Some organizations, particularly those that work with new users, and many of whom are applicants to the new Resident Help Network have traditionally been exempted from the written rules by Linden Lab, where Lab staff explained that the written rules were only there for 'problem' events and events-posters.
And really, that's a problem in and of itself. That the rules – as written – are heavily exploitable seems no less of an issue than selective enforcement. That is, selective enforcement of the written rules seems as awkward and inappropriate as having the written rules handle a one-size-fits-hardly-anyone system where many of the highest-quality events and activities must necessarily be excluded from the listings.
Maybe it is past time for Linden Lab to go back and look at the (now four-years-old) events-posting rules and the thousands of events listings that exist, and review them with serious consideration for what they want to achieve and what they want to allow or disallow.
Or, of course, they could just go ahead and apply rigid enforcement to an outdated and antiquated set of regulations with little recognition of what benefits and penalizes users. That's obviously an available option, and seems to be the one that is going ahead here.
* Disclosure: I'm responsible for approximately 60 listed events for classes, and Q&A sessions in Second Life each week, and yes, they've previously been deemed exempt; but they shouldn't need to be special-cases.
||Are you a part of the most widely-known collaborative virtual environment or keeping a close eye on it? Massively's Second Life coverage keeps you in the loop.