<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Intel teases six-core Gulftown, discusses tera-scale computing</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Intel teases six-core Gulftown, discusses tera-scale computing</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel teases six-core Gulftown, discusses tera-scale computing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why are they telling the photos to die?<br><br>OTOH Clarkdale is a really goofy-sounding name for a processor...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[crapple]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2010 12:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel teases six-core Gulftown, discusses tera-scale computing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/</guid><description><![CDATA[@crapple Haha! Good one. Seriously LOL'd.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2010 12:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel teases six-core Gulftown, discusses tera-scale computing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/</guid><description><![CDATA[@crapple <br>My first thought was, "How will Kodak respond to the death threats?"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ED]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2010 5:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel teases six-core Gulftown, discusses tera-scale computing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/</guid><description><![CDATA[@crapple so much hate]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Js]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 9:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel teases six-core Gulftown, discusses tera-scale computing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm surprised that 6-core is still going to fit in a LGA 1366 socket.  I know the Opteron 6-core that was released a while back had a different socket configuration, and AMD's prototype 12-core CPU had an entirely different socket pin layout.<br><br>Is it because of improved die size-- 32nm perhaps?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[octoberasian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2010 12:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel teases six-core Gulftown, discusses tera-scale computing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/</guid><description><![CDATA[@octoberasian That's correct. The 32nm Gulftown will actually have a smaller die size (240mm squared) that the current high end quad-core Core i7s.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vladislav Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2010 1:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel teases six-core Gulftown, discusses tera-scale computing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/</guid><description><![CDATA[at this point, developers are going to need some sort of seperate processor to dictate where each core diverts its attention to where]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[captain underpants and the bringdown gang]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2010 1:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel teases six-core Gulftown, discusses tera-scale computing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Captain Underpants and the Bring<br><br>They use the sixth core for precognitive computing, it can see 21.175 nanoseconds into the future and route threads accordingly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2010 12:47AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
