<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Where are the conncectors? And how can it be dual channel with one dd3 slot?<br>do want anyways...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[peter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 9:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) thats either a stacked slot, or a front/back config.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[youngstunna]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 9:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) <br><br>From only the one picture you can't tell, but there is likely another slot on the reverse side. As for the connectors, it might just be showing the bare motherboard.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ebonebrake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 9:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@vlad the inhaler  <br>Yeah it looks very much like the stacked slots on my laptop motherboard, which are very low-profile. There appears to be 2 sets of arms in the photo also. That said the other could be on the reverse.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[plastik]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 10:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) This is a COM-Express form factor, so the only connections to it are through two 200-pin .5mm pitch connectors (that's half a millimeter between each pin!).  In order to use this module, you would need to fabricate your own carrier board, and have a pretty serious soldering setup to put it all together.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[boatzart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 11:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@boatzart  I'd imagine if they sell it, they'll sell various carrier boards too.  They'd be seriously limiting themselves if they made people build their own io connections.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[thedman07]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 12:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was doing a double take for a second. (I didn't see the mobile i7 part)<br><br>If it was a regular i7, the heatsink would be almost as big/bigger than the board itself. :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 9:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Turbo Boost?  Really?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shawn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 10:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@feeble11 In case you were refering to the turbo boost of the santa rosa chipset, this is NOT the same thing. Turbo Boost is basically manufacturer sanctioned overclocking. If all cores are not being used and thermals permit, the processor will automatically overclock the used cores. it just seems that the engineers need to get more creative with naming these things :)<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 10:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@feeble11 <br>Yep, we're officially back in the 1980's.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[plastik]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 10:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@feeble11 <br>Ludicrous Speed]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[daytripper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 1:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[wasn't kitt - knight rider (80s) the 1st with turbo boost?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xconan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 7:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Make it the Core i7-640UM for only 18W and shove it in a range of 11.6, 13, 14, 15.6 inch laptops.*cough* ASUS UL and Acer Timeline *cough*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 10:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dds1043 ooops looks like its actually the i7-620UE. Thats what I get for reading the article rather than reading the Intel chart.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 10:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now I have to clean up this excitement mess I made.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean O]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 10:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA["BM"57 - like, bowel movement? are they trying to give you an early warning that their product will be shit? :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Prokanda]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 11:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[For graphics and video... and no dedicated GPU? OK if you say so.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[netsql]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 11:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@netsql Where did they say "graphics and video"?  They said HTPC, which this would pull off very easily.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[thedman07]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 12:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[the i7-600 series is crap. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Grammar Delinquent]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 12:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SirNoDroin <br><br>Yep, highest performing mobile dual core CPUs ever. Utter garbage. <br><br>Idiot. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 2:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SirNoDroin well i consider 99% of mobile PCs crap anyway.<br><br>I don't need to carry a computer around, I need it to be work done quickly.<br><br>The fact that we have sacrificed increasing computer speed (and therefore productive) with the need for mobility is stupid, if you had a faster computer that could get more work done quicker, you wouldn't have to be mobile computing in the first place.<br><br>50+% of laptop buyers never even travel with it, and buy it under the false notion of saving space.<br><br>So i stand by my statement.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Grammar Delinquent]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 2:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SirNoDroin  <br><br>So do I. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 3:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SirNoDroin  Really? Your comment is to yourself?<br>Laptops /are/ smaller than desktops. Unless you're comparing laptops from 1986 to desktops of today... then your comment would be full of win. But the last time I checked, it's only 1986 at H&M.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[postmastersteve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 3:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SirNoDroin Last time I checked, my 6 year old pentium 4 machine with a 9700 graphics card can render video at least twice as fast as my 1 year old required by school laptop with a Core2Duo with 9300m graphics card. Price wise, they were about the same. This is video production rendering, Majority of the rendering takes place on the processor, not the graphics card. <br><br>As i said, I stand by my statement.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Grammar Delinquent]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 3:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SirNoDroin  <br><br>At this point I can't tell if you're joking or just brain dead. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 4:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SirNoDroin <br><br>Yes because you know for 90% of the world that is not bound by the speed of their Renderfarm in how fast they do things, having a less mobile faster computer is the perfect solution. <br><br>Now lets move back to reality, where most people i know own and use laptops because they have to do work in multiple places. This is 99% of people employed in Scientific and Business related jobs, which last I checked compromised a larger portion of the workforce then people using Maya to make the next Avatar. <br><br>You != Everyone. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shyam D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 4:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SirNoDroin this troll is full<br><br>muhahahahaa]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Grammar Delinquent]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 4:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@postmasterSteve  <br><br>I love this comment for so many reasons.<br><br>I have an i7 920 desktop at home, but there are times when I need to do drafting on the road.  As such, when my current 3 year old lappy goes, I will happily get a mobile i7 so my work doesn't slow to a crawl.  Then I do large renderings at home.  Simple as that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean O]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 4:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SirNoDroin  Funny thing is that only 1% of American are like you. Most American computer needs are pretty basic.  So even if a laptop cleans up the mess of chord that you have to set up, it may be better for most Americans.  I have a laptop and it video edits home movies like a champ, and when I want to surf the internet on my coach I can.  Try that with your desktop. And your 50% statistic is crap. While 50% might leave it in one place most of the time, It's probable that every now and then they do move it for one reason or another.<br><br>Lastly, My laptop uses 1/3 of the electricity as your desktop and that can add up if you actually use your computer daily. So, laptops are more energy efficient for 90% of what most Americans do.  <br><br>Please don't use your atypical needs as the standard for the rest of the world.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[69camaroSS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 4:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SirNoDroin  <br><br>I've read some of your other posts. <br><br>You being a troll, and you being an idiot aren't mutually exclusive. <br><br>nom nom nom. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 5:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd actually been wondering why this kind of thing wasn't more prevalent.  If you really want a cool and quiet computer, why not do this more?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[old_fogie_late_bloomer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 1:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Old fogie late bloomer because its slower.<br><br>Amount of Space > Time = Money<br><br>bigger and faster is always better.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Grammar Delinquent]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 3:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SirNoDroin  <br><br>He's right, I use a quad core in by HTPC, so I can watch movies twice as fast. I can listen to music 10x faster too. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 3:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SirNoDroin<br><br>I was hoping that you were being sarcastic and forgot your irony mark (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony_mark" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony_mark</a>), though reading your other posts on this subject seems to rule out this possibility.<br><br>An HTPC does not need to be "bigger and faster", it only needs to be fast enough while remaining quiet and unintrusive.  A motherboard such as this should provide more than adequate power for any task you demand of such a computer while fitting into an enclosure of comparable size to a Blu-ray player or game console.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[old_fogie_late_bloomer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 4:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's one tiny mofo.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bootareen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 3:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MrAffrox : That's what she said!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 5:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MrAffrox  : That's one tiny mobo? :-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MusikMeister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 5:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@One Love: I call shenanigans. she doesn't know what a mobo is. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Prokanda]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 5:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Congatec BM57 fits mobile Core i7 onto tiny mobo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/congatec-bm57-fits-mobile-core-i7-onto-tiny-mobo/</guid><description><![CDATA[When someone says "i7", you dont think of mobile processors, you think of the i7 920.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 9:17PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
