http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/ Engadget Comments for Nintendo said Ninten-no to Project Natal in 2007? http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/
For example, a Mocap system that do only half of the Natal promised feature can cost over $30k green ($30.000).

]]>Jan 28th 2010 7:24AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 7:34AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 9:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 9:51AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 7:30AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/
Nintendo is behind the times; no wonder they turned down something innovated!]]>Jan 28th 2010 7:31AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/U are right. But we all grew up with Nintendo we don't want them to fail. Microsoft is like the big brother and Nintendo is the little brother. I don't like Sony that's just my opinion. I'm afraid the only way Nintendo can bring tough competition of they loose their "baby" name. Unfortunatly I don't see that day coming. I have an Xbox 360 and a wii guess which is used more. ]]>Jan 28th 2010 8:48AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/
I like my Tatsunoko vs Capcom, No More Heroes 2 and Mad World.


But you know. I love soccer moms too.

]]>Jan 28th 2010 9:19AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/
They even had enough power to bar developers from working on titles for competing platforms, otherwise they lost the license to code games for the NES.

Nintendo was so intrinsically linked to video gaming that playing games was often referred to as 'playing nintendo' (cringe). Sega were the underdogs of the day.]]>Jan 28th 2010 9:46AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 12:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/
Those XSUX DEEP SHITTYs and GAY MUTATION FREEs of yours just suck. Wait until the world wants a better video gaming experience.

The DEEP SHITTY just has one button so all you can play is Onekey by Nitrome, and you can't if there's no wireless connection. Plus, the media playback sucks. You can only play randomly selected videos and music (plus slideshows) by pressing the button three times in three seconds.

The GAY MUTATION FREE is Soapy's free console geared towards gay people looking for Free! It does all types of gay stuff like making men kiss each other.

On the other hand, Wii is a simple gaming experience, damning those who get in the way. Look at wii.com for more info.]]>Feb 25th 2010 6:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/
I was under the impression Natal was developed by MSR?]]>Jan 28th 2010 7:31AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 7:32AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 7:35AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 7:35AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 7:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 7:38AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 7:41AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/
Once Natal and the Motion controller for the PS3 come out, the Wii is going to be relegated to SNL skits.]]>Jan 28th 2010 7:51AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/
Don't you see? Nintendo has fooled the entire market. MS and Sony had to play catch up, and by the time they do, the new Wii will be released.

Going from worst to first in 6 years is nothing to guffaw about. Now if Nintendo were really looking to change the game again, they'd go back to normal controllers next gen while MS and Sony try and catch up with motion control. That would be funny.]]>Jan 28th 2010 7:58AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/
Does that mean the Wii2 will have games that are fun to play?]]>Jan 28th 2010 8:21AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/idk what ur talking about snl is prettty funny. The ps3 wand looks like a copy of the wii with a camera. Natal does look cool though]]>Jan 28th 2010 8:51AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/
Typical response from a wii-less one.]]>Jan 28th 2010 9:04AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 9:15AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/
To say there are no fun games for the Wii is quite an exaggeration. Don't care if you owned one or not. I own a PS3 and a Wii. The Wii gets far more playing time when friends are over, and the P3 is my lone wolf mcquade console.

]]>Jan 28th 2010 12:06PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/
And your point...

You don't seem friendly. Once, my cousin had to ship his 360 back to Microsoft HQ to get it fixed.

Oh and the Red Ring of Murder will murder your Natal experience. If you do need to use Natal, go to Brazil.]]>Feb 25th 2010 6:36PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/
It looks like MS made the same decision Nintendo did about the hardware being too expensive, but because their system has spare CPU power, they were able to cut costs by reducing the hardware required for the add-on.]]>Jan 28th 2010 7:51AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/
You can't exactly take a third-party hardware system and simply plug it into the Xbox and assume it'll work...]]>Jan 28th 2010 8:25AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 8:26AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 8:50AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/
Well probably because you're stating the obvious. That's like bashing the 360 because it doesn't have motion controls. It's stupid.

Besides that, you're talking about the iPhone, which is a horrible gaming platform. Yeah it's more powerful than the DS. The Atari Jaguar was more powerful than the SNES.

]]>Jan 28th 2010 9:24AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 10:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 8:30AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 10:33AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 11:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 12:02PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/
Yeah, "rarely innovate" says the guy holding a controller in his hand basically ripped from the Nintendo template from 25 years ago....]]>Jan 28th 2010 12:08PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 12:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 11:24AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 1:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 2:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 2:33PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/
Eventually, there will be no consoles. Everything will be via the internet. And I don't think it will be "OnLive," which is a good idea, but Microsoft and Sony will pounce on that idea (and they probably have a bigger research, development and marketing budget).]]>Jan 28th 2010 2:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Jan 28th 2010 5:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Feb 25th 2010 6:36PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/It's something Nintendo can ignore but not something Microsoft could, Xbox will test and develop this tech to perfection, then Windows 8 will be watching from your webcam.]]>Mar 5th 2010 10:56AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/nintendo-said-ninten-no-to-project-natal-in-2007/Mar 6th 2010 5:44PM