http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/ Engadget Comments for http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/Don't talk sh*t about companies that could crush yours with one finger. Your 15% market share of OS's doesn't qualify you to talk sh*t about companies with >50% market share AND the biggest search engine in history. Learn your place, Jobs.]]>Jan 31st 2010 3:42PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/
You should watch who you're calling lazy before they get lazy and stop supporting your products.]]>Jan 31st 2010 3:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/Exactly! He's just making enemies as he said, and that doesn't work in relation between companies, nations, or even people. Adobe pulls their stuff from Macs, Microsoft pulls Office... what's left? iPhoto? LOL]]>Jan 31st 2010 3:59PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/It's called the iPod. Oh, and while you're listening, fix iTunes before you complain about Flash.]]>Jan 31st 2010 4:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/Sneaky... you forgot to mention the 250.21B market cap of Microsoft... you must be Republican or something...]]>Jan 31st 2010 4:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/
Of course he won' t mention MS. He is an idiot.]]>Jan 31st 2010 5:08PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/
I want to thank you for raising the standards in the computer industry. I have always used Mac computers until I graduated from college some 12 years when I was forced to use PC because of my company. I have remained a PC user. However, I strongly believe that because of Apple's products that have forced many computer companies to raise their standards in innovation and quality. If Apple was not in the picture, we would all be stuck with Windows 98 right now.]]>Jan 31st 2010 8:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/PDF is a public format so no problems there. I do believe that OS X has built in support for reading PDFs already and problably also for creating PDFs.

The problem would be Photoshop et al but I am pretty sure that Adobe would never dare to ake such a move...]]>Feb 1st 2010 11:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/
Are all our opinions of those richer and more powerful to be discarded?]]>Mar 9th 2010 1:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10017015-92.html and http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20100324/apple-nearing-wal-marts-market-cap/]]>Mar 25th 2010 5:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/Jan 31st 2010 2:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/Jan 31st 2010 2:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/
Sorry if I was immature there but I honestly just typed what I said.]]>Jan 31st 2010 2:32PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/
I agree with your sentiments though - Steve must really not be happy with Google or Adobe. ]]>Jan 31st 2010 2:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/Jan 31st 2010 3:02PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/
I've read almost every one of Engadget's recent reviews, most of which have been written by Josh, and while it is clear Josh enjoys using Apple products, I don't believe there is a bias. Comparing something to one of Apple's numerous products is NOT showing a bias, but acknowledging that much of what Apple creates is used as a comparison by most average consumers. ]]>Jan 31st 2010 3:34PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/Jan 31st 2010 2:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/
I heard he's never actually eaten an apple.]]>Jan 31st 2010 2:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/Jan 31st 2010 2:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/
on topic... I think he should stop acting like a kid and agree that competition is here to stay... and regarding Adobe, maybe he is correct but he can't just ignore the fact that it's not full internet if there's no flash.. at least at the moment.

Don't miss flash that much on my iPhone, but I doubt iPad can't afford to not have it (IMHO)... c'mon it's already lame to allow only one app at a time.. c'mon it's a freaking tablet.. not a phone.

pal :)]]>Jan 31st 2010 2:36PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/Jan 31st 2010 2:50PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/
i'm not sure there is anything really wrong with the google comments taken under the context that these are two competing companies. i'm sure google would love to see the iphone die off in favor of android...and the evil comment to me just really means that there really isn't a "good guy" in business....its cutthroat as hell, and nobody really just wants to play nice with everyone....esp when they are competitors.

although i do think that google and apple could be a huge force together in the html5 vs flash debate......apple continues to ignore flash and google takes youtube to html5 would give it some real momentum.

someone tell me if this is still true (something mentioned in an advertising class of mine) my professor said that when it comes to the way google pulls down search results, flash does nothing to help the accuracy of said search results.....maybe thats an outdated point now, or completely moot if html5 would act the same (or my prof is just totally full of s%$@....but if not, html5 becoming the new standard would be a big help to google's business.]]>Jan 31st 2010 2:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/Jan 31st 2010 2:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/
probably why he couldn't keep the doctors away.]]>Jan 31st 2010 3:04PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/
Wow. He wears a turtle neck all the time, so I have nothing to say regarding his comments other than his black turtle neck that others had been cracking at for a decades.

Yeah, whatever Alexander Calder did was dumb because he wears that same old red polo every time. Right?]]>Feb 1st 2010 9:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/Feb 10th 2010 2:20AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/Jan 31st 2010 2:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=google&word2=apple ! :D]]>Jan 31st 2010 2:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=adobe&word2=apple]]>Jan 31st 2010 2:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/Jan 31st 2010 2:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/Jan 31st 2010 2:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/Jan 31st 2010 2:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/
Yeah, it may be fun to watch all this, but if I had Apple stock, I'd be taking a long, hard look at it. Steve Jobs sounds borderline manic these days, and it makes me nervous. He really seems to believe that he doesn't make mistakes. Pride comes before the fall, so they say...]]>Jan 31st 2010 4:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/I think you are absolutely right. I suspect that the manic behavior of SJ is driven by the steroids that he is on for the transplanted liver. Steroids are some of the most common antitransplant rejection drugs. They tend to provoke this type of submanic state that we are seeing recently. I am curious to what degree the others on the Apple board realize this.

He would need to be replaced quickly before Apple manages to alienate all. ]]>Jan 31st 2010 4:59PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/
what about back in 1997 when he put a target on Dell. At the time Dell was considered unbeatable and apple a has been... You know what happened right? Steve is focused. FOCUS.

Your advice has been what apple haters have been saying every year for the past 10 years! How did shorting apple work ? LOL. ]]>Jan 31st 2010 9:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/
What are you talking about? Where did I say I was an Apple hater, or that I shorted Apple stock? Oh, never mind, you're one of those people. I don't wet myself every time I hear or see the name "Steve Jobs," so I must be part of an evil corporate anti-Apple conspiracy, right?]]>Feb 1st 2010 7:42PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/
Damn right he is. I mean seriously theres no reason flash should make my quad core cpu go up to 80% usage >.> Adobe needs to get their sht together and remake flash from scratch]]>Jan 31st 2010 2:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/
LOL! Just lol.]]>Jan 31st 2010 2:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/Jan 31st 2010 2:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/"It just works"

Bullshit.]]>Jan 31st 2010 4:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/
"No one will be using Flash. The world is moving to HTML5."

Maybe in a few years. But for right now, Flash is what's being used. That's a piss poor excuse.]]>Jan 31st 2010 2:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/Jan 31st 2010 2:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/Jan 31st 2010 2:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/
I don't know Josh, reading some of the comments here, I see a whole lot of ignoring how widespread flash is. ]]>Jan 31st 2010 2:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/Jan 31st 2010 2:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/
Agreed, but sadly when html5 finally becomes widespread people will call him a visionnaire.
But I loved his response on the Google moto "don't be evil".]]>Jan 31st 2010 2:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/Jan 31st 2010 2:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/"No one will be using Floppies. The world is moving to CDs"
You see, Apple always do things first. Remember the iMac didn't come with a floppy drive, everyone got equally outraged. Now with hindsight we can see it was the right choice.]]>Jan 31st 2010 2:24PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/
Doesnt everyone think that Apple should be careful making comments like this when many consider Photoshop to be somewhat synonomous with Apple? I mean if Apple keeps crap like this up, don't you think Adobe will give Jobs the finger and just drop Mac as a platform? I know thats pretty drastic, but I doubt Apple could create a rival to CS that the graphics junkies will love. But Jobs is kind of correct--there is quite a bit that Adobe could do to make a lot of their software offerings much better.]]>Jan 31st 2010 2:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/Jan 31st 2010 2:30PM