<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[holy......]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PedoJokerBear [Planeteer | Power of Gall Bladder]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2010 9:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) Recession antidote please.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2010 9:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Full release after the break?<br><br>Sure, why not? We're in Vegas after all!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[E71]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2010 10:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[That tv is so wonderfully big....<br><br>I...<br>I have no words for it.<br><br>Its bigger than my bed! lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Drybones5]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2010 9:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Drybones5 Thats.. what she said..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[X-BLADE]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2010 9:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[How the heck do you ship and move this thing to your house.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2010 9:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified)<br><br>At least you know when your house get robbed, this tv isn't going anywhere.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aimran]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2010 9:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) <br>you build the house around it]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnTitor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2010 9:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Give me two of those...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Billy Gun]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2010 9:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) Talking about dual screen setup from hell!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[boolean22]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2010 9:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Meh - 4K just doesn't cut it any more when they've already got 8K in the pipeline.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AniMill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2010 9:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Damn! I thought the "4k" meant it was only $4000]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ckrames1234]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2010 9:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ckrames1234  I thought the same thing lol. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MaxDiablito]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2010 9:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why not create a 100metre dildo whilst they're at it. Who is this aimed at, multi zillionaires? They're being stupid.<br>If only Pioneer weren't halting the production on their TV's, Panasonic would quickly take their heads out of their arse.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dedparrot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2010 9:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dedparrot They're making these for the homeless folk who live in the streets, it'll keep them warm while giving them something to watch.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CerealBizness]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2010 9:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dedparrot It's for the sheikh of Dubai no doubt. He needs a TV that matches his 831m monstrosity of a skyscraper.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[r3loaded]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 3:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why are they showing a Video of a rafting team being mercilessly drowned?<br>Is that symbolic of the torrent of Debt that will surely slallow you up if you are insane enough to attempt to purchase this set without the phrase "CEO" or "Apple Shareholder" after your name?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Addyct]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2010 9:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[i want to go to there]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2010 9:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[In for 2.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[reallynotnick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2010 9:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Gee now all i need is a rollercoaster cart and the rollercoaster movie from IMAX on blueray and im set.<br>just hope i can get it  in my living room]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mr2dxtream]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2010 10:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[If it's just going to be 1080p I don't see the point for living room applications. You'll just be starting a bigger pixels at this point. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ypoknons]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2010 10:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[@YpoCaramel um, 4k]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rooshma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[do people just skim articles nowadays instead of reading it?  No wonder there's so many lawyers out there just to read the fine print... j/k]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xconan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[@xconan Ironically I am a law student. XD I do apologize, my mistake, I didn't know what 4K was. Generally I fact check, but I didn't even realize that 4K was a resolution. <br><br>I don't know what the law is in the US, but in the UK/Canada/Hong Kong etc... sphere if there's an 'unusual or onerous term' in the contract it should be specifically pointed out and made to stand out. Reading the fine print is important nevertheless, but the law is trying to ameliorate the pain for consumers. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ypoknons]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 2:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA["We imagine it'll look a lot like it's little brother pictured above"<br><br>Its, not it's.  You're a journalist, man, come on.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[skim1420]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2010 10:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[@skim1420 <br><br>Yep, and the irony is that in the first sentence, Ben used "its" when he meant "it's".  Plus there's the whole "then" that should be "than".<br><br>Unfortunately, being a journalist no longer seems to correlate with knowing how to use proper spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc.  Probably because people are always demanding free news, which necessitates budget reductions, which erodes the concept of "professional journalism".  That and the population at large either seems not to know or not to care about these types of distinctions anymore.  As far as they're (not "their" or "there") concerned, if people understand what they meant, who cares what they said.  Sigh.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 9:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd love to hook up a killawatt to this thing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ckent]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2010 11:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ckent  the kill-a-watt might display ITS OVER 9,000!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Illankid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 2:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[imagine watchin porn on this....... :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NokiaFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2010 11:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[@NokiaFan <br><br>What the hell, why is everyone obsessed with oversized penises? WTF man I don't wanna see a penis as big as my arm waving in front of me... tough i could do with some massive boobies!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[m1lt0n]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 7:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Am I the only one that's confused by all this? Has this already been addressed before?<br><br>Where is the 3D coming from, the content or the TV itself? Will we still need glasses to view the 3D or does the TV somehow magically display it? Have we actually come that far in technology now?<br><br>If we have to wear glasses, then how is this any different than the movies you can buy on Blueray right now and use the polarized glasses with it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kloan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kloan  glasses]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Illankid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 2:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kloan <br><br>Here's the breakdown:<br><br>3D content from cable, satellite, Blu-ray, or anywhere else will require a 3D TV as well as 3D glasses.  As you may know, there are two ways to display 3D content: light polarization and stereoscopic (i.e. quickly switching frames).  Those two formats require two separate types of glasses.  Glasses with light polarization filters are cheaper and unpowered, which is nice.  Glasses for stereoscopic 3D requires active shutter functionality, which means powered and therefore more expensive glasses, as well as a way for the glasses and the TV to communicate and stay in sync.<br><br>Good so far?  Ok, so in the theatres, the most common way to do 3D is to use light polarization.  The reason for that is that in the theatres, 3D is pulled off using two projectors, each of which has a different light polarization filter in front of it.  So what you end up with on the screen is two sets of images, each polarized differently.<br><br>The reason you can't do that with TVs at home is because (at least for now) the TV actually needs to GENERATE the image, whereas in the theatre the screen you're looking at is a reflection of two sources of light generated elsewhere.  TVs for now don't seem to be able to generate two images simultaneously that are each polarized differently, and if you think about it, that makes sense.  If a given spot on the screen could simultaneously be polarized two ways and displaying potentially different colors (due to differences in the images), then they would be considered two separate pixels.  Given you only have a 1080p display, that would mean each image would have lower resolution or you'd need a higher-res display.  So instead what's happening is 3D TVs are being given super-high refresh rates (480 Hz, apparently) that will allow them to switch images fast enough to work with active shutter glasses and not have to deal with light polarization.<br><br>I'm actually not sure how the existing 3D on Blu-ray works (like The Final Destination), but I would guess they're using the older version of 3D which used red and green lenses.  I don't remember the technical details on how the effect is created that way, but I do know it's the least effective of the 3, and I can also say for certain that in those cases the TOTAL resolution you're getting is still 1080p, whereas the new technology will allow 1080p image quality to go to each eye.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 9:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[hell yeah, get 4 of those and put one on each wall,then get multi controller and watch pron on one and like that. (then you would puke after doing that for 12h)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dyyz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 2:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[What will make a bigger difference THAN the extra two inches...<br>Fixed that for you...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Markus Jevring]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 3:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[shame its plasma and not LED backlight LCD. Wonder how much power it uses?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 4:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) <br><br>Shame from an energy standpoint, but definitely not from an image quality one, which let's face it, will take priority over energy savings for anyone with enough cash to buy this thing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 3:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[man for the price of this thing ill buy one of those 75 inch 3d displays that require no glasses. While setting up the best buy Mexico store i did have time to play with the 103 in display. Very cool guess ill have to take the front doors down to get the 152in bad boy in the house though. Cant wait till those oled screens that will come out that you just paint on the wall. then 150 in wont be anything.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 4:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[No mention does this support hdmi 1.4]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 4:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you can pay for this tv...you can pay for a 4K 3D projector...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[2020AudioVisual]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 4:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder when 3D 4k Movies will come out...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nubee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 6:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Too bad HDMI 1.4 supports only either 3D or 4K, but not 4K in 3D. Tops out at 1080p 3D or 4K 2D.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian Wolff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 4:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[HUGE! :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dusty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 10:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[NBC has control of 1 of the first  produced. They wanted one for the Vancouver Olympics.  They requested 2 of them, 1 as a back up and probably got laughed at.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JoeSmoe23]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[<br>NBC has one  of the 152" for the Vancouver Olympics. They ordered 2, 1 as a backup and they probably got laughed at.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JoeSmoe23]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[NBC has one  of the 152" for the Vancouver Olympics. They ordered 2, 1 as a backup and they probably got laughed at.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JoeSmoe23]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[My only question: does it come with a good defective-pixel policy ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan R.-B.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 5:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic does it again, introduces 152-inch 3D 4k HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/panasonic-does-it-again-introduces-152-inch-3d-4k-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Did I miss the Cost?   I wonder how much?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[istealth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 11:17AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
