http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/ Engadget Comments for Panasonic blows it out with 3D Blu-ray deck, HDTVs, channels and $21k camcorder http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/Jan 6th 2010 6:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/
ONE pair of glasses???]]>Jan 6th 2010 6:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/
I'm glad I'm not the only one wishing they would drop 3-D. Imagine having the family over for Christmas (14 in my case) and want to watch a movie... I am going to have to go out and buy 20 pairs of 3-D glasses just to entertain the family? They shouldnt even be thinking about 3-D until consumers don't have to have magic glasses for it to work]]>Jan 6th 2010 7:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/Then just play the movie back in 2D, problem solved.]]>Jan 6th 2010 7:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/I was at avatar and the guy next to me (he was about 21 years old) and he suggested they just put the polarized film over the whole screen

"and then we wouldn't have to wear these dumbs%#t glasses"]]>Jan 6th 2010 8:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/
I'm glad I'm not the only one wishing for 3-D. Imagine having the strippers over in Vegas (14 in my case) and want to watch a porno... I am going to have to go out and buy 20 pairs of 3-D glasses just to entertain the strippers? They should be thinking about 3-D without having to have magic glasses for it to work]]>Jan 6th 2010 11:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/
So an easy way to show people this, is to hold up your polarized glasses to the screen. Notice when you don't look through the lenses, you see a double image. Then when you look through either eye, you see a single image. Well what the guy didn't realize is that each of those lenses is filtering out a different image. So even though they look Awfully similar, they are different.

so now think of what it would take to project an image to each of your eyes separately, and to more than one person in a sweet spot in the room and you will understand why glasses are gonna be here for a while]]>Jan 7th 2010 12:38AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/Jan 10th 2010 10:16AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/Jan 6th 2010 6:34PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/Jan 6th 2010 6:37PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/Jan 7th 2010 12:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/
Oh and systems using polarized will undoubtedly cost more as they will require advanced screen tech.]]>Jan 7th 2010 12:40AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/
The thing I don't get from this posting, and people's response, is the complaining that only one pair of glasses is included. The glasses aren't free just because they come with the TV. If it comes with 5 pairs, you're paying for 5 pairs on top of the regular TV cost. I'd imagine that the 95% of people who don't immediately want to use 3D tech are going to be irritated that they paid extra for glasses they don't need, if anything.]]>Jan 7th 2010 1:33AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/Jan 8th 2010 8:23AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/Jan 6th 2010 6:42PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/Jan 6th 2010 6:42PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/Jan 6th 2010 6:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/
exactly what i was wondering. Anyone hear anything on that?]]>Jan 6th 2010 11:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/
http://playstationlifestyle.net/2010/01/05/sony-proves-to-be-3ds-biggest-supporter/]]>Jan 6th 2010 6:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/
Me, I'd be happy with a system that can get 120 fps to each eye. Having to pick between the buttery smoothness of 120 fps, and 60 fps 3D... it's painful. I'd rather just throw money at the problem for more graphics cards.]]>Jan 7th 2010 1:38AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/Jan 6th 2010 6:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/
depends on the tv. most home tvs are going to use active shutter technology, which will not be compatible with the glasses you get from the theater.]]>Jan 6th 2010 6:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/Jan 6th 2010 6:57PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/
That doesn't mean I don't want one.]]>Jan 6th 2010 6:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/I work in Digital Cinema, I guess I'm just used to it by now...
I'm totally in, btw. Where do I pay?]]>Jan 6th 2010 8:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/Jan 7th 2010 1:42AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/Jan 6th 2010 6:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/Jan 10th 2010 10:17AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/Jan 6th 2010 7:04PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/
er, for the film program]]>Jan 6th 2010 8:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/Jan 6th 2010 9:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/Jan 6th 2010 11:34PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-blows-it-out-with-3d-blu-ray-deck-hdtvs-channels-and/
Now, I thought they had perfected some kind of screen that could change polarization fast enough to flip it between frames, so that only cheap lightweight polarized glasses were necessary. I saw one TV (JVC perhaps) at SIGGRAPH that had each horizontal line alternately polarized, so each eye got full horizontal resolution but only half vertical.]]>Feb 9th 2010 7:01AM