<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[Droid does baby<br><br>and yea, i hope adobe air is on it as well when the update comes]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[robindahoods]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 8:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@robindahoods <br><br>Battery Optimization? Adobe Air? <br><br>Apple is still emotionally preparing itself to even accept flash.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MM OBVIOUS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 9:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@robindahoods Wait... you mean Apple... lied????]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[McPOW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 10:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@robindahoods <br><br>Droid does what? Youtube?<br><br>Hmmm if only you could watch Youtube on the iPhone... hrmm]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 10:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Wesscoast  <br><br>oh im sorry, i meant to say, droid does the "real" youtube]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[robindahoods]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 10:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[Too bad I can't watch this video, being that I'm on my iPod.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Backlin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 11:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@McPOW  Apple lied. Unicorns died.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bosco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 25th 2010 12:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Wesscoast  You can get flash games too.....it's nice if you have kids.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[prashant69]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 25th 2010 12:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@robindahoods <br><br>As does the pre I hope adobe spent just as much time worrying about battery consumption for the pre version, because I have heard of some pre users having energy consumption issues with there battery. <br><br>I haven't but than again maybe I have good luck with gadgets because I haven't had a problem with vista and have been using it for a year now. Anyway I am so happy to see adobe taking the mobile internet seriously. <br><br>until now we all glared in envy at windows and Symbian smart phones sporting the ever so coveted sky-fire browser. Which actually is the one thing I had a very hard time letting go of when I switched from the touchpro to the pre. <br><br>I got over it once I fell in love with webos though :-) and from what I have seen, webos and android seem to do flash in alot more elegant way than sky-fire ever did, but than again i haven't used sky-fire in a while. <br><br>I'm willing to bet they haven't made any improvements to there browser that would stand up to the functionality of the stock webos and android browsers, "pinch to zoom" anyone?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wtgig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 25th 2010 12:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@McPOW  How did apple lie?  3 hours for a flash movie is terrible... over 40% less battery than watching a regular movie on the N1...<br><br>Power and battery<br><br>Removable 1400 mAH battery<br><br>Charges at 480mA from USB, at 980mA from supplied charger<br><br>Talk time<br>    Up to 10 hours on 2G<br>    Up to 7 hours on 3G <br>Standby time<br>    Up to 290 hours on 2G<br>    Up to 250 hours on 3G <br>Internet use<br>    Up to 5 hours on 3G<br>    Up to 6.5 hours on Wi-Fi <br>Video playback<br>    Up to 7 hours<br>Audio playback<br>    Up to 20 hours ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dxdragon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 25th 2010 12:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@McPOW  Correction not Apple Steve Jobs did...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[max1c]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 25th 2010 12:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dxdragon  7 hours of video with wifi off.<br><br>Can you measure how many hours of youtube video can be watched on an iPhone?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gwydion]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 25th 2010 1:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Branhower  ... Vimeo supports HTML5. So visit <a href="http://vimeo.com/9705969" rel="nofollow">http://vimeo.com/9705969</a> on your iPod and click Switch to HTML5 player and it should work fine.<br><br>Open standards FTW.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 25th 2010 1:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Branhower  UNTIL HTML5 actually replaces Flash in 95% of web sites currently using Flash, browsers that expect to be taken serious must support it. I don't see this happening for 3-5 years if ever. Any browser that doesn't support Flash is going to be shunned by the very users the iPad is targeting.<br><br>There's a lot of room for improvement here.. I say, go for it! <a href="http://bit.ly/flash-on-apple-opinions" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/flash-on-apple-opinions</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[reeputee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 25th 2010 2:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@robindahoods  just a test]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[visual]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 25th 2010 4:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dxdragon  <br>Take in consideration that they suggest you get approx. 3 hour playback via wifi, which also takes some battery juice. I don't say that 3 hours is alot but I wouldn't say it's terrible, after all how often you actually watch couple of movies from your phone ^^]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mikachu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 25th 2010 7:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Bosco  HAHAHAHAHAAHAHA]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iSmoke,therefore emit death by breathing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 25th 2010 8:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@McPOW  Apple lied?  10.1 isn't even out.  Hardly a lie.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 25th 2010 9:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@reeputee  I had a sudden flashback to 2004...<br><br>UNTIL Firefox actually replaces IE in 95% of web sites currently optimized for IE, websites that expect to be taken seriously must support it. I don't see this happening for 3-5 years if ever. Any website that's not optimized for IE is going to be shunned by the very users the website designers are targeting.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Krystalex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 25th 2010 12:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@robindahoods  <br>and hulu....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[masta vaan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 8:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[see kids flash isnt so bad after all :)<br><br>lets all worry about html5 in two years time shall we?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BubblegumBalloon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 8:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@BubblegumBalloon <br><br>I thought android did HTML5?<br>At least, i've read it supports some of the tags, and they keep adding more?<br>-Taylor]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor. Yes, Taylor.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 8:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@reader1  <br><br>Don't you do enough talking out of your ass at DailyTech, do you have to bring it here too? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 9:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@reader1  <br><br>you're dumb.  <br><br>and I've seen amazing things done with html 5]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Drybones5]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 9:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@BubblegumBalloon <br><br>not really to concerned about flash games but streaming flash video is HUGE.<br><br>cant wait to see how this develops.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[logicbomb.de]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 9:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Drybones5  <br><br>look it can render a box and it can bend 45 degrees.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PhotoFre@k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 9:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@BubblegumBalloon "Jim Henson had a wait and see attitude and look where that got us: wrong-sounding Muppets."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dale]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 9:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@BubblegumBalloon Not so bad?? Isn't the the N1 normally rated at 7 hours of video playback? That means that Flash is knocking back battery life by 57%<br><br>How is that not bad??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GadgetGeezer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 9:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Taylor Yes Taylor  It does support html5 canvas so far and storage. But not video tags..as far as i know. Check out <a href="http://onecm.com/projects/canopy/" rel="nofollow">http://onecm.com/projects/canopy/</a> on any android phone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kemargrant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 10:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@reader1  <br>And replaced with...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PBB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 10:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@GadgetGeezer  Streaming flash is different from viewing flash. Streaming ANY video will cut your battery life significantly. To be fair, we'd have to download the flash video files first and see how that compares.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ininfinitum]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 25th 2010 12:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@GadgetGeezer  <br><br>Its a hell of a lot better than the ZERO seconds of flash anything that any iPoo product can manage... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 25th 2010 9:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can't wait, it looks very smooth and awesome.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[B3astofthe3ast]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 8:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[yay :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[larskb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 8:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@lars1110 <br><br>D@m right, now if only Droid sport a Silverlight player for Netflick and Olympic game :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PhotoFre@k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 8:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[In Steve defense, that test is a lie. Even if it had video to proves it. And please please do buy them iPad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PhotoFre@k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 8:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@cdf74dc9 <br><br>your mindless obedience scares me]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 9:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[If nexus has flash already loaded when it comes to verizon, I will gladly pay the ETF to pick one up. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[scots79]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 8:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm more concerned as to why I can't fastforward past the buffering...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Seb6554]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 8:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yo dawg, we heard you like online video so we put a YouTube video in your Vimeo video so you can YouTube while you Vimeo.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rafa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 8:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@keyrat <br>(annoying camera moves in and out while pimps make obnoxious gang expressions and lucky marthafocker covers face in disbelief)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TareG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 8:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[Let me get this straight... H.264 is FLASH now?! WTF?!?!?!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Philip Han]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 8:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Philip Han <br><br>Yep, you read it right. Didnt you know? lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dansus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 8:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, I'm confused. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[oghowie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 9:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Philip Han <br>I guess Apple has won]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kemargrant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 10:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[Right, H.264 which can be hardware accelerated by Flash 10.1. Playing H.264 video was never a debate, Flash doesn't add anything there not accomplished by HTML5, it was the things that Flash can't hardware accelerate that have come under fire. Play a complicated flash game for 17 minutes and then we can have a proper debate on the issue.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John McKee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 8:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@johnm <br>Actually Flash does add something videos. It provides rudimentary copy protection by making it harder for a user to save a video. With HTML5, you just right click to save a video. You can't do that with Flash.<br><br>As a developer, this may be a deciding factor to keep using Flash.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 8:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@johnm actually flash does not use hardware acceleration for h.264 on phones and it can do way more then html5]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xstream]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 9:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@johnm BINGO!<br><br>(what he said)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David S.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 10:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/flash-10-1-might-not-be-a-battery-hog-on-android/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jakey  As a user, I will search for a non-flash alternative for the content you're offering.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MaT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2010 10:43PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
