<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Google, welcome to the big leagues.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashley Jones]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ashleythehottiest <br><br>It makes me sad to see Google's name grouped with the evil telecomms :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ahartzog  <br><br>The moment Google offered an object of desire (Nexus One) they themselves became evil.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[7egend]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ahartzog  <br>It makes me sad they have a nasty equipment recovery fee. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ahartzog  <br><br>I can even support Apple but definitely not Google.. they are scary.<br>Just because they are giving away stuffs for free doesn't make them customer loving company.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nokia N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ashleythehottiest Can anyone tell me why the RSS feed in Google Chrome doesent work for sites like this?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashley Jones]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 4:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ashleythehottiest  <br><br>Can someone explain to me why the 8GB iPod touch's MSRP is $199, and the 8GB iPhone 3G has an out-of-contract MSRP of, what, like $449? $499?<br><br>There HAS to be price fixing/shenanigans going on. That 3G radio, and that FCC licensing fee cannot possibly be costing hundreds and hundreds of dollars.<br><br>THIS is what the FCC should be looking into! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[matthew Crawford]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 5:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@crawdad689  Since when is a product manufacturer required to account for the cost of production in what they choose to charge for a product? It's called business. I make a product and I sell it for what I choose to sell it for. If you're okay with the price, you buy it. If you're not, you don't.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheBrizz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 6:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheBrizz  <br>So you're alright with Hynix, Infineon, Micron Technology, Samsung, and Elpida dram manufactures fixing prices in the DRAM market,]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hiro256]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 6:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheBrizz  <br><br>that would be fine if only one or some of the handset makers charged that much, but they all do.  businesses coordinating their prices to make them higher and make big margins on each unit is sketchy.  if an investigation found it was unintentional, nothing might happen.  if it was found that there was intentional cooperation, that's illegal (type of monopoly) and there would be ramifications.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[maveric101]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 7:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ashleythehottiest <br><br>the irony of all of this is that google is trying to break the subsidy paradigm by pushing an unsubsidized phone paired with t-mobile's lower monthly charge plan, confusingly called "even more plus". ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yao]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 27th 2010 12:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@crawdad689  Why are you complaining? Just buy an ipod touch.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dennis636223]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 27th 2010 3:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[OH SNAP!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bowsa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Remember, if we didnt have the FCC and the FTC .. we would be paying A LOT more for things]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Neeraj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ipxnsv <br><br>How do you know that? Oh right, you can't. Well done. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dokital]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ipxnsv <br><br>Why is the FCC doing this instead of the FTC? Isn't this more about fair practices with customers than specific use of the airwaves?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[StreetStealth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ipxnsv  rriigghhtt... Keep drinking that populist kool-aid...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 4:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@limaxray  What, you think that if there weren't an FCC and FTC that these corporations would just say 'Well gee, we better play nice and not rip off our customers to make as much money as we possibly can'?  Wow.  What are you smokin?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 27th 2010 11:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[A government agency actually trying to do something for consumers...is it 2012?<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[7egend]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@7egend : Keep dreaming.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 4:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@One Love  Yes, let's remember how the FCC under the last republican administration was very pro-consumer....(I am being sardonic here)<br><br>(Wiretapping allowed by FCC)<br>(Against free AWS-3 - Look it up)<br>(net neutrality - since been reversing a bit)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Victor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 5:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[lets make bets who responds first.And has the most bullsh*t explanation.<br><br>i say :SPRINT OR GOOGLE FIRST...AT&T most bullsh*t explanation..<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Neeko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@neeko18 - you do realize that the ETF from Google is completely different from the providers, right?  The Google ETF covers them for the exact cost of the phone if someone opens a contract and gets the cheaper subsidized phone, then bails on the contract...  So the consumer pays the same amount for the phone either way, and Google doesn't get hosed.  Period.<br><br>The ETFs from the wireless providers, on the other hand, seem to be some combination of scare tactics and actual penalties and "expected income loss" fees that they somehow feel they are entitled to when a customer leaves.  Of course, if their coverage is crap or their service sucks, too bad to the consumer, they still feel they are owed what they can't milk you out of if you leave early.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vrmithrax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[All these people that cry about contracts and ETF's are going to crying even louder when they have to pay $300 or $400 for a phone that used to cost $100.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheBrizz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheBrizz <br>They never actually cost $100. The subsidy offered in the contracts has been paid for by higher service charges and fees.<br><br><br>Who else will not be surprised if the FCC ends up doing nothing. The FCC and FTC we have today are large and somehow overburdened monstrosities that never evolved with the technologies they were meant to oversea. Welcome to bad government 101.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shyam D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@M3  <br>They were doing nothing before, but i consider this a definite step up from doing nothing.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryujin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 4:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheBrizz <br><br>The phone never "cost" $100. Price != Cost. But don't feel bad, Obama is confused about that as well. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Abe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 6:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Abe  What does any of this conversation have to do with Obama? Let it go.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheBrizz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 6:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[$350, is that it? Come to Canada...<br><br>$20 per month up to a maxium of $400 for voice and $20 per month up to a maxium of 300 for data. Total @$$ raping of $700.<br><br>ETF should just be, pay off your device because that's all you keep anyways.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plazmic Flame]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Plazmic Flame <br>Don't forget the equipment, YOUR equipment that you fully paid off, would still be locked. Bell and Telus apparently wants another $75 to unlock, Rogers won't even talk to you about that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ToniCipriani]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ToniCipriani  Which is why it's always easier to go to a third party. I'm in the US but recently used a Canadian company to unlock a Blackberry. US$20 later I had a working unlock code.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nitro122]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 4:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dpeters11  I know that, but compared to some other countries where phones are just sold unlocked, or carriers are mandated to unlock the phones after the lock served its purpose (i.e. enforce the length contract).<br><br>I shouldn't need to pay for unlocking in the first place, period.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ToniCipriani]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 8:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Its about damn time!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brandon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[they should send a  letter to dish network because they also charge 350 for their ETFs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cman103]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[All I want is a straightforward loan. Sign a contract and get a no or low interest loan of up to say $300 to be used towards the purchase of the device. Then the loan is paid off over 12 or 24 months. If the contract is broken, you owe the balance plus maybe a $25 fee. Plain. Simple. Honest. Transparent. How hard is that? It is already what these ETF's are supposedly about, so why not?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@PaulY Oh yeah, and obviously coupled with lower monthly service charges since the rates are currently bloated with $$$'s to recover the hardware subsidies.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@PaulY <br>i love you. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@PaulY <br><br>Tmobile USA  is doing the exact same thing if you care to look at that as an opiton.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sycamore714]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 4:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@PaulY -- That's basically what T-Mobile's installment payment plan is -- when you buy a phone for use with an Even More Plus plan, you can have a no-interest loan to pay the phone off on a monthly basis (if you have good credit, you can finance the entire cost of the phone -- the phone is full-price/unsubsidized).  This applies to the phone and not the plan itself -- but because EM+ plans are month-to-month, you can cancel any time (no termin. fee).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mpv]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 4:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[(@sycamore714 -- sorry, x-post)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mpv]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 4:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@PaulY <br><br>Step 1: Get a credit card.  Step 2: Use said card to pay full retail price for phone.  Step 3: Make minimum payments on your card while enjoying your phone on your service provider with no contract or ETF.   Same thing as what you just recommended...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Netro7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 5:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Netro7  Step 4, convince AT&T, Sprint, and Verizon to lower their monthly rates because I bought my own damn phone. As it is, you're stupid not to get a subsidized phone because you're already paying for it monthly.<br><br>The point is to keep the same basic structure (free/cheap phones with some semblance of commitment) but to make it much more clear what you are paying for. Yes, basically what T-Mob is doing, but with a real wireless footprint and real 3G coverage.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 7:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mpv  <br>Right now I am on their 300 minute pre-Even More Plus plan for $75 a month.  Although the month to month plans are cheaper by about $10, the unlimited Even More Plus plan with web and text is $80, so I see no value in paying more per month.  I wish that they would just cut me a $120 check since I've been with them for almost a year.  Their plans are under the guise of being cheaper, but people who only used 300-600 minutes are bumped up to the unlimited plan for more.  I talked to several reps and was also quite pissed at the fact that they require you to sign a contract to get an employee discount through the company I work for.  The rep, to get the sale, suggested I sign a contract for a free phone then just sell it, to cover any potential ETFs, lol.  I am just sticking with them until something like the Droid hits ATT.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chase]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 27th 2010 10:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[While I appreciate letters, letters are far from action. I'll believe the status quo will change in the ETF field when the FCC/FTC actually issue a ruling mandating a change.<br><br>It's just the constant, burning skeptic in me. Letters are nice, action is better.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Anders <br>They could be using the letters as ammo.  Like we read your explanation and its bullshit so this is what we are going to do. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryujin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 4:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[I for one welcome our original overlords to keep our new overlords in check.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sweet greggo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[I understand the reasoning behind the ETF's. AT&T would lose big money if you could buy a new iPhone cheap and leave the company with it a month later. But why can't they institute a system where the longer you are under contract, the less your ETF would be, since they are making up the money all along while charging you out the a$$ for services like data and texting.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ssracer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ssracer : there are already several ways to do this - half the used phones on Ebay were probably obtained through such means.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr_white]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@psycros  <br><br>Some of the major wireless carriers in the US do this currently.  The ETF amounts are prorated every month that you stay within your contract. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Netro7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 5:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[And yet just today (actually a few minutes ago) I received a letter from AT&T notifying me of their settlement of a class action lawsuit regarding early termination fees.  Given that this settlement covers "January 1, 1998 through November 4, 2009" you would think they had learned their lesson.  But this FCC action implies they haven't...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samurai Jack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 3:43PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
