Engadget - Comments for Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100 http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/ Engadget Comments for Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100 http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif Engadget http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 12th 2010 8:31AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/
thats one shitty car]]>Feb 12th 2010 8:36AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/
If I had $1100 I'd buy a hoe, not a shitty car.]]>Feb 12th 2010 8:55AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 12th 2010 10:22AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 12th 2010 11:33AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 12th 2010 8:37AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 12th 2010 8:47AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Let's all hope e-Ink starts to emerge from gray-on-gray and into something even more readable. The images here hint that may be the case, but how 'bout if we bubble the real info about this right up to the top?]]>Feb 12th 2010 1:55PM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 12th 2010 9:13AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Turn it round? ]]>Feb 12th 2010 10:21AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/
Hire this man!]]>Feb 12th 2010 8:07PM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 12th 2010 9:14AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 12th 2010 9:22AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 12th 2010 10:24AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 12th 2010 9:18AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 12th 2010 10:14AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 12th 2010 9:22AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 12th 2010 12:07PM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/it's probably got platinum not gold...
platinum bullion 1513
gold bullion 1094]]>Feb 12th 2010 7:57PM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 12th 2010 9:37AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 12th 2010 9:46AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 12th 2010 9:52AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 12th 2010 10:15AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 12th 2010 9:53AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/
Can't forget the roll of duct tape]]>Feb 12th 2010 10:41AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 12th 2010 10:22AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 12th 2010 11:18AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 12th 2010 11:56AM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 12th 2010 12:01PM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 12th 2010 2:54PM<![CDATA[Comments on Brother's SV-70 e-book reader is a little bit cheaper, still $1,100]]>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/brothers-sv-70-e-book-reader-is-a-little-bit-cheaper-still-1/Feb 13th 2010 12:04AM