<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Dell slips out OptiPlex 980 desktop, FX100 Zero Client</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Dell slips out OptiPlex 980 desktop, FX100 Zero Client</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Dell slips out OptiPlex 980 desktop, FX100 Zero Client]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</guid><description><![CDATA[More like F-Zero X100 client.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Leindurstit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2010 3:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Dell slips out OptiPlex 980 desktop, FX100 Zero Client]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Leindurstit whats so great about it? i dont recal reading anything.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[emopoops]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2010 3:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Dell slips out OptiPlex 980 desktop, FX100 Zero Client]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</guid><description><![CDATA[would not buy. :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2010 3:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Dell slips out OptiPlex 980 desktop, FX100 Zero Client]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</guid><description><![CDATA[@br0adcast <br><br>For the most part Optiplex is used in the business.  I know I've seen them at Comcast, H&R Block and even at my job we use various models of Optiplex.  They're pretty reliable PC's for the most part and whenever the time comes that a part goes down you can easily swap it out on the fly.<br><br>I guess I'll be looking forward to one of these in about a year when we upgrade our systems...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Platinum_Skeet]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2010 5:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Dell slips out OptiPlex 980 desktop, FX100 Zero Client]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</guid><description><![CDATA[@PlatinumSkeet Yep. I've got a GX270 and that thing's still upgradable to today. Sure, it might not be an i7 but instead a 2.8 GHz single-core Pentium 4, and sure it might not be 16 GB of DDR3 but instead 4 GB of DDR2, and sure it's AGP, but it's still reliable.<br><br>It's my current virtual machine server - runs great even without VT.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dragonfli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2010 8:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Dell slips out OptiPlex 980 desktop, FX100 Zero Client]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</guid><description><![CDATA[So the OptiPlex 980 starts at $807? What about the FX100 Zero? Frankly who cares about the OptiPlex?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2010 3:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Dell slips out OptiPlex 980 desktop, FX100 Zero Client]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jfine <br>I do. They are friggin stylish :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ark_v2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2010 4:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Dell slips out OptiPlex 980 desktop, FX100 Zero Client]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Arkv2  Touché. ;-) In that case show us pics Engadget!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2010 4:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Dell slips out OptiPlex 980 desktop, FX100 Zero Client]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</guid><description><![CDATA[For people that do not have the inclination to use imacs (I'm looking at my bosses!), this can be a good deal. They have enough horsepower to do whatever and the footprint is not too big. Not bad in my book. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jr2k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2010 3:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Dell slips out OptiPlex 980 desktop, FX100 Zero Client]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</guid><description><![CDATA[My company relies on desktop computers in the OptiPlex series for most employees.  In my department, most employees are issued laptops (like the Latitude D/E series, with some ThinkPads sprinkled around), but everyone else uses an OptiPlex.<br><br>If you're wondering who cares about these announcements, it's volume IT buyers.  And, indirectly, the people at the large companies that get assigned these machines.<br><br>I'm surprised at the $807 price -- I would have assumed that these machines were much cheaper.  Perhaps they are, on a volume basis; maybe $807 is the price that an individual would pay, in order to have the same computer at home that they use at work.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Saif]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2010 4:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Dell slips out OptiPlex 980 desktop, FX100 Zero Client]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</guid><description><![CDATA[@saifrc <br>I'd say this is pretty common when a new line first comes out.  In a few months these guys will start at $590 - $790.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2010 4:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Dell slips out OptiPlex 980 desktop, FX100 Zero Client]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</guid><description><![CDATA[I like the business'ey look although...starting at almost 1000 dollars i can really use a workstation instead of my thinkpad for CAD and stuff...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[questionexclamation]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2010 5:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Dell slips out OptiPlex 980 desktop, FX100 Zero Client]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</guid><description><![CDATA[C'mon Dell.. slip out the E6410/E6510/M4500 already]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2010 5:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Dell slips out OptiPlex 980 desktop, FX100 Zero Client]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</guid><description><![CDATA[A fully virtualized desktop environment could be really, really neat. Imagine logging off in one place, logging on in another, and having the same VMWare image? Also, the desktops would be insanely fast due to resource pooling.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2010 9:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Dell slips out OptiPlex 980 desktop, FX100 Zero Client]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/dell-slips-out-optiplex-980-desktop-fx100-zero-client/</guid><description><![CDATA[We've been testing out one of the FX100 boxes.  It is a rebranded DevonIT box.  Basically, a VMware view client without an operating system.<br><br>So, you take this box and plug two monitors, keyboard, mouse, network cable, speakers, USB devices into it and it connects all of that to your virtual PC running on a beast of a server back in the data center.<br><br>That box is specifically for virtual environments, and it does what it does very well.  PCoIP is worlds better than anything RDP-based, and once a few kinks get worked out it will be king of the virtual client marketplace.<br><br>And, one of the previous posters is right - having a fully virtualized desktop environment is incredible, not only for what it gives the users, but just that the technology exists at all.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2010 2:26PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
