPU still sucks, go figure.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[daytripper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 2:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@daytripper <br><br>All integrated graphics suck. <br><br>From Anandtech's Arrandale review:<br><br>"It's also nice to see integrated Intel graphics that don't suck… or at least, they only suck as bad as the current AMD and NVIDIA IGPs."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 2:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[32nm this fast? Nice. I didn't know that 32nm was gonna be bnchmarked so damn soon in 2010. Especially after reading a random article elsewhere that said no 32 in 2010<br><br>very nice to know this]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[IvanP91]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 2:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[That is the most beautiful heat spreader I have ever seen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ethana2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 2:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ethana2 <br>Then you must have not seen much. That thing is ugly as heck,]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mega-Japan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 5:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think Apple's Jan. 26th event is going to be the macbook lines getting these new chips in them..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[poematik14]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 2:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@poematik14 <br>I wouldn't hold my breath.<br><br><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5436465/whats-inside-the-next-macbooks" rel="nofollow">http://gizmodo.com/5436465/whats-inside-the-next-macbooks</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[daytripper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 2:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@poematik14 <br><br>Ya, I think so too. I hope they add more stuff or reduce hte price or something though because just the new chip isn't compelling enough. There is no reason for a laptop that sells for over a grand to not include a blu ray drive. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 3:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@poematik14 I can see the mobile Core i5/i7 series being in the next MacBook/MacBook Pro computers but not the Core i3 series.  <br><br>I would buy a new MacBook Pro tomorrow if Apple were to release one that used the Mobile Core i7 and ATI Radeon HD 5XXX mobility graphics.  Until then my Core2Duo/nVidia 8600M GT 17" MacBook Pro will have to do.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 6:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[nice!<br>From:<a href="http://www.discount-laptop-batteries.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.discount-laptop-batteries.co.uk</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ecsem2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 2:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not bad for the laptop chips. But on the desktop front, I don't think I would settle for a dual core anymore.<br><br>I can has $400 i7 puter?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pika2000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 3:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@pika2000 You probably can't find an i7 for that price, but i5 is 4 core and you might be able to do that for $400.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[why not the LS2LS7?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 4:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@spin cycle  Nope. Cheapest Core i5 desktop I could find was at least $700 (CPU only, no monitor, etc).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pika2000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 4:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not interested really. We are just a few months away from Core i7 980X - 6 core CPU that will smack these i3/5 clowns. :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 4:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[After reading a few of the linked articles I can say without a doubt that I am waiting for Gulftown, preferably in a Dual Socket LGA-1366 so that I can have 12 cores pushing 24 threads.  I can really care less about games and more about the amount of time waiting on Photoshop to finish applying filters to large image files.  It would be extremely nice to see more applications become highly multi threaded especially for transcoding video.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 6:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[Are ANY of these iCPU's Quad core? The chart at anandtech does not seem to point to that. For some reason I thought they were.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TZK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 7:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cant wait to get my hands on an i3 laptop. So far everything is positive :)<br>Def would like to see a ULV version of an i3 stuffed into a Vostro V13]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cg006]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 8:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Cg006 Intel launched the i7-640UM as their next mainstream ULV to replace the Core2Duo SU, but for some reason all of the Arrandale reviews dont mention it, they only focus on the i3/i5. I guess Intel is gonna ship the i7 review units later]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mtvis4luzers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 10:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Cg006 oh also there don't seem to be any plans of an i3 ULV, but there is an i5 ULV planned, the i5-520UM. though Intel's gonna be pushing the i7-640UM to OEMs much harder, hence thats probably all we're going to see for the most part]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mtvis4luzers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 11:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mtvis4luzers  <br><br>Wouldn't a Mobile i7 be ridiculously expensive? I just want something that packs a punch while not mugging my wallet. lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cg006]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 11:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Cg006  well no since its still the ULV version of i7 that I speak of. it only has 2 cpu cores clocked at 1.2ghz and 1 gpu core clocked at 500mhz. a full blown i7 has 4 cores. most analysts expect prices to be very comparable to current core2duo ULVs]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mtvis4luzers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 4:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[While the i5 offers some advantages if you do a lot of video editing on your laptop, it doesn't have enough of an upgrade at current speeds to make me want to replace my current core 2 laptop.   I guess when an i5-560m or i5-580m become available provided they don't draw too much more power I'll consider an upgrade.    The power difference between a 540m and my current Core 2 aren't of any note nor is the performance for boot up, office apps etc.   Hopefully they will allow for lighter laptops though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[boe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 9:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><description><![CDATA[Very nice!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dusty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2010 9:17AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
