<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Nikon CoolPix 'Style' and 'Life' series hands-on</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nikon-coolpix-style-and-life-series-hands-on/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Nikon CoolPix 'Style' and 'Life' series hands-on</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon CoolPix 'Style' and 'Life' series hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nikon-coolpix-style-and-life-series-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nikon-coolpix-style-and-life-series-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes indeed, let's get it on.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[coltjasper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 6:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon CoolPix 'Style' and 'Life' series hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nikon-coolpix-style-and-life-series-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nikon-coolpix-style-and-life-series-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[So it's not called "Style by Jason Wu"?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gregorian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 6:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon CoolPix 'Style' and 'Life' series hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nikon-coolpix-style-and-life-series-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nikon-coolpix-style-and-life-series-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Gregorian <br><br>Wrong company.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spsfinest]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 10:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon CoolPix 'Style' and 'Life' series hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nikon-coolpix-style-and-life-series-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nikon-coolpix-style-and-life-series-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[@spsfinest  <br>Same camera though, pretty much.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gregorian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 10:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon CoolPix 'Style' and 'Life' series hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nikon-coolpix-style-and-life-series-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nikon-coolpix-style-and-life-series-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Everyone but Canon and Pentax]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yule&bellow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 6:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon CoolPix 'Style' and 'Life' series hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nikon-coolpix-style-and-life-series-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nikon-coolpix-style-and-life-series-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Engadget - article idea. Ultra sub compact (or whatever the VERY small/thin cameras are called) shootout/mega comparison. Seems like a lot of camera review sites don't really pay attention to this category. <br><br>Yes, image quality is always a tradeoff, but sometimes a tiny camera makes for a nice portrait snapper while you can keep your bigger camera for more serious/planned photography. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[paul34]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 6:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon CoolPix 'Style' and 'Life' series hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nikon-coolpix-style-and-life-series-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nikon-coolpix-style-and-life-series-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[It seems like there is an awful lot of white-noise in the point-and-shoot market these days. Is there really that much of a demand to necessitate hundreds of model variations across dozens of brands? It seems like this is a CE category that could use a little "thinning out."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 7:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon CoolPix 'Style' and 'Life' series hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nikon-coolpix-style-and-life-series-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nikon-coolpix-style-and-life-series-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[chadw makes an excellent point. Isn't there something to be said for old maxim, "Hit 'em where they ain't"?  As opposed to rolling out so many me-too, me-three, me-four products?<br><br>Nikon has had a bunch of snappy-looking, low-end point 'n' shoots over the past three or four years. There was nothing wrong with their appearance. Their problem was that they earned fair-to-poor reviews from pro reviewers and consumers alike. Nikon would do well to forget about sexy styling and pay more attention to fundamentals and differentiation.<br><br>How about keeping the pixel count moderate, taming overaggressive noise reduction, speeding up in-camera processing, making the camera itself, buttons and legends big enough for a grown man to operate and see comfortably? How about including an optical viewfinder and full manual controls?<br><br>These are ways Nikon or any camera maker could make their models stand out from the me-too crowd, and maybe win some sales away from competitors.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[swa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 8:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon CoolPix 'Style' and 'Life' series hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nikon-coolpix-style-and-life-series-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nikon-coolpix-style-and-life-series-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[These Coolpixes have gotten pretty boring. Well, truth be told, most digicams have.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AJ in the East Bay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 9:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon CoolPix 'Style' and 'Life' series hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nikon-coolpix-style-and-life-series-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nikon-coolpix-style-and-life-series-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[@aubreyq Nikon seems to be exceptionally good at DSLRs but exceptionally bad and P&Ss.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AndrewNoNumbers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2010 11:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon CoolPix 'Style' and 'Life' series hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nikon-coolpix-style-and-life-series-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nikon-coolpix-style-and-life-series-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nikon compact P&S have been quite boring in the past couple of years. All they do is adding megapixel. At least Sony and Fuji are experimenting with techniques to allow less noise at low light, and Canon is doing it with a larger sensor on the S90. Nikon? They put a projector. For a compact P&S, even Panasonic and Samsung are becoming more interesting than Nikon.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pika2000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 4:28AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
