<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[That would make me want to buy an e-reader. I've been holding out for color. Textbooks with diagrams suck in B/W.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[amovitz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 1:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, great tech, the ereader market is moving so fast!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lawrence Stevens]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 1:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now THAT'S what I'm talking about...way to go Qalcomm, you just powned the current marketplace.<br><br>Engadget: Your bandwidth costs are going to be insane if everyone downloads your 45 mb 1080p MOV file...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chaosdivine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 1:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Chaosdivine The video is stored on AOL's podcast server, that server is designed for large amounts of bandwidth]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lareeth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 1:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[@lareeth  <br><br>I wish I had one of those (high bandwidth media server)...<br>Thanks for the reply...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chaosdivine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 10th 2010 3:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[Whats the refresh rate of this and more importantly, how does it work? 6x less power than e-ink under which conditions I wonder...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 1:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[@tinytom Im not sure what the video speed is, but the tech is like e-ink where if nothing is moving the image stays and no power is needed to hold it in place.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peteo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 2:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Peteo  you can grab more info about it here:<br><br><a href="http://www.betanews.com/article/The-science-behind-Qualcomms-mirasol-color-ebook-displays/1263015723" rel="nofollow">http://www.betanews.com/article/The-science-behind-Qualcomms-mirasol-color-ebook-displays/1263015723</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peteo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 2:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Peteo  <br>Not exactly true... Whether a subpixel is "on" or "off", a voltage is required to maintain it's state. Also, even with a static image, the polarity of the pixel must be continually switched to prevent charge build up, which will cause a pixel to stick.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[displaysRus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've said it before mostly out of principle, but now I see the technology catching up:<br><br>In ten years, most displays will use reflected light. It's just more natural and easier on our eyes.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[v]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 1:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Vance <br>So the original GameBoy Advance was way ahead of it's time?<br>I think maybe a combination of both reflecting natural light and using it's own light source would be ideal, that way you could use it both outdoors in the bright sun and indoors in a dark basement.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[reallynotnick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 3:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Vance <br><br>that's too bad cause i like to work in the dark]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kinger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 3:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[@reallynotnick  <br>natural + a tad of blue light would be perfect... <br>that should make it whiter.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[usernr1337]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 4:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[@reallynotnick  <br>Enough with the GBA comparisons! Sure it had a reflective color display (LCD in that case), but the contrast was lousy by today's standards. As was the resolution. And properly scaled up that screen would have used considerably more power than this one.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 5:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[MY HEAD A SPLODE<br><br>Pure want, covered in want-sauce]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[B.Y.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 1:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[Want. I'd take it with the yellow tint, even.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 1:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Yoda <br><br>I'd have to agree with you, I like the tint.<br><br>I think it gives this new medium character.<br><br>I wonder if the tint is intentional?<br><br>It may turn out to be easier on the eyes for long duration skimming.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CrackerLacker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 11:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[SLIGHT yellow tint?<br><br>Really?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Neo Anderson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 2:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[Any details on how it works?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 2:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sepiatone goodness. Imagine watching old Deadwood episodes on that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 2:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[Paul Miller in 1080p..... Yummy]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shash450]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 2:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[A magazine at 300 or 600 dpi? C'mon, give me a break, that would actually be anywhere between 1200 and 2500 dpi for anything that isn't rasterized, that is type and line art. Colour and grey-scale pictures such as photos would be between 130 and 200 lpi at 4 colour print, so yes, there would be a lot of difference, as displays are RGB and don't need to rasterize images for CMYK ...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ffelix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 2:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[@eviltwin Paul is confusing DPI and PPI. You can't really compare newspaper print density (in DPI) to digital display density (PPI).<br><br>However, digital photos for newspaper print are (from my limited experience) printed at around 200 PPI, while standard magazine photos are at 300 PPI, so this device falls somewhere between newspaper and magazine quality -- which is quite good.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pies]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 10th 2010 5:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope they don't have as much trouble scaling this up to a sheet-of-paper-sized screen as seems to be happening with eink.  I am really extremely excited about this technology... give me a 14" tablet (roughly 8.5x11/A4-sized) which is nearly edge-to-edge, maybe running a real OS (Windows 7 or Linux)... hell yes!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[old_fogie_late_bloomer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 2:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, I hadn't been impressed by Mirasol in the first information I saw about it, but this video looks nice.  Now if we could only see how it looks on a demo that wasn't specifically prepared in advance for the screen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe H]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 2:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow. How does the contrast ratio of B&W text compare to the kindle?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 2:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[There's also Pixel Qi which also supports the ability to enable backlighting as described here:<br><a href="http://armdevices.net/2010/01/08/charbax-tests-pixel-qi-at-ces-2010/" rel="nofollow">http://armdevices.net/2010/01/08/charbax-tests-pixel-qi-at-ces-2010/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitch G]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 2:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[The drawback to Pixel Qi though is that it's only B&W (or more accurately 6-bit grayscale) in its reflective state. That backlight needs to be on (and visible) for color. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 5:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think it looks like step 1.  If I bought it I would love it...at first...then the yellow tint would start to grate on me.  But a real exciting direction for e-readers to be sure]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[vlweir]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 2:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[Might be worth noting that their comparison of Mirasol to E-Ink involves comparing both pushed to video speeds.  You are not going to get weeks of video on a Mirasol Kindle device, just as you would not get weeks of video on an EPD Kindle device.  They tend to be intentionally vague about their comparison, which tends to confuse buyers into thinking they're going to get all the same battery life as an EPD Kindle but with video simultaneously.  In reality, that's not true, and video will drive the battery life way down.  In static images, yes it's effectively "bistable" (they do market it actively as such), even though it requires a constant hold voltage regardless of state, and will have good battery life.  No doubt, this stuff is neat.<br><br>But video will drain the battery life, obviously.  Do not let vague marketing lead you to think otherwise.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BubbaJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 2:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[@BubbaJ <br><br>Your analysis makes no sense.  Go to their website and give on of the like 17 whitepapers they have there to see their very up-front power comparisons.  It's actually the most thorough stuff I've seen from anyone claiming low power displays.  The usage models are exactly the same.  Yes, any display drains power more quickly when running video, and obviously it's not bistable when running video - that's the definition of bistable!  only taking power when active, duh!  Anyway, kindle consumes a crapload of energy just to change the image, they say theirs is way more efficient (its a liquid vs. mechanical thing).  And removing the backlight from the equation automatically gives it permanent power advantages over LCD or OLED.  Whatever the usage scenario, they are saying this technology is WAY more efficient than eink, lcd, and all the others.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffemundo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 6:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[I want to see that kind of DPI in an LCD screen.. THAT would be awesome.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iFargle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 2:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[@iFargle <br><br>Droid, NexusOne, and other ~4" WVGA phones have a similar or higher ppi on their LCDs/OLEDs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[good grief]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 3:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[@good grief  <br><br>One thing worth noting here is that format should be included with ppi.  this XGA is 240ppi, he said, at 5.7".  That's pretty dense, so each pixel must be smaller than the typical LCD, which would make sense as each is a little mirror.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffemundo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 6:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't mind charging any device once a week or once every few days. The fact that I can take it on an overnight trip out of town and still have juice when I get back speaks volumes. <br><br>I picked up a kindle a couple of weeks ago for the wife. Maybe we should consider returning it since I'm not all that thrilled with it, and a dozen or so ebooks have risen from CES. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 2:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's about time Qualcomm showed a demo like this. I've been patiently watching this tech from before Qualcomm bought Iridigm hoping it would live up to the potential and it looks like it finally is.<br><br>Seeing as this is a reflective display, I assume the yellow tint is caused by the room lighting. They should use a light sensor to adjust colour hue depending on the ambient light. I imagine it would look amazing outdoors.<br><br>RIM, are you watching? Reflective displays making a comeback!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 2:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oi! Can you guys compare the Mirasol screen to the PixelQi? To late? How about a table with all the bi-stable screen technologies, including pertinent information...such as viewing angle, power consumption, contrast ratio, number of colors (16K?). Please?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[user001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 3:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[These are Acer Timeline models, not Aspire. I own one of these. It is a great laptop.<br><br>I called Acer technical support, and they will ship out a replacement wire for me. I will wait to see how it is fixed]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[haidongh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 4:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[Paul seems like a very nice guy. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 5:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[washed out colors on a sepia background?<br>and this is cool? because?<br>I DONT GET IT]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[boba]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 7:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) <br><br>...because the tech is very impressive and unique compared to other e-ink like solutions. Is it that hard to get? Let me know if you need help understanding anything else that's clearly obvious.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nikescar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 9:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) <br>Because it's the most promising bistable display technology out there right now. Of course it has to improve over time, but for a prototype it looks very good (e-ink looked way worse in its early years). Could be mainstream for video-enabled full-color readers/tablets in 3-5 years.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 10:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[Slight yellow? Looks almost brown to me! Interesting product nonetheless. I think I'd prefer an LCD screen that I have to charge daily though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bonedog73]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2010 12:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm Mirasol display video hands-on in glorious 1080p]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/qualcomm-mirasol-display-video-hands-on-in-glorious-1080p/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can't wait!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BlueIndigo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 6th 2010 1:40AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
