<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[Class 4 (referring to minimum write speed), ouch.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[beq]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 10:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[@beq <br><br>seems absurdly low.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Excelsium]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 10:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[@excelsium <br><br>Very slow xfre rate.  <br><br>Where are the 32GB micro sdhc cards?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HerbieC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 1:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[@beq All my SD cards are Class 6. Makes a big difference. You can get a 32 GB Class 6 SHDC card for $80.<br><br>At 15 MB/s it would take 71 minutes to copy over a full chip. Yikes. This thing needs Class 8 or whatever. Bigger cards need faster transfer, not slower. <br><br>You can get CF cards that can read and write greater than 70 MB/s. SD cards really have some catching up to do. I will be passing on these things until they can get the speeds up and prices down.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ArtInvent]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 1:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is it me or is 15MB/s a slow transfer speed? I get around 50MB/s taking files off of my camera's SD card. :/]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mKTank]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 10:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mKTank x2, I also had the idea that SDXC started with a much higher transfer speed...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Onesolo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 10:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[how fast is it? can i stick it in one of those adapter and use this as a boot drive? anyone tried that with other mem cards?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[darkstar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 10:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dark star <br><br>Folks use flash cards as boot drives, but you need to understand the wear issues associated with doing that and the fact that it's usually REALLY slow doing that as well.<br><br>If done improperly you can really run a flash card into the ground using one for an OS drive, so read up on the subject!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[strider_mt2k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 11:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dark star omg look @ the pic]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sss8]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 11:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wake me up when the 1Tb comes out. I need to take over 100,000 photos. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GenericMessage]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 10:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[@GenericMessage <br><br>It's probably more to do with HD video than photos.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 10:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Tes  <br><br>I am very well aware.<br><br><br>But 1Tb is still around 75 hrs of HD]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GenericMessage]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 11:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[Look, I have a Pandora on the way, so...GIMME!!<br><br>WAIT<br><br>Gimme TWO!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[strider_mt2k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 11:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[@stridermt2k<br><br>lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[skyblaze]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 11:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would never pay that ridiculous amount just for a faster transfer speed and 15mb/s is SLOW :S]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JustThatNerdyGuy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 11:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[@JustThatNerdyGuy <br>I'm sure there's a ton of stuff you wouldn't pay for.<br><br>This is for people who have already spent $20,000+ on their cameras, not your average hobbyist.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 1:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[WOW, that's a low price!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hiroshi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 11:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[Makes a 64GB SSD look decently priced.  I wonder if they could make a SDXC to USB adapter that you could plug into a USB enabled SSD.  The far simpler route would be to have a camera that supported USB storage devices then you could just plug your regular old USB flash drive into the camera.  Cheaper storage and better read/write speeds.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kal326]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 11:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[What can you honestly expect?  Cramming 64 gigs into that tiny enclosure comes at a price. In this case that come as slower speed and a higher retail price.  Still a better deal than the 64 gig CF extreme card from Sandisk that goes for a cool $599.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dane]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 12:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dmgabe But you can get a 70 MB/s CF card at 32GB capacity for just over $100. That's four times the transfer rate of this SDXC.<br><br>71 minutes to transfer a full card. Think about that. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ArtInvent]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 1:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ArtInvent  <br><br>True, it is faster, but they also have something like 8 or 9 times the amount of space to work with. I'm not saying that this card is great, but given the size restraints, and prices of comparable capacities, in different formats, it isn't too far off the mark.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dane]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 2:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[Seriously overpriced. Seems ridiculous. I can't imagine them selling even one. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tangerinescream]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 12:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Tangerinescream <br><br>This is a great example of where you should buy 2 of an item that is half the capacity. As noted you can get significantly better performing 32GB cards for $80-$100. For most people that would make way more sense than spending twice as much and receive significantly worse performance.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bjsguess]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 4:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bjsguess  <br>and along with that at least if you lost one of your two 32 GB cards then you wouldn't lose all of your data, although the same cannot be said for one 64 GB card. So buying two 32 GB cards if cheaper, faster, and safer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sxestudios]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 8:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[can any1 tell me what is the best sd card i should get for my new d90 which i just bought it.<br><br>Can you guys recommend me some must have accessory too..<br>thanks a lot]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Neraz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 2:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[@neraz <br>I've had my D90 for about 6-months now. It's a fantastic camera for it's price. Good low-light performance, Surprisingly decent kit lens. <br>I'm not 100% on which card gives the best performance per dollar for the camera, but I can recommend some items to greatly help you photo-taking experience.<br>Flash: The on-board flash is pretty abysmal for any serious flash photography. An external flash is highly recommended. I'm using a SL-600, myself.<br>Filters:  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[logichazard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 7:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[@logichazard  <br>Filters: pretty self explainatory (CFL, Polarizer, UV)<br><br>I'd also recommend a R1 strap from Blackrain. It makes it much easier to lug that thing around all day. (especially if you've got any large after-market lenses attached.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[logichazard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 7:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[1 TB - the price it's unknown ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ango]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 3:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[is this compatible with any current device?<br><br>as a matter of fact, if they were to make an 64GB microSDXC card, would it be compatible with recent phones? e.g. Motorola Droid, HTC Hero, Google Nexus One]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[terrence1019]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 5:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[which is a Samsung.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JOe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 9:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SanDisk ships 64GB Ultra SDXC card for $350]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/22/sandisk-ships-64gb-ultra-sdxc-card-for-350/</guid><description><![CDATA[Which is a Samsung Memory Card.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JOe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2010 9:34PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
