<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[WQHD?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eraser]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Eraser<br><br>Wide Quad High-Definition?  If so, it's pretty presumptuous especially since, you know, most people don't consider 1280x720 (which what this is four of) to be the be-all and end-all of "High-Definition".<br><br>Now, 3840x2160 would a proper "WQHD". :-P  I could really get behind that screen resolution.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[old_fogie_late_bloomer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Eraser <br>2560x1440 would be classified under WQXGA]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 8:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Old fogie late bloomer  <br><br>Not quite WQHD, but IBM did WQUXGA (3840×2400 pixels) back in 2001. At 22-inch and 206 PPI, it costed 18 grand when it launched (microscope not included).<br><br>IBM T220/T221 LCD monitors - <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_T220/T221_LCD_monitors" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_T220/T221_LCD_monitors</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Blurrycam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 10th 2010 5:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hawt]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[This and a 27 i7 iMac for a perfect pair, 7.4 Megapixels of visual canvas.  <br><br>WANT<br><br>Too bad Jay Z is selling his DOA versions of the iMac, I'm not so much of a fan.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jamesstringer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[Want...<br><br>...a coupon first.<br><br>As for the term, I think Dell just made it up.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pbdye]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@pbdye <br>I think so too, because the most reliable source ever*, wikipedia, doesn't have anything on WQHD.<br><br><br><br>*Not really.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[collindow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@pbdye <br><br>Oh god yes, I so WANT this monitor and I NEED a coupon.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow. Want.<br><br>I need to upgrade from my Dell 2005FPW.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Einhanderkiller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@einhanderkiller Don't. Keep the 2005FPW alongside, at least.<br>The 2005FPW is a god among monitors.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevlar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 10th 2010 3:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[is 27in big enough or will the pixel density be too much? I am getting old now and my sight is not 20/10 anymore...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JayC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@chodaboy19 <br>Umm...this is a argument that many people make against a high res/high ppi monitor. It's pointless. You can increase icon size or text size if your vision isn't that great...or get glasses.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[quiksilv3r]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@chodaboy19 It's the same pixel density as the new 27" iMac, which isn't any harder to read than a 13" Macbook.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@chodaboy19 I think it will definitely have too much resolution - it will average 109dpi assuming it is 16:9, and that is the highest I've seen in large monitors.<br><br>I use dual 27" Dell's now, specifically to get the lower resolution.<br><br>Attempting to increase font sizes and icon sizes really doesn't work well in Windows and lots of other contexts. Too much software breaks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NetMage]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 6:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[What keyboard is that?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gregwilker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@gregwilker, Microsofts new one. Oh so sexy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Templarian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@gregwilker This one: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/16/microsoft-bluetooth-mobile-keyboard-6000-the-perfect-travel-key/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/16/microsoft-bluetooth-mobile-keyboard-6000-the-perfect-travel-key/</a><br><br>It's definitely awesome.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 2:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[27" at 2560x1440? Wonder why they did that. HMMMMMM]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jellotime91 Well, the Cinema HD Display 30" is only a bit bigger and has the same horizontal resoultion.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MicrosoftPwnsU]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@revoltracers  yes because until Apple introduced the iMac 27" there was no monitor lower than 30" that had this resolution!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jellotime91  <br><br>Don't be an idiot. It's not as though Apple set a trend with the 27" 2560x1440. Monitor makers like Apple and Dell use whatever the LCD panel makers choose to make. It's not "OMG DELL COPY APPLE!!!11" It's that they HAVE to make monitors at that size and res because that's what the panel is!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kkl1014]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kkl1014  <br><br>You took the words right out of my mouth. <br><br>@ jellotime91 <br><br>Take time to research and you wont sound like an idiot when you say "Apple introduced the iMac 27" there was no monitor lower than 30" that had this resolution!"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EminiSP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kkl1014  except that the 27" iMac is an LED display... not LCD.<br>So it's not the same panel. :/]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jellotime91  <br><br>You are a moron.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jellotime91 <br><br>It is called aspect ratio. <br><br>480/270 = 1.777777...<br>1280/720 = 1.777777...<br>1920/1080 = 1.777777...<br>2560/1440 = 1.777777...<br><br>1280x720 X 2 = 2560x1440<br><br>Wonder why Apple copied that. HMMMMM?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NohOne1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jellotime91  Rather than dissing you, I'll explain:<br><br>They're both LCD panels. The difference is in the backlighting. The LED in the iMac is LED backlighting that goes behind and lights up the LCD panel, whilst in the U2711 it is probably some kind of CCFL. The LED backlight is more environmentally friendly, I think, but otherwise at this level of monitors it should be more or less the same performance-wise. <br><br>Niether of these monitors use LEDs for the panel.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ypoknons]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 2:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jellotime91  <br>At least when the 27" dell monitor turns up, rest of the computer will still work.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spaz_1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 2:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@NohOne1  And this means what?  You can do simple math?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[appliance]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 5:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kkl1014  If they were the first to do it, by definition they set the trend.  so what's your point?  Don't hurt yourself it's not really a question.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[appliance]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 6:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@eminisp  where's your research?  Did you google ,"nasty gasbag"- wrong search.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[appliance]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 6:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@NohOne1  <br>Dude,  don't show math to fashion design major.  Their head might explode.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[max1001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 9:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@appliance  <br><br>What?!?!? You sound like an idiot also when you say "where's your research? Did you google ,"nasty gasbag"- wrong search." STFU]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EminiSP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 11:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jellotime91  <br>That comment was so stupid, I automatically assumed it was sarcasm. Haha]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[capitalpm71]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 10th 2010 4:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't not understand what this obsession with a microscopic bezel is. I don't know anyone else, but I actually like having something to grasp onto. I mean the bezel on the new Smartbook from Lenovo could be an example of unnecessary bezel size, but really Engadget? THIS is an example of a "bezel done wrong?" I think you need to stop caring so much about minute aesthetics. Especially since this bezel isn't even that large.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Solidstate89]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Solidstate89 I thought that bezel was pretty thin. What are Engadget comparing it to?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MicrosoftPwnsU]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@revoltracers  <br>Your guess is as good as mine, but apparently there's something just monstrously ugly about that bezel.<br><br>*shrugs*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Solidstate89]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Solidstate89 It matters more in this case because professionals love to dual monitor these and the smaller the black bar between the screens the better. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ypoknons]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 2:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Solidstate89 <br>One word... Eyefinity]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kia]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 14th 2010 11:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[How on earth does that "sway you back into the single-monitor camp." I just want two of these.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@magic6435 My thoughts exactly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Carson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@magic6435 <br>Three in portrait?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kaotickelly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[No 16:10 form factor is a big loss, I never want a 16:9 monitor, even if it is 250x1440]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@eyean540 I thought I would feel that way...but as I'm working on one now, I don't miss it so much. Especially since the overall upgrade in size (from 24" to 27") is still a gain in vertical pixel count.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@eyean540<br><br>I'm kinda with you... I compromised and got a 1366x768 laptop, but I am still fonder of 16:10, and there's a 1920x1200 monitor sitting on my desk.<br><br>Then again, I'd take a 1920x1080 monitor over a 1680x1050 one, so whatever.  If you're gonna shell out for this one, though, why not go 30" and get the full 16:10 monty?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[old_fogie_late_bloomer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@eyean540 <br>+1. Years ago I can't understand why people around do not like fresh new 16:10 widescreen but stick to their old 4:3. Now, I am in the group hate the fresh new 16:9 and would love to find all the way down to the not that new 16:10. For WUXGA, 16:9 means 120 px lose on vertical or you may translate that number into 4 Vista taskbars or 3 Windows 7 taskbars!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rhino]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@eyean540 At least it's not 1920x1080. At least it has more pixels than 1920x1200. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ypoknons]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[@eyean540 <br><br>Just put your taskbar on the left side and you get pseudo16:10. Windows 7 and OS X are perfectly designed for this. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 10th 2010 5:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yep.  IPS weeeee.  $1K ooooookay.  Coupon mmhmmmmm.<br><br>Where can I get on the list?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gjennings]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/dell-goes-pro-with-27-inch-ultrasharp-u2711-wqhd-lcd-monitor-ha/</guid><description><![CDATA[Makes my 23-inch Dell look small...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Maccadude33]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:23AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
