<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Via debuts M'Serv 2100 server with 64-bit Nano CPU</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Via debuts M'Serv 2100 server with 64-bit Nano CPU</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via debuts M'Serv 2100 server with 64-bit Nano CPU]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[So, no computer manufacturers were using their processor so they made a system themselves?<br><br><br>All the Nano needs is a die shrink and a dual core version to really kick some Atom ass. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nitesh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 14th 2010 4:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via debuts M'Serv 2100 server with 64-bit Nano CPU]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[Make the same thing with 4-8 drive bays and I might take a serious look at it as a server. I don't get why they don't throw in more bays on these types of devices. It would have increase the manufacturing cost by what, $20? Maybe $30.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RandomGuy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 14th 2010 4:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via debuts M'Serv 2100 server with 64-bit Nano CPU]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[@RandomGuy <br><br>Probably because 4 bay is perfect for raid 10. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yejun]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 14th 2010 4:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via debuts M'Serv 2100 server with 64-bit Nano CPU]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[@yejun  Exactly my point, any business sysadmin in their right mind that is using this thing would want some sort of redundancy (whether it is at the expense of performance or not) and having 2 drive bays means that it is only really viable to mirror the drives. That means 2TB of usable space.<br><br>I could see it being somewhat viable as a Windows Home server, in that allows you to add external drives, but even still, I think most people would  prefer extra bays to USB or eSATA ports. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RandomGuy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 14th 2010 4:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via debuts M'Serv 2100 server with 64-bit Nano CPU]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[@RandomGuy  <br><br>Hmm, I thought it was a 4 bay device because of its size.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yejun]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 14th 2010 5:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via debuts M'Serv 2100 server with 64-bit Nano CPU]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[@RandomGuy  "I could see it being somewhat viable as a Windows Home server, in that allows you to add external drives, but even still, I think most people would prefer extra bays to USB or eSATA ports."<br><br>Not sure about the "Windows Home server" part.<br><br>Friend of my ran in past on four similar boxes (under Linux) whole IT of a 120-people company. Plus external RAID 10 in a similar closure. <br><br>And all that on top of his desk - he never had to kneel before the servers.<br><br>In the end, if you really care about your data, you want to have external NAS for the purpose. Works with Linux like a charm. Because Windows still wants to have internal HDD and if you want trouble-free long run, you better make the C: a RAID 1.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy00001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 15th 2010 8:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via debuts M'Serv 2100 server with 64-bit Nano CPU]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[small business customer? do you mean owner?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Saja]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 14th 2010 4:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via debuts M'Serv 2100 server with 64-bit Nano CPU]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[This looks very nice.  But no price and no date.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gerrrg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 14th 2010 5:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via debuts M'Serv 2100 server with 64-bit Nano CPU]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[since when is FreeBSD a Linux ditro? <br><br><br>srsly it's even in the freaking name and in caps -.-]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[raidor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 14th 2010 5:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via debuts M'Serv 2100 server with 64-bit Nano CPU]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[@raidor<br><br>FreeBSD is certainly not a Linux distribution.  Engadget can probably be forgiven for their mild lack of Unixy knowledge, but a correction would assuage the rage of the FreeBSD brethren a bit too. :)<br><br>As an aside, it's pretty damn cool that they explicitly call out FBSD support.  That's a rarity (of enormous proportions) in consumer electronics gear.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[doubleyewdee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 14th 2010 6:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via debuts M'Serv 2100 server with 64-bit Nano CPU]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SeeonFeeon <br><br>because most people honestly don't give a shit.<br><br>sorry, i'm a jackass, but it is true, next week when some new shit happens everyone will forget about haiti, just like everyone forgot about new Orleans and the tsunami.<br><br>im a dick, i know, but im being realistic.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian (PC gamer  extraordinaire)]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 14th 2010 5:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via debuts M'Serv 2100 server with 64-bit Nano CPU]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SeeonFeeon No it's just that the engadget office in Haiti was heavily damaged.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sarcasme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 14th 2010 5:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via debuts M'Serv 2100 server with 64-bit Nano CPU]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SeeonFeeon <br><br>I agree. We could all do a lot more to help.<br>I can't understand why your comment has been down graded, it's pretty pathetic that people feel so strongly about not helping that they can't even tolerate reference to help.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Unknown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 14th 2010 6:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via debuts M'Serv 2100 server with 64-bit Nano CPU]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[@BrianH well caring for a week is very good, some peoples don't ever care.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sarcasme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 14th 2010 6:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via debuts M'Serv 2100 server with 64-bit Nano CPU]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kicky  <br><br>being someone from a third world Caribbean country, i am of course saddened by it.<br><br>but i know exactly what will happen with all the money donated to the country, to bullshit.<br><br>the governments of the Caribbean are just as, if not more, curropt that what people say about America.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian (PC gamer  extraordinaire)]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 14th 2010 6:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via debuts M'Serv 2100 server with 64-bit Nano CPU]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[FreeBSD != Linux.<br><br>Other than that kinda looks interesting.  Pondering a homebrew media PC / server at the moment.  Atom or Nano based is my primary focus.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Garp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 14th 2010 7:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via debuts M'Serv 2100 server with 64-bit Nano CPU]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Nano line of CPUs were always 64bit so why such a big reference in the topic? :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Inu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 14th 2010 8:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via debuts M'Serv 2100 server with 64-bit Nano CPU]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[Haitians raped mutilated and ate white little children .Just because its been 200 years ago doesn't mean World forgot . Was it really necessary to cut hearts from lil kids and eat it while parents held to  there watch?<br>or gang rape white Plantation owner  5 year old daughter ?!<br>Sorry I dont feel any compassion for those voodoo losers . And how on earth the managed to breed up to 7 millions ? hello birth control ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ainsi10]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 15th 2010 1:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via debuts M'Serv 2100 server with 64-bit Nano CPU]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/14/via-debuts-m-serv-2100-server-with-64-bit-nano-cpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'll just take a MacMini Server... Snow Leopard Server with unlimited Users for 1k... I'm sold... <br>Nothing against via... but they can keep their lackluster chips and everything.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Leither]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 15th 2010 8:40AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
