<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Freescale's new i.MX508 processor could mean cheaper, faster e-readers</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Freescale's new i.MX508 processor could mean cheaper, faster e-readers</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Freescale's new i.MX508 processor could mean cheaper, faster e-readers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't see any point in having a faster processor, if the E-ink refresh rate isn't improved.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 1st 2010 9:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Freescale's new i.MX508 processor could mean cheaper, faster e-readers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[@johnnyLong better (and cheaper) processors open up the e-reader devices to multifunction devices.  although i admit that i don't see the point of that either.<br><br>what they need to do is work on hybrid display technology like the screen Pixel Qi is working on.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[willow_twf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 1st 2010 9:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Freescale's new i.MX508 processor could mean cheaper, faster e-readers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[@johnnyLong The faster cpu will help with slow loading pdfs and some other books.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kabloink]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 1st 2010 10:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Freescale's new i.MX508 processor could mean cheaper, faster e-readers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd buy an e-reader for $150.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[superklye]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 1st 2010 9:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Freescale's new i.MX508 processor could mean cheaper, faster e-readers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[If they can use this and a color high refresh tech like the Mirasol display then we are talking a dramatic step up from the current batch of e-readers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[me_eit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 1st 2010 10:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Freescale's new i.MX508 processor could mean cheaper, faster e-readers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Tim Stevens - IMO it is more of a system-on-chip than just a processor.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[stoffer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 1st 2010 10:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Freescale's new i.MX508 processor could mean cheaper, faster e-readers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was under the impression that it was the e-ink screens that were stopping prices from going down, not the processor. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nitesh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 1st 2010 10:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Freescale's new i.MX508 processor could mean cheaper, faster e-readers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[Processor assembly, screen, and power system are the big costs for readers.  Drop the processor to a simpler system-on-a-chip type of unit, and you reduce costs, board real estate required, and inefficiencies caused by interconnects between discrete components.  Better efficiencies (and much lower prices for the processor) means you have more to work with for better screens and battery systems.<br><br>You probably COULD have a $150 reader, but you could have a much better (and more flexible) $200-$250 reader, with multi-function capabilities.  Either way, it's a potential win.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vrmithrax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 1st 2010 10:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Freescale's new i.MX508 processor could mean cheaper, faster e-readers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[Didn't Marvel announce a similar thing several months ago?<br>So where are all these cheap readers?<br>All I see from the interesting stuff are things like "we have more partners" and "... something will come out sometime".<br>Then another 10 companies launch poor knock-off 6" e-readers for $300 to $400...<br>Why is the future not here now already?<br>Come on!<br>Are we there yet!?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 1st 2010 11:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Freescale's new i.MX508 processor could mean cheaper, faster e-readers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[@savagemike - the product design/development/testing/refinement process is lengthy and involved.  Don't ever expect to see a new technology that has just been announced to actually hit the market for quite a while.  Typically, things are either announced when there is a breakthrough for a potential product, or a product has been developed and is just starting to be trickled out to interested developers.  Once the Shiny Great New Product (tm) gets into the hands of actual product development companies, only then can the true process of designing a product based on the new tech begin.<br><br>And, even after the process is done and the product hits the shelves, don't expect the price to be low until production is ramped up sufficiently to afford bulk savings.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vrmithrax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 1st 2010 12:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Freescale's new i.MX508 processor could mean cheaper, faster e-readers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[until it means a nice color screen i am not interested ... e-ink is too slow so who cares if it has a faster CPU?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[darthgault]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 1st 2010 12:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Freescale's new i.MX508 processor could mean cheaper, faster e-readers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/freescales-new-i-mx508-processor-could-mean-cheaper-faster-e-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[@darthgault - check the Liquavista demo running on Freescale CPU: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T55Y4mvPtLc" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T55Y4mvPtLc</a>. This is not yet with color, but Liquavista has a very promising technology for color displays.<br><br>A faster CPU is mandatory for color indeed. If it takes 6s to open a pdf page that's a no brainer!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Francks]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 2nd 2010 9:33AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
