<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Samsung's 30nm DDR3 DRAM set to lower costs and power consumption later this year</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Samsung's 30nm DDR3 DRAM set to lower costs and power consumption later this year</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's 30nm DDR3 DRAM set to lower costs and power consumption later this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wish they'd lower costs on cell-phone ram so tight-ass manufacturers would finally put a decent amount in their devices. Seriously, it can' t be a secret of the ages that more RAM = better performance, can it?<br><br>I'm literally baffled, especially with subsidization being such a factor amongst the cell world these days. I know this article isn't EXACTLY pertaining to such a subject, but it is still a valid post considering how we are talking about RAM and lowering costs. You would think there would be a decent solution by now...<br><br>*sigh*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2010 5:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's 30nm DDR3 DRAM set to lower costs and power consumption later this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/</guid><description><![CDATA[Will this work with my iMac?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mtnDewFTW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2010 5:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's 30nm DDR3 DRAM set to lower costs and power consumption later this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good thing they use less power since they still have the daft habit of putting stickers on the chips I see.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2010 5:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's 30nm DDR3 DRAM set to lower costs and power consumption later this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/</guid><description><![CDATA[When should we expect to see DDR4 RAM?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Entourage]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2010 8:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's 30nm DDR3 DRAM set to lower costs and power consumption later this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Entourage I'd estimate 12-24months.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sbrown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2010 9:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's 30nm DDR3 DRAM set to lower costs and power consumption later this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Entourage <br>There will be no 4, it's straight to 5, you can observe it in graphicscards, they had 2 then 3 now 5, 4 didn't do enough to warrant setting up a whole industry up for.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2010 10:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's 30nm DDR3 DRAM set to lower costs and power consumption later this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Steve P Jobs <br>ROADHOUSE]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pickleJar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2010 8:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's 30nm DDR3 DRAM set to lower costs and power consumption later this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/</guid><description><![CDATA[Put it in the new MBP refresh with some Bag of Hurt!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2010 8:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's 30nm DDR3 DRAM set to lower costs and power consumption later this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/</guid><description><![CDATA[Lower-cost and lower-energy RAM? Yes, please. Those $80-$100 prices need to go down.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[whiskers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2010 11:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's 30nm DDR3 DRAM set to lower costs and power consumption later this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/</guid><description><![CDATA[Seriously my ram runs at 1.65v in it's default XMP profile. My DD2 is at 1.8v and my DDR is at 2.1v. Any decrease in voltage is welcomed in my book. Lower power and lower heat.<br><br>Prices do need to go down to previous levels though. I bought 6GB of DDR3 1600 triple channel ram for $87 last year. The same kit now cost $149 on newegg. This is ridiculous. I hope with the more cost efficient manufacturing, we get better price.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[needmoregigs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2010 3:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's 30nm DDR3 DRAM set to lower costs and power consumption later this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/</guid><description><![CDATA[While this is impressive news and the smaller process should help lower production costs, and eventually prices, these aren't the first 1.35 volt DDR3 modules.  G*Skill's ECO series DDR3 ram gives you 1600mhz @ CL7 at 1.35 volts, and has been out for a few months.  I'm not sure who makes the modules (I believe its either Elpida or Hynix), but I can attest to their low voltage qualities as I'm currently running a set in my rig at 7-8-7-24 at 1800mhz and just 1.46 volts.  It's wonderful that Samsung is leading the pack with the 30nm process, if 40nm ram can be that power-efficient, this new ram should be able to go even lower than 1.35...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cruiserdude]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2010 2:40AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
