<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope this gets leaked...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Platinum_Skeet]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@PlatinumSkeet Me too.  We need this yesterday!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MBN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@PlatinumSkeet <br>me too, i dont have any real problems using the browser on my tour, but cant complain about something better :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[d889]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 4:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks really good. I would say this is where a touch interface has the advantage as all those clicks to zoom in look tedious and scrolling a mouse ALL the way across the screen with so many swipes looks cumbersome also.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[welcome to the family  blackberry users]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DefPo3t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[Still doesn't look as good as Opera Mini. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bobby]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@GTYellowJacket9 <br><br>Those menu's in Amazon would not have worked on Opera Mini.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@GTYellowJacket9 yeah, opera was good yday, this is good today!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[unwynd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks ok, or at least almost good as Opera Mobile on Symbian<br><br>Nice to see so many mobile browsers performing better than the desktop IE8 at the moment!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Jamma <br>Just loaded up acid 3 on firefox and it got a 94/100.  100/100 is pretty impressive for any browser.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Delta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 8:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[thank god. the standard browser is pretty awful and Opera Mini isn't a whole lot better. can't wait for this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kojo87]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[Blackberry's touchscreen game is nowhere to be found. This looks nice, but RIM needs to bring something better to the table than an entire screen that's also a button. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TJM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TJM <br>Guess you missed the release of the Storm2.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bighap]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bighap ...maybe I shouldn't have focused on their initial, failed attempt at a touchscreen phone so much. Sure, the Storm 2's hardware is an improvement, especially alongside software updates like this...<br><br>But RIM seems to have a mentality similar to Microsoft when it comes to phones. They've got a sizeable marketshare, and seem to take a very lax approach to bringing something out that people will really want to use. When I think of the key players in the market who'll still be here in the next few years, only Android and Apple come to mind. Maybe Palm, and maybe Microsoft with thieir 7 Series. <br><br>+1 for WebKit/HTML5 as well.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TJM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TJM  <br><br>I guess you could throw out "Maybe RIM and Maybe Nokia.." and just cover everyone...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hfm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 2:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TJM  <br><br>"But RIM seems to have a mentality similar to Microsoft when it comes to phones."<br><br>MS completely changed their phone strategy with 7 Series, and you're still making this comparison? MS just proved that mentality isn't there anymore. Wow...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike B.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 2:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, it's a decent browser for Blackberrys.<br><br>I guess that's exciting...but if you cared that much about browsing, you're not relying on a Blackberry anyway.<br><br>Rejoice?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jon.athan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[Blackberry's are great at doing e-mail, and messaging but browsing the web on such a small screen just isn't their game.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[XChrisX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@XChrisX It's not the screen size, it's the resolution.  My Bold 9700 has more pixels than an iPhone.  It's plenty capable to provide a good browsing experience.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MBN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@XChrisX <br><br>I have a Blackberry Storm.... Not enough screen space my ass...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Platinum_Skeet]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 5:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@PlatinumSkeet  Agreed, but the standard blackberry form has buttons and a smaller screen.  Unless they change the OS a bit, I don't see the storm becoming one of their flagship products.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[XChrisX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 6:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[by the time this gets released apple, google and palm with have better browsers..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CRACKBERRY]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@young hov 718 <br><br>And as a Blackberry owner/user...this would matter to me how?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KSPRAYDAD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@young hov 718 True, but by that point, will any of them have decent Exchange support?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mmaestro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kspraydad you as a crackberry user will be using outdated tech, like you do now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CRACKBERRY]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@young hov 718 This *is* Google, Apple, and Palm's browser. As long as RIM keeps their browser in sync with the main WebKit branch, they'll be just as good HTML-wise (with speed and rendering) as the other browsers. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mmaestro by then anything is possible. Rimms os needs a overhaul. And 6.0 better be it]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CRACKBERRY]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[YESYESYES<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OsoOto]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[full html5 support? RIM needs to read some tech document first.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[clevin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@chrislevin I'm sure they would read those tech docs if Adobe would let them be released.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[nooo! they stole webkit from winmo!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lpppppl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[<br><br>Adobe, that's the sound of the bell ringing your eminent demise.   Apple rang it once for you already.  More are lines up holding hammers...  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zelannii]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@zelannii <br><br>For flash perhaps...They still have Creative Suite, After Effects, etc..Their bread & butter..flash is very minute...bit annoying not to have it, but not gonna kill them by any means.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CHICHIgetdaYAYO]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 1:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[They're *just* getting around to having a browser that doesn't suck? <br><br>Isn't that like bragging that you recently stopped beating your wife?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[So they stole iris from winmo to create a browser that actually works for an OS no one wants anymore?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[l3it3r]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@l3it3r RIM has sold over 50 million Blackberries, and have over 20 million customers. Where do you get your information?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PancakeMix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 1:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@l3it3r that is about as funny and original as "whats a Zune?" just because you don't use a BlackBerry doesn't mean that nobody does.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kojo87]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 1:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[WebKit is good and stuff, but the most important thing of WebKit is that it is easily updatable.<br><br>Also, will there be NPAPI support for plugins like Flash 10.1?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[The bottom line is blackberry needs a better touchscreen experience. It can't even compare to that of a Droid or iPhone. RIM needs help. Maybe Microsoft will buy them out. It would only them.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sw1storm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@sw1storm "blackberry needs a better touchscreen experience"<br>says you<br><br>Or they're the only one who still caters to the consumer who dosn't want or need a touchscreen]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KeegdnaB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 1:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@KeegdnaB  I sell mobile phones, and I gotta agree with you there.  So many customers come in looking for a good phone without a touch screen.  Young customers love a touch screen but those who didn't grow up with a cell usually don't want anything to do with a touch screen.<br><br>long story short... sw1storm, you are not the only customer of these companies. you are one of millions and the other several millions don't want what you want.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[schultz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2010 7:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[Full HTML 5 would mean OGG/Vorbis video, right? Show me a demo of that and I'll cream my pants. This + BES Free = long time coming.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Epon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 1:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Epon <br><br>No.   HTML5 doesn't support specific codecs.  Ogg support was removed from the spec b/c of objections from certain companies (one of which was Apple).   So now it is up to the browser/engine developer to specify which codecs  they support.  IIRC, webkit supports h.264 while Gecko supports Ogg Theora.   I think Opera was going Ogg too, but I'm not sure.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[scyber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 1:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@scyber  Ohhh well that's fine. I don't really care about the codec, but the chance to have embeded video is sexy. At least while we wait for Adobe to push something out ::eye roll::]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Epon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 2:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[Finally, now hurry up and release it!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason F]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 1:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@gernblanston  I wouldn't hold my breathe on this. BB may very well take an entire year or longer to release this with some future Curve device. Us current users, I doubt well get the upgrade because I am as sure as pie that this new browser will not be compatible with current BB devices. BB already needs a new phone lineup, touchscreen, and a new OS that simple to design for. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jhig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 1:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Jhig  Well, would you hold your breath for it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 1:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[This would fix one of my major complaints about my BlackBerry. Most of the phone is just fine for what I want to do, but to browser is just plain awful.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan P.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 1:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[Though I love my BB, I think Blackberry missed the ball on this one. BB has had a considerable markets share against the others and they just finally decided to develope a desent browser. Other's like Apple and Android came in the game with a above decent browsing experience and now we are suppose to "praise" BB on this minor feet that should had been done two-three years ago. Too little too late on this one BB. Other mobile developers are looking ahead, designing better application base, advanced touchscreens, social apps, while still focusing on the business customers. BB reminders me of Yahoo and MS when Google took over. Yahoo and MS were deers in  headlights. BB is going to end up like Palm, resting on it laurals ... but even Palm learned its leson, at least they are activley competing with the Big Dogs of Apple and Goolgle in the mobile market. Tisk, tisk BB. My next phone will be Apple or Google.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jhig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 1:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/rim-demos-new-webkit-based-blackberry-browser-at-mwc-its-fas/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pushing a mouse cursor around on a mobile phone screen looks so much last century to me but it's great to see RIM hoping on the WebKit-train. It's the best one they could have taken and some better implementations/devices may follow very soon. <br><br>In short: It's a good day for RIM and for mobile web browsing in general. <br><br>HTML5 rules and I wish IE9 came out yesterday, with a companion named "subIE9killswitch". Being realistic, let's hope IE9 will at least sport some HTML5-capabilities, especially the video-tag and h.264 ... Afterwards only Mozilla would have to surrender in the pending question of video-format and HTML5's path to victory was free. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mactechgeek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 1:34PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
