<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yay for selling the same things with different names for higher prices!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 6:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Erb <br>Ati is not doing any better with the 5000 Series (little performance boost from 4000 series) so i don't know why we are only attacking Nvidia<br><br>Ati don't even update their mobile drivers Good luck getting your graphic card drivers from dell/hp/asus/etc, at least Nvidia update their mobile drivers<br><br>Again ATI is properly playing around since Nvidia did not release fermi yet the next big battle will be between Fermi vs 5000 Series refresh.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GoogleCEO]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 6:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@GoogleCEO  No, the 5000 series mobile chips are quite a lot better than the 4000 series and the 200m series from Nvidia. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SarnGate]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 7:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SarnGate  <br>5870 their top card is 20% faster than GTX260m<br>Nvidia rebrands usually are 20% faster than previous card<br><br>If you want a real card wait for Fermi vs 5000 Refresh or listen to the fanboys who did down rank me if you think they will pay for your notebook.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GoogleCEO]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 8:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Erb Rebadging is all nvidia has been doing for the last 5 years, 8800 > 9800 > 200 > 300, all 99% the same damn architecture, sure there is a die shrink or two in there but the graphical power has not really increased in that time anywhere near what it had in previous generations.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nanan00]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 10:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@GoogleCEO  I will agree with you that ATI has left users high and dry with drivers in the past. I would like to point out that a rebrand is just that, a sticker change, nothing else. A rebranded gpu will perform identical to its original. Another bit of misinformation would be the statement that the 5000 series is just a refresh. While the tech is built on the 4000 series it is significantly improved including support for DX11 (which nVidia 300 series does not support as of yet) <br><br>I am a user of both ATI and nVidia and will say that nvidia had the top mobile cards for a while, but ATI has really stepped up there game in the last year. Whoever is on top doesn’t matter, what matters is that both companies fight for the top. This is what leads to better products and better prices for the consumer.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 10:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Erb im wet just looking at it]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sharples696]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 12:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified)  Yes and the HD2000->HD3000->HD4000->HD5000<br><br>All the same damned architecture, just more cores and faster speeds and some small new feature additions.<br><br>Don't be selectively blind.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zvx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 12:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@GoogleCEO<br><br>I don't know what you are smoking. ATI's 4870/4890 have 1/2 the number of cores as the 5870 and less than 60% of the performance. This is in addition to all the DirectX11 features and new multi-display gaming technology in the 5xxx series. <br><br>You cannot possible compare the ATI 4xxx-5xxx change to the three-time rebranding of Geforce G80/G92-based GPUs ...<br><br><a href="http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/2937/amd_s_ati_radeon_hd_5870_vs_hd_4890_gpu_comparison/index3.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/2937/amd_s_ati_radeon_hd_5870_vs_hd_4890_gpu_comparison/index3.html</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loosely_coupled]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 17th 2010 10:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh i might buy it because the number is higher!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ClarkyAC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 6:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ClarkyAC No way I'm buying this until they rename it to at least 400!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tekdemon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 5:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[would you believe ... 500?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bebop]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 7:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, the geforce GT 335m is pretty decent: as fast as a 9800m GS with 30% less memory bandwith (72 sp, 128 bit bus), but low power enough to fit inside an 11.6" laptop]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fara]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 6:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@fabarati But the M11X is a 11.6" laptop specially designed for the GT335M. It is thicker and heavier than your typical netbook, presumably for the extra cooling required. Nor is a 9800M GS impressive technology these days, especially when ATI's 5xxx-series is coming out with DX11 support. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ypoknons]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 6:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@fabarati For something really decent take a look at the competition: ATI mobility HD 5830. Faster than the GT335m, same power envelope and DX 11 support. I wish the M11X had that card. And an i7 ULV.<br><br>That Envy 15 is tempting...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[redshine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 6:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@YpoCaramel  <br><br>DX11 support does not mean that its more powerful, it can work with dx11 but what would you do with 5 frames per second on dx11? If you want DX11 you need to buy the upper level cards which by next year will become mid-level dx11 cards. Dont always fall for the DirectX bs, there is a huge difference between compatible and performance. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hasan M Ch.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 6:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@munakib  I didn't say that it would bring large performance benefits, and I understand the issues. I simply threw it in to demonstrate how the GT335M is technically unimpressive. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ypoknons]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 7:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@munakib  The 5830 is nice, but both the 5830 and the GT335M are 40nm chipsets, I somehow doubt the 800 SP 5830 is going to be comparable to the 72SP GT335M in Thermals.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zvx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 10:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@YpoCaramel  The 335 is as you say technically unimpressive. That’s not the point. The point is sticking a gpu meant for a 15”+ laptop into a sub 12” laptop. That is what is technically impressive. Also, the m11x is not meant to be in direct competition with netbooks as the battery life will attest to. This is a new beast meant for the gamer on the road, I’d say this has more competition in a DS or PSP than a netbook ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 11:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@robamb2002  At least someone gets my point...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fara]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 2:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[regardless, the 5830 is much faster than the GT335.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 9:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[The renaming thing is getting pathetic.<br><br>ATI's 5870 mobile may only have the same number of SPU's as the 4870 mobile, but it's a brand new chip, NOT a rebrand. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaronage]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 7:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Aaronage<br><br>Agreed. When I saw "NVIDIA outs 300M" in the title, I thought "wow, NVIDIA is releasing mobile Fermi GPUs already," then read the article and got an instant rebranded letdown. Then to make matters even more pathetic, when Fermi GPUs actually release, NVIDIA is probably gonna use the GTX300 naming scheme. Causing confusion among the consumer because the GTX300 series is Fermi while 300M series is not. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cyrs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 14th 2010 1:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[There aren't going to be any Fermi-based mobile Geforces. Are you kidding? They'd melt a laptop.<br><br>The best you can hope for in a "GTX" chip is another, higher-clocked, G92.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[futurepastnow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 7:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@FuturePastNow <br><br>maybe they called it the G92 cos they've planned 92 rebrands of the same old crap.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SapperD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 9:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@FuturePastNow G92 isn't being used anymore, these are all GT200 cores.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zvx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 10:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Vdek  The g200 core is just a refresh of the g92 core...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nanan00]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 10:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified)  <br>And the RV870 is just a refresh of the RV770 which is a refresh of the RV670.<br><br>Not to mention the Core i7 is just a refresh of the Core 2 Duo which is a refresh of the Core Duo which is a refresh of the Pentium III which is a refresh of the Pentium II which is a refresh of the Pentium Pro.<br><br>What's your point?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zvx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 12:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Vdek  Uh, no, but good try.  The Core i7 is not a refresh of the Core2.  They have different micro-architectures (Nehalem and Core, respectively).  By your logic the Core i7 is a "refresh" of the 8086.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HotBBQ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 1:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Vdek  I guess he meant rebrand... NVidia does it and thats no point in denying it. I have a 8800GT and once i though i could just "upgrade" to the 9800GT. Turn out that in performance benchemarks comparison they performed almost exactly the same... Thats the point. What matters the most is the peformance gains they sell in the names matchs the performance gains they put on the chiops and thats all. Its clear both companies do evolutionary designs (and not revolutionary, as they market it). For now I'm going with ATI and I guess nVidia's price tag on its new chips will keep me that way...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bvds]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 2:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Vdek  <br>There is refresh as in "double the cores, add in the latest Direct X support, power gating, new video acceleration support" and there is refresh as in "we shrunk the die" and then there is refresh as in "we painted a new number on the side of the box." You'd have to be an idiot not to comprehend the difference, but fortunately for nvidia most of its fanboys fall under that description.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bebop]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[They have really lost me.  9400m to 300m to GTX to GTS to Ultra to big numbers to little numbers.  I have no clue what is what and what is better.<br><br>All I know is, at least ATi is using a half way understandable naming convention still, bigger the number the better the card.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[7egend]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 9:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@7egend I totally agree! And this is totally backwards, seeing as ATI used to have a completely upside down naming scheme whereas NVIDIAs names used to be understandable.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nyaz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 9:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@7egend Not really, the upcoming 5165 is going to be faster than some of the 54xx and 55xx series.  In fact the 5165 is a rebrand of the mobile 4670.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zvx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 10:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@7egend Well, until their next reboot once they hit 9000 again. ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Timson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 1:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ATimson  <br><br>Are you telling me that ATI won't go 'over 9000'?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Forrest]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 1:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@F orrest  <br><br>WHAT?! NINE THOUSAND?!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cyrs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 14th 2010 1:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looking at the specs on Nvidia's site, all these "new" GPUs are just rebadged 200-series chips, they're all still just DX10 hardware with the same specs as 200-series chips.<br><br>Pathetic, Nvidia, really pathetic.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 9:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Crsh Not exactly, the chips are DX 10.1 compatible.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zvx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 2:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Vdek  I mean they're not DX11 hardware, like some of us are expecting.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 8:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[nVidia, stop making new chips until you get your current drivers stable. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Grammar Delinquent]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 12:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[So do they at least use less power and/or put out less heat, or are they 100% the same chip?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[reallynotnick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 12:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA outs 300M mobile graphics series, causes little excitement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/13/nvidia-outs-300m-mobile-graphics-series-causes-little-excitemen/</guid><description><![CDATA[the ATI cards in the past 2 years have absolutely powned nvidia<br><br>all that nvidia has been doing is dropping prices and trying to stay afloat.<br><br>Since their 8800 Direct x10 first leap forward way ahead of ati, they have really not been trying as hard.<br><br>The best nvidia cards now are still old cards with just small changes, the new ATI are completely redone and updated cores.<br><br>while nvidia is still trying to push 2x and 3x of the same old card on one platform...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[*brotha]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2010 3:55PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
