http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/ Engadget Comments for Canon EOS-1D Mark IV survives marathon 33 page review http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/Feb 22nd 2010 10:53AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/Feb 22nd 2010 10:56AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/Feb 22nd 2010 11:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/
Night performance is completely outstanding. It's lust a first-sight.

Daytime performance? I want to pull my hair out. It has a serious tendency to focus about 2 inches behind my subjects all the damn time. I'm continuously tweaking the custom functions to find where the issue may be, but I'm still coming up short.]]>Feb 22nd 2010 11:26AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/Feb 22nd 2010 12:06PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/
If it does seem to be tied to a specific lens you should be able to do micro adjustments for it. At least I can do this on my 50d, I could only image that it would be on this one too.]]>Feb 22nd 2010 12:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/Feb 22nd 2010 11:20AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/Feb 22nd 2010 11:28AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/Feb 22nd 2010 11:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/Feb 22nd 2010 11:42AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/Feb 22nd 2010 11:57AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/Feb 22nd 2010 1:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/Feb 22nd 2010 12:33PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/Jeez

Still waiting for mine, scrapping the 5D II because of it's slow auto focus.

I skipped the 1D III, still have the 1D II, though the shutter is on the fritz after half a million exposures or so.]]>Feb 22nd 2010 1:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/
Total: 89%

Good for: Pros
Bad for: Pros working in low light conditions. ]]>Feb 22nd 2010 1:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/what are you talking about?!]]>Feb 22nd 2010 2:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/Feb 22nd 2010 2:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/Feb 22nd 2010 2:36PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/
In helping with getting rid of that jelloish image I just picked up a shoulder support from Habbycam.com and it solved the problem.]]>Feb 22nd 2010 1:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/I bet it helps greatly but $250 for a simple SD camera brace? One can probably make one of those for like 20 bucks. I just might.]]>Feb 22nd 2010 2:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/Feb 22nd 2010 2:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/
Well I could have done that, but honestly I wanted something to match the rest of my gear and this got the job done. ]]>Feb 22nd 2010 2:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/haha yes, it won't look that good ;)
I'm planning on making a dolly soon and if I have the time I'll give the shoulder brace a try]]>Feb 22nd 2010 2:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/]]>Feb 22nd 2010 2:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/
I just wanted them to fix the video! I originally was a Nikon User but I gave up and made the switch to Canon because I wanted the HD Video capabilities. On my old D300s it was grainy, compressed, and completely worthless. ]]>Feb 22nd 2010 3:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/Some people do need more than 12Mps though, but the 22 mp of the 5D MkII are just too many for me, the files are annoyingly big, the 1D IV is ok though, 1Ds II file size, should be ok.

And best, depends on what you need it for, IMO. A P65+ on any given camera is a lot better image and resolution wise, is that the best in the world?
Not for me, at any rate.
]]>Feb 22nd 2010 3:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/
all 4 survivors will need to team up to take it down :)]]>Feb 22nd 2010 1:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-survives-marathon-33-page-review/
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-10048-10484

and Scott Bourne's rebuttal:
http://photofocus.com/2010/02/18/a-response-to-rob-galbraiths-canon-autofocus-article/

]]>Feb 23rd 2010 1:47AM