<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[Video is set to private...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KingJustin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@KingJustin <br>Fail!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Biggs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@KingJustin <br>yup.... still waiting...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Myst3ry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@KingJustin : Pron vid]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[its...er...er...a...helicoptier! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@KingJustin <br>AMAZING>>> FLying cars here we come]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Don]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[so it comes with no remote?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@danhawk911<br>it does not]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bombos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@danhawk911 Who needs a remote when the source is free and all you need to control it is a WiFi enabled computer.  I have about four or five devices that should be able to control it already, especially my laptop.  By not including a remote they are making the AR Drone more affordable, which for me is a major selling point.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 7:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[CNET Live at CES is using screen grabs from Engadget in their stories.<br><a href="http://cnettv.cnet.com/liveatces" rel="nofollow">http://cnettv.cnet.com/liveatces</a><br><br>Just saw the Lady GaGa article up there.<br><br>Sorry, that was completely off topic.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[glamajamma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[so it'll cost in the neighborhood of....?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RadicalxEdward]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@radicalxedward <br><br>if you have to ask, it's not for you]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[G]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@radicalxedward Don't care... I'm buying one!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NoBox]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@radicalxedward <br><br>A decent RC helicopter will run you around $200. This guys got a couple of decent cameras on board but a more restricted flight distance and no controller. It appears to have a decent surveillance setup out of the box and because of that they may try to market it that way but would most likely fail. If they do go that direction I would guess it would be priced around $500-$600. If they actually want to sell a few of these I would think $250-$350 might be a sweet spot. Let's just hope they've done their due diligence on pricing or the only way many of us are going to enjoy this thing is through Mr. Jones' YouTube video postings.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[davebach]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DaveBach  -  Coaxial helis are easy to fly, but nothing like this and you still have to find a vibration free camera mount and feed.<br><br>Theres the Draganflyer X6: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34No-71KJKs" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34No-71KJKs</a><br><br>But for most peeps, budget/fun wise for better outdoor performance is to just use a slow elapor foam parkflyer.  =)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ducman69]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 3:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[How much does it cost?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iappsdev]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA["and likely has more intelligence on board than a lunar lander"<br><br>Something tells me the Apollo astronauts would be want to disagree with you here.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Haji Hill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@hajihill Read up on exactly what electronics were present in the lunar lander. Most graphing calculators have "more intelligence on board than a lunar lander".  Now then, if you're including the intelligence of the pilots themselves in that arguement, then, yes, you are right.  If you're talking about the power of the electronics on board, then you'd be very surprised at how underpowered the equipment they used was.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 2:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@hajihill then they would be wrong.  The apollo computers were pretty simple, actually.  This thing definitely has more technology (especially when you couple it with any device you want via the SDK)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 2:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@hajihill <br>Apparently the guidance systems on the Appolo lander was about as clever as your common home appliance and the entire lander about equivalent to a cell phone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sean]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 2:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@heltoupee  @adma84<br><br>i believe he was referring to the intelligence of the astronauts themselves.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaosu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 2:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@xkaosu9x and all<br><br>Yes, of course, I was referring to the astronauts own intelligence and how the sentence was phrased.<br>To my knowledge we haven't managed to create a technological intelligence yet, but, of course, I understand what was intended.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Haji Hill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 3:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@hajihill <br><br>Something tells me you haven't looked into this yourself.  Most advanced calculators have more computing power and any smart phone has way more computing power than the Apollo computers.<br><br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Guidance_Computer" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Guidance_Computer</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BuffaloX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 6:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[how much , quanto ? where can i buy in the uk please ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Diesel1313]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 12:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you're going into a niche market like this WHY limit it to a further niche market (iPhone owners). It would be so much better to have a dedicated gyro controller with longer range since 1) the iPhone and most all other smartphones lack any serious WiFi transmission power and 2) will open this product up to any individual regardless of what phone they own (or don't own)<br><br>Another one of those companies to go belly-up in 2010.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Accidental <br>1. its not limited to iPhone, they simply aren't developing the apps for other devices.  2.  No remote == less expensive (theoretically).  3.  The same "niche" market that would purchase/has the money for this probably has an iPhone/Touch or another similar device (see 1.).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[credo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@credo  <br>'aren't developing the apps for other devices' is the same is limiting the flying contraption to iPhone/Touch owners. Will they develop for other devices in the future with gyro features? Who knows. <br><br>I don't think a controller would be too much more. Think of a Wii Remote. Just replace Bluetooth with WiFi, change the form factor and add some amperage and you're looking at $10 to $15 in production costs.<br><br>Sucks cause I like this thing and I don't want an iPhone or Touch. Just give me a remote! (or at least charge a little extra for one)<br><br>What's next? A dishwasher that is controlled by your phone? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Accidental  <br>OH BTW the video is on CNN.com and a lot of other sites =)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Accidental  <br>What I mean is PARROT won't be producing the apps themselves.  However they are making the APIs available to all and should be releasing the source code for the iPod app to make it easy for devs to port over, to say, Android devices.  This is meant for the open source(ish)/tweaker community.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[credo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Accidental <br>You missed the open source platform reference at the end of the video then. It isn't just the iProduct that can control it. It's anything with wifi. The source and spec are available, so how long before a bunch of people make their own control programs..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Bailey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 9:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've got $500 that says its mine. No way it'll be more than that, right... right?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[asphaltdragon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[Don't forgot about the French company "Int13" who create the Augmented Reality motor. Nothing will be possible without them.<br><a href="http://bit.ly/4DIgsJ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4DIgsJ</a> <br>All company is able to made a Drone with rotor but the Augmented Reality software, no ;-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[masa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[i want to know if its an ad-hoc wifi connection or through a network.  the later would be pointless]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shryx86]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@shryx86 <br>i agree, an infrastructure mode wifi connection would be really limited/ pointless.<br><br>but imagine if a future iteration had an assignable IP address, and an internet connection on board (via e.g. a rocketstick), then you could control one over the net - which would just be scandalous!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bombos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@shryx86 <br><br>The latter wouldn't be pointless. You'd be able to control the device from work to look around the house...which...would...be...pointless...ok, nevermind. LOL.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Arimanio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@shryx86 i can see how it would be useful to have it work over a network, but that would become a bit more than recreational use.  you would have you travel to the location to place the drone anyway unless you're really lucky and have one of those free city internet services.  imagine losing your connection on the other side of the city.  the plane just auto lands...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shryx86]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks fun to fly .]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SpeedGun]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[Come on Engadget, we want to see the video...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@adma84 <br><br>There is a WHOLE BUNCH on YouTube:<br><a href="http://ardrone.parrot.com/parrot-ar-drone/videos/#player" rel="nofollow">http://ardrone.parrot.com/parrot-ar-drone/videos/#player</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chaosdivine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[I personally think these guys are "demoing" this technology with an iPhone for grander schemes - to have their IP bought out by a bigger fish. They are saying, hey, this thing is so simple that your everyday iPhone can control it - can you imagine what you could do with this as a full size UAV and satellite technology? Seriously, a Government contract (or research grant) is what all these micro UAV kiddies are after. R/C or WiFi controlled aeroplanes (flying vehicles) look cute but the technology behind them is something fierce...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chaosdivine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Chaosdivine <br>Nice avatar pic - I have the same lamp and my walls are about the same color!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phenoum]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Phen  <br>ahhh, now I see it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[credo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Phen  <br>Just remember to wash your hands when you're done ;)<br><br>I will never look at a lamp the same way again...*sigh*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chaosdivine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Chaosdivine <br><br>Oh, and Hollywood & the film industry as well as police, sports teams, TV, are interested too...<br><br>This micro UAV is the most "mature" and simple device I've ever seen...someone's going to come knocking.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chaosdivine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 1:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Chaosdivine  <br><br>Is it just me or does this look like something that should be on Make or Instructibles? The fact they are trying to sell it is almost funny.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KingJustin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 2:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@KingJustin  you obviously don't know a lot about technology or R&D...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 2:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@KingJustin  <br><br>Well possibly, but I am thinking a little bit further down the line. Yes, they are marketing it at kids primarily but for them to REALLY make money, they need to scale this technology up to R/C size (gas motors and such). If they could do that, then they will be taken a lot more seriously. The technology they have crammed into that sucker is awesome. Hell, there is a guy named Moller who has spent $200 million on something sort of similar (SkyCar - <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moller_Skycar_M400" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moller_Skycar_M400</a>). Its fine and dandy to push these on kids and us nerdies but if I wanted to get rich, I would be getting serious about taking this product to the "next level".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chaosdivine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 2:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@adma84  <br><br>I second that...The formulas involved in the aerodynamics to keep it in a stationary hover alone are difficult, not to mention the lack of DIY gyroscope capability.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Arimanio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 2:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Arimanio  <br><br>I don't disagree. It just doesn't impress me that much, we have been seeing this kind of thing for years. Moller has been working on his deal for what, 20 years? If they sell this thing for cheap ($100-150) then I will be impressed. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KingJustin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 2:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/parrot-ar-drone-hands-on-a-quadricopter-for-the-rest-of-us/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Chaosdivine  Maybe Parrot's business is not primarly aimed at us nerds and games. All the buzz around this device and the fact that everyone sees what they're capable of is defenetly good for their OEM business ...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Isidith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2010 8:43PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
