<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Is this the Samsung Galaxy 2?</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Is this the Samsung Galaxy 2?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is this the Samsung Galaxy 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is the headphone jack on the side, above the volume rocker?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mondeca]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2010 2:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is this the Samsung Galaxy 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mondeca ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mardenator]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2010 8:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is this the Samsung Galaxy 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is the headphone jack on the side, above the volume rocker?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mondeca]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2010 2:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is this the Samsung Galaxy 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mondeca <br>nope. its a speed hole. it makes it go faster]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rockstar323]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2010 3:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is this the Samsung Galaxy 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[in other words, its a Passion copy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PEZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2010 3:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is this the Samsung Galaxy 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[the screen is 4 inches nit 3.7 inches as eldar murtazin said 2 month ago.<br>Samsung never buy snapdragon from Qualcomm. it uses it`s own SOC ,,,<br><br>YES , We`ll see Hummingbird in the heart of this magical phone... this is a real superphone ......... <br><br>سامسونگ Galaxy2<br><a href="http://www.handheldusers.com/forum/t4557.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.handheldusers.com/forum/t4557.html</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[amirrafie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2010 3:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is this the Samsung Galaxy 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[going hard with android 2.x]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ango]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2010 3:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is this the Samsung Galaxy 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[someone just p-shop'd a nexus screen onto this thing...<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MI_canuck]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2010 3:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is this the Samsung Galaxy 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is this really real?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mirakhur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2010 3:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is this the Samsung Galaxy 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[That does NOT look like a 3.7 inch screen, much less 4.<br><br>The bezel on the bottom is HUGE.<br><br>That's 3.2 or 3.5 at best.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vux]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2010 4:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is this the Samsung Galaxy 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Johnny Rockets I agree.  Though it is sexy.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Galen20K]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2010 6:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is this the Samsung Galaxy 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[32gb on board means no 512 or 256meg limitation of app installs?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernando]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2010 10:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is this the Samsung Galaxy 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[@pachi72 Good Question, I didn't even think about that!  hmmm... I wonder also...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Galen20K]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2010 1:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is this the Samsung Galaxy 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Don't digg Sammys]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bustafone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2010 10:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is this the Samsung Galaxy 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[no physical keyboard, no thank you]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yyandrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2010 11:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is this the Samsung Galaxy 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Samsung still has 2nd/3rd class graphics in there behind PowerVR, Qualcomm, and vaporware Nvidia, so using their own SoC means this thing is going to under-perform.  At least they do put out SDKs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NuShrike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2010 4:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is this the Samsung Galaxy 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[The spec looks fantastic apart from the camera, what is wrong with Samsung they use fantastic new technology like amoled screens but still insists on using 5 megapixel cameras, I have had the i900 & i8000 and the photos inside or in low light are rubbish & blur easily, will they please use at least 6 megapixel & please will Samsung please put a xenon flash on a Smartphone PLEASE.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2010 5:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is this the Samsung Galaxy 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[After the way they abandoned the first Galaxy they will have a hard time finding anyone willing to buy it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Bell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 30th 2010 10:43AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
