<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Intel said to be cooking up DDR3-lovin' Atom N475 and Atom N455 CPUs</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/intel-said-to-be-cooking-up-ddr3-lovin-atom-n475-and-atom-n455/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Intel said to be cooking up DDR3-lovin' Atom N475 and Atom N455 CPUs</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel said to be cooking up DDR3-lovin' Atom N475 and Atom N455 CPUs]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/intel-said-to-be-cooking-up-ddr3-lovin-atom-n475-and-atom-n455/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/intel-said-to-be-cooking-up-ddr3-lovin-atom-n475-and-atom-n455/</guid><description><![CDATA[Intel should focus on the battery power for the Atom line, how come these ARM based chip have something like 10x better battery life. maybe the should start building atom CPU to full System On Chip (SOC) solution for cheap power efficient netbooks.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ahmed Alzayani]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2010 2:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel said to be cooking up DDR3-lovin' Atom N475 and Atom N455 CPUs]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/intel-said-to-be-cooking-up-ddr3-lovin-atom-n475-and-atom-n455/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/intel-said-to-be-cooking-up-ddr3-lovin-atom-n475-and-atom-n455/</guid><description><![CDATA[Intel did not re-design the Atom for the "Pinetrail" series. They simply took the DDR2 controller and graphics that were off-chip and put them on the same die. The Atom still has a latency-adding FSB running across the single chip!<br><br>For the in-order design of Atom (that can't fill its idle time with other work) latency is killing performance. The FSB is also taking up power while serving no needed role.<br><br>I think that when Intel gets this DDR3 memory controller on-chip, it will not be using the FSB. This will save power and increase performance by reducing latency. Do not expect much performance increase, due to the market notch that Intel is trying to keep safe and high-profit (full-price notebooks).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[McLogic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2010 1:01PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
