<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for LG commits to Android 1.6 -- not 2.0 -- for Rogers' Eve</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/03/lg-commits-to-android-1-6-not-2-0-for-rogers-eve/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for LG commits to Android 1.6 -- not 2.0 -- for Rogers' Eve</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LG commits to Android 1.6 -- not 2.0 -- for Rogers' Eve]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/03/lg-commits-to-android-1-6-not-2-0-for-rogers-eve/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/03/lg-commits-to-android-1-6-not-2-0-for-rogers-eve/</guid><description><![CDATA[Am I the "Chosen One"?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheGM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 3rd 2010 10:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LG commits to Android 1.6 -- not 2.0 -- for Rogers' Eve]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/03/lg-commits-to-android-1-6-not-2-0-for-rogers-eve/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/03/lg-commits-to-android-1-6-not-2-0-for-rogers-eve/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheGM <br><br>Well, yes and no.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[all things considered]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 3rd 2010 10:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LG commits to Android 1.6 -- not 2.0 -- for Rogers' Eve]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/03/lg-commits-to-android-1-6-not-2-0-for-rogers-eve/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/03/lg-commits-to-android-1-6-not-2-0-for-rogers-eve/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe 1.6 will be "good enough" for the non power user. But yeah, it's a little strange to not be running the same version as other Android phones that are available.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[R]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 3rd 2010 11:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LG commits to Android 1.6 -- not 2.0 -- for Rogers' Eve]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/03/lg-commits-to-android-1-6-not-2-0-for-rogers-eve/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/03/lg-commits-to-android-1-6-not-2-0-for-rogers-eve/</guid><description><![CDATA[Rogers, I guess I'll wait 4 months till Wave wirless or Dave network is up, and I'll get a freakin Google Nexus with 2.0.<br><br>As a Canuck, I'm really tired of getting old tech.  LG and Rogers can suck it.<br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2010 2:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LG commits to Android 1.6 -- not 2.0 -- for Rogers' Eve]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/03/lg-commits-to-android-1-6-not-2-0-for-rogers-eve/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/03/lg-commits-to-android-1-6-not-2-0-for-rogers-eve/</guid><description><![CDATA[@alexz <br>I'm with you on Rogers.  Nevermind that Canadians are in indentured servitude to their carrier with little chance to change.  I've been stuck with Telus for a while (with out paying upwards of $300 to break a contract).  Oh Well, Milestone for me.  Apparently in 2 weeks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Prof_Chaos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2010 1:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LG commits to Android 1.6 -- not 2.0 -- for Rogers' Eve]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/03/lg-commits-to-android-1-6-not-2-0-for-rogers-eve/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/03/lg-commits-to-android-1-6-not-2-0-for-rogers-eve/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good news for us hackers :D <br><br>1.6 has a minimum kernel requirement of 2.6.29 so should be easier to get 2.0 running on it that the current version of the kernel.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MuffinsFTW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2010 11:38AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
