<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Audio issues?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Verythrax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 11:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Verythrax Batman didn't like the Realtek card at first but Joe managed to install it when we gave it back to him. That was the only issue I saw.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 11:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Nilay Patel  <br><br>11 inch "gaming" laptop? Can you please explain the stupidity? If you're after a gaming laptop, you aren't looking for lightweight or a tiny screen. What's the point of this exactly?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Almo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 12:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Almo <br>Portable gaming laptop. I personally don't consider something that weighs 13 pounds/5.8KG a portable gaming laptop. Especially considering that most of them only have around 2 hours of battery life so you have to be by some sort of outlet all the time. Atleast thats how it was with my buddies M17X.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mobious]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 12:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Almo  You really don't see how people who like gaming would also like a nice small and light portable machine?  Heck, some people don't even want to carry anything bigger than a PSP, but they still like to be entertained.<br><br>And I fail to see how this considered expensive, compare the specs and price to a less portable Macbook.  And Dell rarely sells for full MSRP.  Speaking of Macbook though, I think they tie on vanity mirror displays... woah!!! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ducman69]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 12:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Nilay Patel  <br><br>I would like to live in your world . . . I think you see all gadgets as their appropriate car match-up. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bolezhinkov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 12:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Almo  <br><br>I no right! screen is wayyy to small, and I can't see anything. PSP is ultra terrible, to. How'm I supposed to see anything, and why would I want to play games on the go?<br><br>(If you can't feel the sarcasm, this is a reminder of it.)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HardToBelieve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 12:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Verythrax The M17x had the same glitch with audio, hopefully this one has a clean slate. This review says it all, although as a gamer, I could use some test-engine running some high-end games for me to see it fully. All in all this laptop is one of the best. Let the invasion begins: <a href="http://bit.ly/alienware-m11x-gamers-dream-opinions" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/alienware-m11x-gamers-dream-opinions</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[angelinecornes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 2:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Verythrax <br><br>If that was a mac laptop the article would have slammed the reflective screen. Since engadget sux the MSFT boobie, they don't take offense to it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 3:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Almo : Actually, something like this would be exactly what I'm looking for.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Loonie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 4:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Mobious  <br><br>Hit the gym son, 13 pounds isn't that much and you can find decent battery life (2-3hrs) in other DTR laptops, most that weigh less. The M17x is the top of the line and not designed to be away from a wall outlet.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 4:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Almo  Generally smaller means cheaper and just because i like to game doesn't mean i like to brake the bank...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Geek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 6:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Verythrax <br><br>5600 in 06 isn't bad for a fairly low-end gaming laptop, considering a few years ago a GeForce 7900GT pulled 4-5k and cost $300.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Not THAT Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 8:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Loonie  <br>Could you elaborate? Much like Alamo, I'm confused by the appeal: gamers don't like to compromise, no matter the cost (at least, the cost to your physical prowess). Gaming PC's are one thing: monitors come in all sizes, but a gaming laptop? I wouldn't skimp on one, especially in the screen size area. I'm currently rocking an Eee netty and it works as a casual gaming machine (Peggle, even Half-Life 1!) but would I want a similar form factor with more power as a main computer? Nuh-uh. <br><br>tl;dr Give me 17 inches or give me death!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CH3BURASHKA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 9:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ch3burashka  <br><br>As a poor college student who needs a new computer, this is a killer of 2 birds with 1 stone.  In the dorm it's a good gaming PC to play online with fellow college students.  Then its small enough to tuck away in a backpack and lug to class to take notes while being nice on the battery when switched to integrated graphics.  All for just a little over a grand?  Sold.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elthran]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 10:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MrBridge  <br>Ofcourse 13 pounds isn't that much, its not practical for a laptop though imo. But thats just my opinion. I like to carry something light and powerful for college.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mobious]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 25th 2010 10:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[hmm i wouldn't consider this a 'small' laptop at 4.5 pounds. <br><br>the VAIO Z certainly has this beat in terms of performance and looks. but the M11x offers really good value.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Phan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 11:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@nicholasphan Small is a descriptor of volume.  This is a small laptop.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 11:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@nicholasphan <br>Turn on the OC option in the bios and you get a score higher than that of the Vaio Z with the m11x. The OC only brings your cpu up to 1.6ghz (CPUZ) windows reads it as 1.73. Anyways gaming performance the m11x wipes the floor with the vaio z. Its 335 gpu is stronger than the 330 of the Vaio Z.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mobious]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 11:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jonac13  <br><br>ok fine, to be clear it is definitely small compared to most other notebooks. compared to other 11" notebooks it is huge and heavy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Phan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 11:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Mobious  <br><br>yep the 335 gpu is much more powerful than the 330m. <br><br>we're comparing it with the low-specced Z though. the Z can be specced up to i7 cpus. <br><br>i wonder how much of the CPU is used in most games. is ULV enough for gaming then? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Phan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 11:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Mobious  Dude, you need to get your facts straight. Go to notebookcheck.net and compare the GT 335M to the GT 330M. There is an almost indistinguishable difference. I wouldn't even remotely consider that "wiping the floor." Vaio Z has a Core i7 and this thing has a ULV 1.3GHz Core 2 Duo. The Core i7 actually crushes this CPU by a long shot. But I wouldn't consider buying the Vaio Z because it costs twice as much as this thing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Doomtomb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 11:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Doomtomb  <br>Look according to notebookcheck.com the differences between the two are noticable.<br>For example, with FarCry 2 on high settings, the Gt330M avg is around 35 fps while the Gt335m's avg is around 47.7. Another example is Anno 1404, under ultra it avg's around 31.9 while the GT330m avg's around 23.<br>Now the GT335m is avaliable currently only on the Alienware M11x iirc. Considering thats where they probably got their benchmarks from. Its safe to assume they were using the c2d provided with the m11x. Yes the Z's i7 is way more powerful in comparison. But todays games are more GPU intensive then they are CPU intensive. So better FPS in games at a cheaper price. Thats what I call wiping the floor with it? :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mobious]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 11:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@nicholasphan  <br>I won't lie, it would have been better if they provided you with a better CPU but thats what they had to sacrifice for battery life. Now nothing around this size is out today in the market that can provide its gaming potential. The CPU does hold you back a bit but most games today depend on GPU's more than they do CPU's. If they didn't then games wouldn't even run with an AVG of 10 fps on this thing :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mobious]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 12:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Doomtomb  <br><br>No, you need to get your facts straight. The GT335M has 50% more shaders than the GT330M (72 vs 48) so it will have a decent performance advantage.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aznofazns]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 12:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Doomtomb ... really? dude did you even look at the two cards? def a big difference between the two. 182GFLOPS vs 223GFLOPS.. and I believe his point was if you OC a $1000 11" you can match performance of a $2000 13"<br><br>thats the appeal of the m11x]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 12:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@robamb2002  <br>Thank you.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mobious]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 12:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@robamb2002  <br><br>again, the 11" versus 13" thing is misleading. The 13" here is 3 pounds, and the 11" is 4.5 pounds. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Phan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 12:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Mobious  Some of the data on Notebook check is misleading if what you say is true. Look at 3DMark06 scores, 335M avg 6222, 330M 6583. Look at CoD MW2. Both cards claim 35+ fps on high. Look at Crysis Warhead. Both cards claim 7+ fps on Ultra, 45+fps on low. How is anyone supposed to make an informed decision based on this data?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Doomtomb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 12:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@nicholasphan  If weight is your priority, then yes, its an extra 1.5 lb. personally I eat steaks that are more than that :-P footprint is more important to me and the m11x is an inch less (I know its thicker but that again was not MY priority) the size difference to my ailing HP DV2z is literally indistinguishable]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 12:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@robamb2002  <br><br>"is an inch less (I know its thicker but that again was not MY priority)"<br><br>heheheheee.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[3rdman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 12:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Doomtomb  <br>True after all it does AVG a bunch of users scores. So I guess you have to go based on its hardware specifications Doom, the only reason you see the 330 even close to the 335 as I said before, the only laptop that has the 335 atm is the Alienware m11x so that c2d at stock settings is holding it back (bottlenecking it if you will). Once you see a laptop with a core i5 or i7 or anything that won't bottleneck it youll notice the difference much better.<br>When I said hardware specifications as Aznofazns stated, the thing has 50% more shaders. If that doesn't mean its stronger then by that logic there should be no difference between an Nvidia GTX 285 and a 8800GTX.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mobious]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 12:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@3rdman  LOL... just remember "It's not the size that counts. It's how you use it!" ~Sheriff of Rottingham]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 1:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@3rdman  Upvoted!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheBigR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 1:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jonac13  Unfortunately, even in terms of Volume... the new updated Sony Vaio Z is actually smaller than the Alienware m11x... Just multiply the width x length x height... For me personally, Small is in terms of footprint on the table... which the new Sony Vaio Z still beat Alieanware m11x... all at the same time, the Vaio Z has a built in DVD / BlueRay (for the high end model), i5 or i7 processor, and wait for the last one... a 13.1 inches screen with 1600x900 resolutions... So if that don't beat the Alienware, I donno what beat it... I understand the Sony is more expensive, but this is only true in USA and Canada market, if you look at Hong Kong market, the Alienware m11x is being price the same as the new Sony Vaio Z series, which I find it odd, because Dell just price themselves out of the market... Also, you will find the Sony Vaio Z has a better build as well, they took idea from the Macbook Pro and use a uni-aluminum frame as well... and carbon fiber... so all look very very slick... and the Sony implementation of backlit keyboard is much less tacky than Alienware... but I guess that depends on taste, some people might like all the changing light and color... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wowpeter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 1:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@robamb2002  Alienware m11x is an inches less on the width but the Sony is an inch less on the depth (look at the spec)... and if you multply that to get the area (ie: footprint area on the table)... the Sony is actually a smaller machine than the Alienware m11x... this is hard fact... go look it up yourself!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wowpeter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 2:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Mobious  <br><br>I know that Asus will allow you to overclock the SU7300, but will Dell allow you to do it too?  Are you guessing or do you know this for a fact?  If it does, then it makes this laptop more appealing to me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Manny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 2:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@aznofazns  This is also for Doomtomb... both of you are neither wrong or correct... Both GT335M and GT330M are consider mid-range graphics card... The GT335M is indeed a better graphic card than GT330M... but GT335M does not have double the performance of GT330M... GT335 run at a lower clock speed but with more shader, I am guessing it is to reduce heat that the card produce... on the other hand, GT330M run at about 25% higher clock speed but with half as much shader... so the end results... GT335M is still a faster and more efficient card, but not by much as you can see from all the 3D mark score and other benchmarking... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wowpeter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 2:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified)  <br>Its nothing too high, but a feature in the bios called overclock or something boosts up the CPU from 1.3 to 1.6ghz (1.73ghz CPUZ reads it at 1.6ghz while everything else from Windows to Everest reads it at 1.73ghz) and according to the reviews, at only a 1 degree temperature cost under load.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mobious]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 2:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jonac13  <br><br>The Vaio Z is smaller by Volume as well as lighter. Check the math! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bluehaze013]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 4:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@robamb2002  <br><br>11x is an inch less on the side but an inch deeper on the front than the Vaio Z. Notice how 11x looks like an old 4:3 laptop? The footprint is the same but the Z has an 13" screen 11x has an 11". 11x look like a toy next to Z, but I imagine it's more meant for the kids with the design of it anyway.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bluehaze013]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 4:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@nicholasphan <br>I don't know how everybody is looking at this but for 1000 more the Vaio Z has to be better than this laptop. It has to be a 2x better or a bit more. The sad part is that not everybody has 1k more to spend and want a small laptop where you can play some games and by far this laptop is one of the best ones to do that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Narkun]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 6:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@wowpeter  <br>I actually asked Dell HK about the pricing discrepancy (1000 USD (~8000 HKD) vs 14k HKD and they actually had the nerve to say "we have different pricing schemes for different markets".  You'd think they would know the target customer for this laptop would be savvy enough to know about the 799 USD starting price...<br>I would've went out and bought it right away for 1000 USD, but with the markup in HK I'd rather get the vaio z]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[riceman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 8:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bluehaze013  He wasn't saying that the Vaio Z was smaller in comparison, he simply said that the MX11 wasn't small.  Check your reading.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 10:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ricemanhk  Exactly... I actually had quite a fight with Dell Hong Kong over this pricing issue... their initially responds to me is that they claim the computer cost more in Hong Kong because the base spec is better... but I told them, this is a LIE... if you compare spec to spec in the exact same configuration, the Alienware m11x being sold in Hong Kong is 70% more expensive than in USA... later, they realize I am not their stupid consumer and they change their story saying that it is their marketing department decision to price this product at this price... I have already file a complain to the Hong Kong Consumer Consul for their misleading sales tactics... Also, I honestly think Dell Hong Kong think their user is in Hong Kong is stupid... with the price they are charging, no wondering Dell is getting a smaller and smaller market share every day... the funny thing is that, Dell Hong Kong does not do their own marketing, in fact, there is no such thing as Dell Hong Kong... Dell Hong Kong division is being run in Mainland Chinese by the Dell China headquaters in Xi-men. So I think Dell China simply decided to charge the computer the same price in Hong Kong as well as China... but I think Dell China forgot the fact that Dell China will have to pay about 40% more for duty and another 20% sales tax in China, while there is none in Hong Kong... so those extras are pure profit for Dell... so this is a complete rip off... I have been trying for ages to get this onto the media... but I am having difficulty because no one is listening to me... so all I can do as a consumer is to boycott Dell Hong Kong until they fix their Alienware pricing in Hong Kong. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wowpeter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 12:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just what I needed to see on the day that mine is "On FedEx vehicle for delivery."  Can't wait.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Leindurstit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 11:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wish that Alienware logo on the screen wasn't illuminated. Kind of distracting..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 11:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Nel You can set it to black out -- same with the other backlit parts.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 11:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Nel <br><br>the screen seems to be very reflective though]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Phan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 11:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@nicholasphan  <br>Someone should invent a screen that you can toggle to matte with a switch. (I want a patent for that!)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[microlomaniac]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 2:39AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
