http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/runcores-100gb-pro-v-solid-state-drive-gets-benchmarked-loved/ Engadget Comments for RunCore's 100GB Pro V solid state drive gets benchmarked, loved http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/runcores-100gb-pro-v-solid-state-drive-gets-benchmarked-loved/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/runcores-100gb-pro-v-solid-state-drive-gets-benchmarked-loved/Jan 9th 2010 10:59AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/runcores-100gb-pro-v-solid-state-drive-gets-benchmarked-loved/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/runcores-100gb-pro-v-solid-state-drive-gets-benchmarked-loved/Jan 9th 2010 11:27AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/runcores-100gb-pro-v-solid-state-drive-gets-benchmarked-loved/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/runcores-100gb-pro-v-solid-state-drive-gets-benchmarked-loved/
Also the Pro IV is still the absolute best solution for the price and most anyone with a desktop, notebook, or netbook will not be able to tell the difference between the IV and V. Where is will be noticeable is with enterprise solutions and applications that require high speed random writes.

Matt
Runcore]]>Jan 9th 2010 4:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/runcores-100gb-pro-v-solid-state-drive-gets-benchmarked-loved/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/runcores-100gb-pro-v-solid-state-drive-gets-benchmarked-loved/Jan 9th 2010 11:50AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/runcores-100gb-pro-v-solid-state-drive-gets-benchmarked-loved/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/runcores-100gb-pro-v-solid-state-drive-gets-benchmarked-loved/
Too bad since they were the only 1.8" ZIF SSDs larger than 32GB that were not $500+ when you could find them at all.]]>Jan 9th 2010 12:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/runcores-100gb-pro-v-solid-state-drive-gets-benchmarked-loved/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/runcores-100gb-pro-v-solid-state-drive-gets-benchmarked-loved/
Thank you Engadget for the post your site is the best of the best.

Runcore is at CES right now at booth #35516.

Matt Dawson CMO
Runcore
]]>Jan 9th 2010 4:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/runcores-100gb-pro-v-solid-state-drive-gets-benchmarked-loved/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/runcores-100gb-pro-v-solid-state-drive-gets-benchmarked-loved/I installed the SSD in my MacBook Pro, what an incredible difference, I had no issues at all, and the support was top notch. Highly recommended]]>Jan 9th 2010 4:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/runcores-100gb-pro-v-solid-state-drive-gets-benchmarked-loved/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/runcores-100gb-pro-v-solid-state-drive-gets-benchmarked-loved/
...seems to BE the case.... maybe?

Free edits, for free journalism.

-bZj]]>Jan 9th 2010 12:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/runcores-100gb-pro-v-solid-state-drive-gets-benchmarked-loved/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/runcores-100gb-pro-v-solid-state-drive-gets-benchmarked-loved/
I don't care how much that would cost, the performance and lack of degradation would be just awesome.]]>Jan 9th 2010 1:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/runcores-100gb-pro-v-solid-state-drive-gets-benchmarked-loved/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/runcores-100gb-pro-v-solid-state-drive-gets-benchmarked-loved/
It's not so much about the manufacturer keeping their costs down, it's about Sandforce getting a higher proportion of the manufacturer's costs.]]>Jan 9th 2010 2:45PM