<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[At least you can put Sense on this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Exbloder]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Exbloder <br>Seriously, why are editors and commenters on Engadget confusing TouchFlo 3D with Sense UI?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnTitor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@JeremyBenthem  <br>I might be mistaking, but I think HTC renamed TouchFlo to Sense shortly after the Android phones with Sense on it were introduced.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[drange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 4:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Exbloder <br><br>With the HD2, TouchFLO 3D was renamed to Sense UI, in order to get branding the same across both OSes...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Phoenix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 4:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@JeremyBenthem  <br><br>All new HTC phones come with "Sense UI" not "TouchFlo" regardless whether they are WinMo or Android. My HD2 has "powered by HTC Sense" written on the back.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimbob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 4:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@JeremyBenthem : TouchFlo 3D has been renamed to Sense UI]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brendon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 4:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@drange  <br>thanks, I wasn't sure after the 1st,2nd,or 3rd guy said it]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnTitor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 4:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@JeremyBenthem  <br><br>I could be wrong, and I don't know if anyone's mentioned it, but there are rumors floating around that HTC renamed TouchFlo to Sense several months ago. Take that knowledge with a grain of salt; I don't know if anyone else knows about it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 5:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@haveyouanywool  <br><br>Rumors? Sense is the official name of TouchFLO 3D 2.5. Just look at the official HTC pages for the HD2 and HD Mini; they both say Sense.<br><br>Note that the Sense name only applies to 2.5; 2.0 is called TouchFLO 3D.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jgp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 5:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jgp  <br><br>It was a joke.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 5:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@JeremyBenthem  <br>btw great name... (lost?)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[masta vaan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 6:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Exbloder <br><br>I'd like to put the Sense UI on my Windows Vista Ultimate PC's. That way I'll feel like I actually got something cool out of spending the extra BS money for Vista Ultimate.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[davebach]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 11:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Exbloder <br><br>They should just rename it WinPhoVista and call it a day.  Some like, some don't, but overall: its okay.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Connery]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 27th 2010 12:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Exbloder Not much...<br>I find funny that while Engadger praises Microsoft of having 2 platforms the same does not hold true to Nokia and they cant "just undestand". <br><br>So MS having 2 platforms, one for high end and another one for emerging markets is good? Wow, Nokia *never* did that... not!<br><br>I dunno if the guys here are a bunch of Nokia haters or they just dont like Europeans.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr w00t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 27th 2010 2:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Will you be able to change your wallpaper?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Scrip]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Michael Scrip <br>LOL]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JCerna]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Michael Scrip only 3 times..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dking]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Michael Scrip <br>MS: Then Windows Phone Starter Edition is not for you,<br>We have better options..<br> Windows Phone 7 Ultimate<br> Windows Phone 7 Media Center Edition<br> Windows Phone 7 Mobile Premium<br> Windows Phone 7 Business<br> Windows Phone 7 E without Zune and IE..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pontro!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 4:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Michael Scrip <br><br>Will the starter edition be able to run more apps at a time than the full version?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Decoy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 4:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Pontro  <br>They need to focus on 1 really good OS, and stop focusing on names.  They should fire everyone in marketing.  Then put it in a white box with black letters " Windows Mobile 7 ".  If the OS is good enough, people won't care about the name or the box it came in.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[blog.whitesites.com]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 27th 2010 12:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[I really hate Windows Mobile. I don't care how many apps there are out there for it. It has almost zero usability. The applications are so hard to manage multitasking-wise. And if you are using multiple applications it's very very slow, clunky, and eats your batteries. I'm not much for touch screen keyboards, so I don't like the iphone, but I am very very excited for Windows Mobile 7 Series. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiptup300]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Tiptup300 Zero usability? Really? Because I have been using push-mail and flawless Exchange-synching (calendar, contacts and tasks) and MS Office compatibility for the last five years. That added way more productivity to my working life than any of the gazillion apps that any other smartphone-platform is offering me even today.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrea]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Tiptup300 LOL!  You obviously know nothing about the Windows Mobile development community.  All those things you said are wrong with Windows Mobile have been fixed in some way or another.  It has Zero Usability?  Really?  You are really trying to generalize huh?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pookiewood]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@andreab<br><br>I don't know, maybe my phone is just the worst winMo phone out there. Everyone always says how great winmo is, but my phone runs it like pure ass. Actually I'm almost certain it's just my phone. My phone is the insensitive screen I've ever used. I actually HAVE to push very hard to get it to recognize my button presses.   ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiptup300]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 27th 2010 2:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[people in the developing world suffer enough--they don't need windows mobile 6.5]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[munir]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[This seems odd, since it seems like the only market really where WinMo 6 would have an advantage over 7-Series is the business market, who aren't likely to be the types to buy a "starter" phone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Epsilon-Not]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@EpsilonNot <br><br>Really. Bad move, MS. I would have called it "Windows Phone Enterprise Edition", at least until the point that all the enterprise-class apps are available on the new platform.<br><br>Dumb.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Spiny Norman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Microsoft do you really have to find ways to force everyone to do what you want?<br><br>Cant you just ask really nicely?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kiden]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kiden:<br><br>Sorry guy, I think you're confusing Microsoft with Apple]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jordan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 4:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[I know I am going to get down ranked for this, but can we change the name to Windows Phone FAIL Edition?  Please make this Mobile OS go away, and bring on the Windows 7 version.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[treats!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@treats <br><br>There are lots of very good reasons for keeping 6.5. For starters it lets hardware manufactures make their own interfaces and not have to worry about writing the whole OS. HTC have done an excellent job with Sense, if they can get a cheaper licence on 6.5 and create their own interface on top of it then all the better.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimbob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 4:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[The OS itself is not *that* bad (when used with Sense or other UIs), but the guys and gals at Microsoft who are utilizing this sick naming nomenclature need to be slapped hard with a large trout numerous times.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bureX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hahahaha! Say WhaT??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Windows Vista is "Windows 7 classic"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 4:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[This just re-affirms that one should NEVER buy any software called "Starter Edition", regardless of who makes it or what it is for.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Starter?  Starter?  My Touch Pro 2 is not running Windows Phone Starter Edition.  It's running Windows Mobile!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pookiewood]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Pookiewood yeah, this is seriously a stupid name.  Windows Phone Classic or something like that would have been much better.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gwanatu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Pookiewood Ah, the Touch Pro 2 is freaking awesome, now they're admitting they put a rinky-dink OS on it.  They should give you a free upgrade to Win 7 ASAP!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gmonsquared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 4:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't know guys, my WinMo 6.5 has been used for weeks and it hasn't crashed on me once.<br><br>That's more stable than my PC. That said, it is a modded ROM and I have no idea what you lot are complaining about.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lpppppl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Does this mean we need to watch out not to cook a ROM with these versions of 6.5?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JCerna]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@JCerna That's what I was thinking.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pookiewood]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Very strange. Honestly, if you just take WinMo 6.5.3 and rebrand it as Starter Edition without changing anything, that'd probably be the smartest move here. Don't cut out radio frequencies or Office or restrict it to emerging marketing or some shit. That's just a dick move. Though then again, so is having 7 versions of Office 2010 and 6 versions of Windows 7 with the lower ones being so gimped it's pathetic and the higher ones being so expensive they break the bank.<br><br>In other words, I wouldn't put a move like this past Microsoft. Want another example of them screwing people over? Go buy an Xbox. If it doesn't die on you, you might have enough time to spend $50 a year on an online service that's barely better then PSN or Steam and then have to look at advertisements anyway. Don't get me wrong, I have a 360 and I enjoy using it (for the most part) but they do some really dirty business sometimes.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kenny goo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is there going to be a Starter, Home Basic, Home Premium, Professional, Ultimate, Business, and Enterprise too?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jaylittles531]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Jaylittles531 I'll take it as long as it's nothing like Millennium Edition! :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pookiewood]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you like multiple versions of things, you can get an iPad 16, iPad 16+3g,  iPad 32, iPad 32+3g,  iPad 64, iPad 64+3g.<br><br>However it is only funny when it's Microsoft producing different products for different niches.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Decoy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 4:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Decoy <br><br>I'm pretty sure all those different versions offer the exact same software features as each other.<br>All the different versions of Windows have distinct software differences. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[where u at?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 4:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Decoy  <br><br>Its funny when Microsoft does it because most of the editions server no purpose. I'm not by no means supporting the iPad and probably never will support it but at least all of those versions are different in big ways and have the same OS and can do everything exactly the same.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jaylittles531]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 5:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Decoy  <br>The difference is between hardware and software.<br>It costs more to make a single iPad + 3G than it does to make a single iPad without 3G. Apple has to pay for the extra components.<br><br>Microsoft develops one version of Windows and then strips it of features to create the different editions. That process in itself has to cost money. In effect they are spending extra money to provide an inferior product. Crazyness.<br><br>When it comes to Windows Mobile, it's a bit different. WinMo 6.5 isn't so much an edition of WinMo 7 as it is an almost completely different operating system. Not sure why they wanted to call it "starter edition" in the first place... oh well...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Theli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 8:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[So, let me get this straight: Windows Mobile Starter and Windows Mobile 7, both marketed as "new" OSes, will both have completely different APIs...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Confirmed: Windows Mobile 6.5 to become Windows Phone Starter Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/26/confirmed-windows-mobile-6-5-to-become-windows-phone-starter-ed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because multiples of every Windows OS, makes total sense. Give me a break.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[leanbarton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2010 3:55PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
