http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/ Engadget Comments for Liquid Image Summit Series Snow Goggles heads-on http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/Jan 9th 2010 9:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/
$149 isn't a bad price at all when you compare them to a couple pairs of Oakley goggles I've bought for skiing. I'd want these to be able to accept at least three other lenses in addition to the ones shown though at this price and I'd want to make sure they were available to be purchased. Additionally I'd want to make sure they fit well both with and without a helmet.]]>Jan 9th 2010 10:34PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/Jan 9th 2010 9:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/Jan 9th 2010 9:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/Jan 9th 2010 9:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/Jan 9th 2010 9:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/Jan 9th 2010 9:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/02/liquid-image-outs-summit-series-snow-camera-goggles-ahead-of-ces/]]>Jan 9th 2010 9:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/
This was posted on Engadget last week.
http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/02/liquid-image-outs-summit-series-snow-camera-goggles-ahead-of-ces/]]>Jan 9th 2010 9:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/Double Kill!]]>Jan 9th 2010 9:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/Jan 9th 2010 9:33PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/Jan 9th 2010 9:33PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/Jan 9th 2010 9:34PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/Jan 9th 2010 10:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/
But you already knew that.]]>Jan 9th 2010 10:37PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/Jan 9th 2010 9:56PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/Jan 9th 2010 10:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/Jan 9th 2010 10:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/Jan 9th 2010 11:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/
http://www.smithoptics.com/I-O_11_939.html?fl=true]]>Jan 9th 2010 11:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/Jan 9th 2010 11:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/Jan 10th 2010 1:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/liquid-image-summit-series-snow-goggles-heads-on/Piss off... Your comments are the ONLY ones on this page that have been downranked into oblivion, obviously you don't have anything to add to the conversation.

I would really like to know the storage or recording capabilities of this! I have been wanting something like this for some time, not just for skiing/snowboarding (although that would be cool too), but for other things as well. I have wanted to start skydiving, but don't wanna pay most the places $50-$100 for a DVD of it, this would fit the bill. And when I ride my motorcycle through National Parks and really beautiful places, I wish I could show people what I see and the experience, and how the view is so much more different on a motorcycle instead of a car (although I would have to look a little silly while wearing them, I would rather spend $150, look silly for 5-10 minutes while I take a video of my ride, and then put them back in my pack than pay 2-4 times much for a different camera solution. Gotta wear goggles if I don't have my full-face helmet anyway!). Mountain biking, rock climbing, there are lots more applications... if u can stand to wear goggles doing it ;-)]]>Jan 10th 2010 10:22PM