<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hate this picture.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Orofar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 12:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dattebayo <br><br>It's either a picture of this or a picture of ATLAS. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[alexicov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 1:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder if it can pound my steak for me before I cook it...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Techie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 1:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[*Looks around*<br><br><br>Hey, the world is still here! In your face, doomsayers!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nitesh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 12:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Nitesh <br><br>in an alternate universe, the earth has already been destroyed by the LHC]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Phan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 12:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@nicholasphan  In an alternate universe, a stale cookie also caused the extinction of the human race.  What's your point?  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 1:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Nitesh<br><br>I honestly expected the end in 2012 to be caused by the LHC but now they get out of the affair by simply having a power break in 2012.<br><br>Now the end is even more uncertain!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cence]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 3:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Nitesh Uh, the world is still here because they haven't started looking for the Higgs Boson yet.  It's only running at something like 25% power.<br><br>The fact that they're finding an "unexpected" number of particles already is frankly kind of worrying.  Gee, what other "unexpected" results might they find as they ramp this thing up?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 4:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[Its always good when a potential doomsday device produces "unexpected" results!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 6:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Nitesh yes and "unexpectedly" is the kind of stuff you don't want scientists to be getting from their results.<br><br>At least we won't even notice when we are gone...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ridgecity]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 7:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Apocalyptic 0n3  <br><br>In another universe the LHC is a cat.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 9:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@skylined  <br>In another universe the LHC is known as the Large Hardon Collider.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dafrety]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2010 12:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@nicholasphan  um, if something isn't physically possible, then it can't happen in any parallel universe. this thing does not have the abilities to produce an earth swallowing hole]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[evan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2010 4:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bowdown  <br>What if we were the 1st fo the parallel universes to try it, and we're the ones that blew everything up?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Julio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2010 11:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Apocalyptic 0n3  Actually, it was OUR LHC that ended another world in an alternate universe.  We just have to make sure none of them activate THEIR LHCs and end our world!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2010 11:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Gigaflop  In that case we need to built 5 more before the others will!<br><br>LHC arm race GO!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beastage]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2010 12:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hey, they still have a little over two years of increasing collisions to end the world!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Naris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 12:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am planning to go into astrophysics and areas like that so i love it when engadget does these articles. Personally i think smashing together two atoms at near the speed of light has more action and fireworks than any  Michael Bay movie.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[0to60]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 12:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@0to60 <br>transformers 3, higgs boson strikes back]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[andres]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 1:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@weirdo557  You, sir, win the day.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[uagent]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 3:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[So can we say that no higgs boson exist and move on to a higgsless model yet or must we continue these shenanigans]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[edu3000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 12:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Edobe <br>Physicists love unifying models. They've been trying to make one since Newton. <br><br>Right now, the higgs boson is literally the only stray link in their all unifying model. They have the quarks and leptops as their contituents of matter. Forces are mediated by the exchange of particles, and the lifetime of these exchange particles dictates the range of the force. So there are gluons for the strong force, the W and Z bosons for the weak force, and photons for coulomb force. The only force that is missing an exchange particle is gravity.<br><br>Now if they find this higgs boson, they have the beginnings of a unifying theory for mass, energy, and force. Basically this would be like e=mc^2 or Quantum Physics  for the 21st century. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shyam D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 1:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@M3  This theory is largely already there and it's called the Heim Theory and it is higgless. Although the theory is still debated, some scientific research has shown that it might be correct: <a href="http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/GSP/SEM0L6OVGJE_0.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/GSP/SEM0L6OVGJE_0.html</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Blacky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 1:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Black  <br><br>Unfortunately that theory has had little to no peer review. There have been higgless models in the past. But, a Higgless model doesn't really sit well with the particle physics community. Thus the general conception in the community is that it exists, it just hasn't been found yet. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shyam D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 2:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Black  <br>Thanks for the link to the article.  Chuckled at mention of the "London moment"... maybe they can use that for a tourism promotion video, lol.  <br><br>If I read the article correctly, it appears that they were able to generate some sort of a "strong" gravitational field.  I wonder if it's possible to "reverse" it and make a flying saucer... or use the effect to produce artificial gravity in space...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[onlymyrailgun]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 2:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[I always thought it was funny how in high school we're taught that there are only 4 particles.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[B3astofthe3ast]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 12:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@B3astofthe3ast <br>4 PARTICLES!?<br>Well "La De Da" Mr. private school. My high school only had 3 particles and we got by just fine.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NeoJew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 1:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@NeoJew  Well, we were taught about the proton, neutron, and electron, and they briefly mentioned the photon.  So thats 4.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[B3astofthe3ast]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 1:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@B3astofthe3ast  <br>No positrons or anti-protons?  Damn, Asimov and other sci-fri writers would be turning in their graves!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[onlymyrailgun]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 2:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@onlymyrailgun  Nope, not until I decided to take a relativity course in my senior year.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[B3astofthe3ast]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 2:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[Physics gives me a hadron.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xbit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 12:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@xbit <br>I see what you did there....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[imacmatt09]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 12:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@xbit <br>maybe you should visit the large hardon collider]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[andres]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 1:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@weirdo557  <br>I call homo >.>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[delphinus87]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 1:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@delphinus87 <br>What? You never have hadrons when you get physical?<br>I feel so sorry for your (lab) partner. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Phoenix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 2:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think the Twitter-powered popcorn popper wins hands down against this.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Freakin Ijit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 12:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA["In particle physics, mesons are subatomic particles composed of one quark and one antiquark. They are part of the hadron particle family—particles made of quarks. The other members of the hadron family are the baryons—subatomic particles composed of three quarks. The main difference between mesons and baryons is that mesons are bosons while baryons are fermions—that is mesons have integer spin while baryons have half-integer spin—meaning that the Pauli exclusion principle does not apply to mesons."<br><br>Will ... i think i have a lot of readings ahead, the simple high school image of spherical atoms composed of electrons circulate nucleus  (protons and neutrons) are no longer valid.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ahmed Alzayani]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 1:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ahmed Alzayani <br><br>those weren't even valid when you learned them]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian (PC gamer  extraordinaire)]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 1:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[Anyone else notice the unusually large number of earthquakes lately?<br><br>hmm...<br><br>;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[palehorse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 1:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[Someone school me...<br><br>What does stuff like this give to me, the consumer? or what does this do for humanity?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plazmic Flame]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 1:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Plazmic Flame<br><br>This does not have anything to do with the typical consumer. Because this is pure science and has nothing to do with production of mass market equipments. However, if the theory is established, then in some not so distant future, it will surely trickle down to some technology for the masses.<br><br>That has been the case with all of science, all the time. Because this is not Steve Jobs showing off iPad, but much much bigger than that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sourav]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 1:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Plazmic Flame <br>I am only replying so I can be updated when someone answers your question. I want to know the same thing. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Absolute92]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 1:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Plazmic Flame <br><br>The person who invented the laser was working at MIT, and had his grant request denied on the base that "it's a useless experiment" by the Dean at that time. If he didn't continue following through we'd still be using VHS tapes to lug around our videos.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[alexicov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 1:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Plazmic Flame School you?  You would have been asking the same question if you had been watching Edison fly his kite.  How are we supposed to school that? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[davidD3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 1:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Plazmic Flame <br><br>It's give us a better understanding of the subatomic world and Quantum mechanics which will help us in many fields including nano technology.<br><br>The closet thing i can think of .... that LHC will help us in consumer electronics area, is to help us in resolving quantum tunneling issue once CPU's reaches a half-pitch of 11nm or less. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ahmed Alzayani]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 2:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@davidD3  <br><br>for the consumer?<br><br>nothing, at least not now, for humanity? Knowledge that will be shared among all countries freely (minus the billions it cost initially of course..).<br><br>think of this, if they can learn enough to control things like mass, we will be able to go into deep space in a matter of years, and not billions of years per journey!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian (PC gamer  extraordinaire)]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 2:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Plazmic Flame : Basic science like this gave us everything from electricity to bigger hard drives and Internet porn.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Argot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 3:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Plazmic Flame <br><br>Do you think all of the technology we have today just came out of nowhere?  No, it came from ideas made possible by our understanding of physics?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ddub]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 4:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[In best Bill Nye voice: "Science Rules!"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pcwolff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 1:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/07/report-large-hadron-collider-producing-tons-of-awesome-collisio/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm certain that lone fire extinguisher will save us from imminent destruction. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Luke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2010 1:19PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
