<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[How about giving customers a small discount for opting in for online only billing?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pika2000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 5:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[@pika2000 <br><br>Please don't say anything about online only billing. They'll start charging a "'convenience' fee" instead.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JoePalma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 5:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[@pika2000 <br><br>Exactly, the saving eventually won't apply to "we the people". Good for saving trees and make company even more money and nothing else. I hope they use those money they save to hire more customer support and  not just pocketed themselves.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PhotoFre@k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 6:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[@pika2000 - YES, YES, YES!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MRCUR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 7:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[@pika2000 what about fixing the damn network instead of green marketing propaganda?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[abdelhadiakharas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 8:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[sager?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[4nth0ny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 6:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[Shame they don't save their customers some paper, the green kind.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scouse Pricey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 6:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[AT&T Wireless might be on the green wagon, but how can the rest of the company be environmentally friendly when they have a bunch of E-Waste in the name of U-Verse set top boxes?  <br><br>Those things are complete trash.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[miko34]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 7:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[Palm's packaging went eco with the Treo Pro. No manual or CD. You download it instead. Rubber bands instead of tie-wires No plastic baggies to separate things. Instead there is this clever corrugated cardboard snaking it's way through the box. There is some plastic to hold the device, but that'sit. It looks pretty cool, actually.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Colonel Kernel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 7:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ColonelKernel <br>An applicable question: does having instructions, etc. on the internet only, instead of in printed form, actually mean less waste?  In order to read the manual, a person has to have their computer and monitor running, connected to the internet and a powered server farm, and spend that time reading what they need to find scrolling through a PDF.  That all uses energy.  As long as that device is being supported, say for around five years, that infrastructure needs to remain in place.<br><br>Printing a small manual is a one time cost of energy and resources instead of a renewing resource, and potentially saves user time because they can flip straight through the manual quickly and find what they need, no lengthy scrolling or guessing applicable keywords.<br><br>I am not sure which is more eco-friendly ... I fear it may not be as clear cut as we would hope.  From a user perspective, I'd rather have the small paper manual to help get over the learning curve, even if it directs me to a webpage to solve an obscure problem I'm unique enough to have; but that's just my personal preference. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Sonne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 9:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[@James Sonne  If a product is well-designed and also has on-device help, most people should be happy with some sort of quick-start guide.<br>I guess, including manuals only starts becoming really wasteful when the manufacturer includes manuals in multiple languages (here in Europe you'll often find as many as ten manuals with devices).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lashoutdancingwhenyouregone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 4:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[*note that Apple does not specifically fall under these new packing requirements. Steve Jobs owns us. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MRCUR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 7:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MRCUR <br><br>Job patent the word "Steve"... Opps I've said it, he gonna sue the pants off of me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PhotoFre@k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 7:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[Does this mean they're going to quit sending me a fat envelope trying to sell me home phone service every 3 weeks?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Graham]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 9:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[at&t could be setting up baby hospitals and people would still bitch about them]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 9:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[Let's not pretend that good environmental practices matter to consumers.<br><br>During the years of Apple's meteoric rise they were rated the worst environmental offender in the CE industry, every time, and it didn't affect their sales or their image at all.<br><br>The few who actually heard about this, and wanted to like Apple anyway, just bought into Apple's "shoot the messenger" campaign (the messenger was Greenpeace).<br><br>So, perhaps some opportunistic announcements about green products produces free publicity, but good environmental policy will just cost a company money and doesn't help at all.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trufagus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 9:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree with tm115. Look green is good, I get it  and not everyone really cares I get that too. Complaining about every thing a company does just seems foolish to me. Look, here's a reality check for you. Google the name of any of the phone companies and type the word complaint after it. Every company including the big V returns over a million hits. At least my iPhone works is what I say and I am thankful for that. Green is good. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tanzier]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 9:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice one. Now time to move into the BIG BUCKS (AND ECHO FRIENDLY) SAVING$$$$. Time to put vertical axis wind turbines on those thousands of cell sites.<br><a href="http://www.helixwind.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.helixwind.com/</a><br><br>Can you imagine the hundreds of Millions of dollars in saving with nominal up front investment? Matter of fact these cell site add-ons will probably produce more energy than the cell site needs to operate. The extra power could be fed back into the grid or help supplement power for communities. Oh, and if you were nice you could lower our bills since a substantial operating cost (powering cell sites) would be darn near "0"!! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frankenstein Black]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 10:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[They should also trim down the packaging inside the devices, as in stop bloating the phones with crappy trialware we don't want!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RCC2k8]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 11:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[How about moving toward better service. Who gives a crap about the packaging when the device that is packaged barely works?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Pips]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 11:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ummm... <br><br>RING RING <br><br>Hello is this AT&T? It is? Great... I just wanted to let you know that Sprint has already started doing this and decided to take it one step further by requiring all new phones also be made of a more green technology, cut their waste products and off-set their energy usage by implementing solar panels at their HQ. . So...ummmm... Dont be upset when no one cares. Talk to you soon bye now.<br><br>CLICK]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger Alford]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 11:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Roger A <br><br>And if people cared about what their phones were made of or packaged in it may mean something for Sprint, but their dwindling subscriber base is proof people care more about service than eco crap.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Pips]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 12:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Mr Pips  <br><br>And if people cared about actual service, then they would select Sprint or Verizon over AT&T - the difference between "service" at Sprint and AT&T is that while Im on Sprint I have service. I cant say the same for my friends on AT&T.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger Alford]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 1:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't get it...so AT&T is going green...from charging all of their loyal customers stupid charges for our phone services. I just got my mom a LG xenon and they're charging me for a freaking texting plan that she doesn't need because AT&T doesn't have a decent phone that doesn't require a plan. Stupid...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jose]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 12:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T moves toward eco-friendly packaging, earns our approbation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/atandt-moves-toward-eco-friendly-packaging-earns-our-approbation/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, cuz lack of eco-friendly packaging is where my beef lies with AT&T, not their crap service. While 200 tons may sound like a lot, in the grand scheme of things, it's a drop in the bucket. While every little bit helps, they don't deserve any press for this mostly empty gesture. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 2:10PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
