<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[NUMber ONe?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Wilson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 3:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[sweet i did it, i feel all good now. pertaining to the article looks like an old newspaper i guess]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Wilson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 3:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[Say it with me now... iSlate!<br>Of course, I'm probably wrong, but we'll know in a few weeks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[akhileagles]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 3:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[@foxh8er2 <br><br>I'm guessing you are wrong because the speculation is that the iSlate will be priced under $1000.  This screen cannot be cheap right now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Najakwa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 4:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[@NaJaKwa  The beauty of using existing LCD tech is that this IS dramatically cheaper to produce than eink screens are.  Last I read, this was no more expensive to produce than any other LCD, though certainly some research cost went into creating the reflective layers.<br><br>Apple would completely revitalize themselves in my eyes if they used pixel qi.  eink is dramatically over-rated, too expensive and far too slow.  Something like this would keep a multimedia tablet a tablet, still allow excellent battery life, and keep costs down.  If their alleged tablet uses the iphone OS, then that means apps for B&N, Kindle, AND eReader will available for it, to say nothing of the ever-popular stanza.  I'd never buy an iPhone, but a pixelqi iSlate with the iPhone OS... maybe.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 4:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[@foxh8er2 <br><br>Apple will likely be going with tried and true technology and not some upstart company.  Too big a risk if you ask me.  Apple's device will probably focus more on video media than merely the conventional book, magazines, newspaper stuff.  I doubt if PixelQi displays are meant to handle gaming frame-rates.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Average White Boy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 9:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope to see more Tegra 2 powered Qi based tablets. I loved the features of Notion Ink tablet, but the prototype surely lacks in the looks department. Hopefully the industrial design when mass produced would fix that ...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 3:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Rex The glossy screen really bothers me on the Notion Ink Adam.  I mean wtf?  Great daylight reading IF you can see past the fraking glare.  Hopefully that's not in the final design.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 5:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[Video not available....<br><br>Anyways I'm hoping Engadget posts an article that reviews ALL the different e-Readers that were announced at this even cuz right now it just seems like one big giant clusterfuck...<br><br>Add in all the tablets that also could be e-readers my mind is spinning.<br><br>All I know is that the Kindle is fugly and the HP tablet doesn't look like anything special....<br><br>Of course Apple has me dying to know what they've got in the woodworks and chances are it could be the best thing since sliced bread.<br><br>All this anticipation is killing me though...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheRogueFFAngel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 4:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[Could be Apple, anything is possible ..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nineteen88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 4:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Aziz S <br><br>Can they cure cancer?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[paul34]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 4:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[@paul34  <br><br><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8443541.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8443541.stm</a><br><br>Maybe?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 10:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[i am overly excited what Apple is going to present to the World end of the Month. <br><br>But if the "Tablet whatever" is going to have this kind of tech, implemented in perfection. Featuring Multitouch and all the stuff. And if they would then be starting to sell books via iTunes. Kindle would most certainly suffer and depending on Apples pricing this suffering will end in a painful death. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MoJo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 4:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[@iRACK <br>Eh, there are those of us who find Apple products to be entirely frustrating, so I don't think they can just kill the Kindle with a product that costs 3 times as much.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CtrlBurn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 4:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[@CtrlBurn  Thats why i said "depending on Apples pricing" ... But i Agree it will not be for everyone... The iPOD doesn't appeal to so many does it? Ok well to most the People in the world but that is not everyone ;-) <br><br>Downrating imminent. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MoJo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 4:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[@CtrlBurn <br><br>You find computers frustrating? Or is it that you struggle with unix?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cy Starkman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 5:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[Kindle 3?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rickjamess04]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 4:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Rick James Is a good guess to i think. Lets just wait (cant no more) and see what the Year will bring. <br><br>I must admit, this kind of hybrid is going to be the Future and i LOVE it. Always hated to read long texts on LCD´s, and that is not only me but millions. I should get stock from Qi... if they are listed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MoJo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 4:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Rick James I'd rather see it on more open devices first.  A pixel qi kindle would still limit you to OTA shopping from Amazon alone.  A pixel qi Windows/Linux/iPhone OS/Android present more book choice more conveniently to the user from apps that directly connect to several major stores.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 6:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Rick James <br><br>>Kindle 3?<br><br>That's what I've been hoping.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Carld]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 8:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Rick James <br>It would need to be thicker than its predecessors, and wouldn't get the same kind of battery life.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 1:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[@iRACK  <br><br>first thing i did when i heard about what this company was developing was look to see if they were publicly traded. too bad they're not :-/<br><br>you better believe i'm picking up some stock tho if they do go public!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DJPalesto]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 4:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA["With the backlight on the screen color looked crisp though horizontal viewing angles while watching a video clip on the screen were poor in some lighting."<br><br>Ow, my brain.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CtrlBurn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 4:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[Whatever... Just announce this in a netbook already so I can buy it.  The battery life savings alone would make me buy this thing....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GadgetGeek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 4:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[@GadgetGeeks There was once some tentative talk about pixelqi conversion kits.  If you have a particularly popular netbook already, you might someday have the option to convert it yourself.<br><br>I have an AAO, not the greatest netbook ever, but very widely sold.  I'm hopeful that Pixel Qi follows through on conversion kits.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 5:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd also like to see this in a netbook. With Windows you literally have support for every ebook format there is (without the mess of converting and/or DRM stripping).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 7:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[Methinks ASUS - it could be Lenovo; it won't be Samsung - they are THE LCD people.  Might be HP, but my money is on ASUS.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[E. Leigh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 4:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Pixel Qi screens are supposed to be very cheap. They are built in existing LCD fabs using existing LCD processes. There's no need to think the devices incorporating them will be expensive. Mary Lou did come from the One Laptop Per Child group, keeping things inexpensive runs in her blood :-)<br><br>I'm really excited for these screens because they promise the power of a computer with the battery life of an E-ink device.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[metz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 4:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[No matter how cheap the displays actually are, I can almost guarantee OEMs will inflate their prices. Milking us early adopters.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 8:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ah..., this is it.  An all-in-one, dual-mode convertible Tablet PC + e-Reader.  Swappable between the two uses.<br><br>Ectaco jetBook e-readers use a similar non-backlit LCD screen, and get good battery life with a low-power processor.<br><br>Make it thin and light, with SSD, and dual boot capable to a simple power-saving OS for when e-reading.  Then when your PDF doesn't look so good on the e-reader screen, swap to your full OS.  Or when you're running low on battery power, swap to e-reader mode.<br><br>Maybe two years away?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe T.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 5:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dear LCD manufaturers, <br><br>Please stop this 16:9 nonsence. This screen format is not suitable for every situation. This is specially true for tablets.<br><br>Why should I need a long device when format that mimics a paper is more suitable for this?<br><br>Hopefull they will sort it out soon.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kris Lee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 5:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dear LCD manufacturers:<br><br>Love the 16:9, keep it up.  It's a wonderful AR for the large variety of media a tablet can handle AND it's a near approximation of legal paper and the ever handy 8x5 notepad formats.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 6:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[As I recall the main reason manufacturers switched to 16:9 (ditching the taller 16:10) was so they could share part of the manufacturing process with their LCD TVs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2010 7:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[Interesting stuff to be sure.<br>Probably the most anticipated tech for this year by me personally.<br>BUT - I want to see some actual productions units and some in depth testing and review talking about the contrast vs e-ink while in reflective mode.<br>This vid wasn't that impressive but then you are seeing it through a camera and with sunlight backlighting it - not actually lighting it through most of the vid.<br>So, I am still quite hopeful for it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 12:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[@savagemike but by comparing it to the kindle, you could see that it wasn't far off, both are dark and blurry on the crappy video, but by comparison there is probably not enough of a visual dropoff with the Qi to overcome the fact that it's color and has a refresh rate high enough to play video.  The battery life would be longer too, but enough to be mentioned against the kindle's ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[thehumble1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2010 10:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[this is some exiting stuff. :) Make a tablet of this screen and it's going to be HAWT!!! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[theoc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 10th 2010 4:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/pixelqi-screens-to-be-used-by-major-manufacturer-in-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[Say it with me people:  needs to be dual screen and the other screen can be full LCD tech with a backlight and touch for all I care. We only really need one reflective screen. That's why I think a true e-ink is still better than these hybrid techs, we usually switch between image and text anyway, so there isn't a problem if the youtube vid is on one screen while the comments are on another. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[thehumble1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2010 10:35AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
