<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Nokia C5 wastes no time getting FCC blessing</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/06/nokia-c5-wastes-no-time-getting-fcc-blessing/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Nokia C5 wastes no time getting FCC blessing</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nokia C5 wastes no time getting FCC blessing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/06/nokia-c5-wastes-no-time-getting-fcc-blessing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/06/nokia-c5-wastes-no-time-getting-fcc-blessing/</guid><description><![CDATA[FCC employees need to wash their hands more often.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vux]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 6th 2010 3:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nokia C5 wastes no time getting FCC blessing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/06/nokia-c5-wastes-no-time-getting-fcc-blessing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/06/nokia-c5-wastes-no-time-getting-fcc-blessing/</guid><description><![CDATA[To plain!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mp3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 6th 2010 7:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nokia C5 wastes no time getting FCC blessing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/06/nokia-c5-wastes-no-time-getting-fcc-blessing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/06/nokia-c5-wastes-no-time-getting-fcc-blessing/</guid><description><![CDATA[I completely love how there are 3.2MP cameras on mid-range/ low end phones. I remember the days when 1MP camera were top of the line. And the back of the phone immediately reminded me of the 3650 perhaps because of the colors and lines. Ahh, nostalgia.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[derX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 6th 2010 9:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nokia C5 wastes no time getting FCC blessing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/06/nokia-c5-wastes-no-time-getting-fcc-blessing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/06/nokia-c5-wastes-no-time-getting-fcc-blessing/</guid><description><![CDATA[@derX <br>most of the top phones today are 3.2 to 5 mp. This is average for Nokia. How much you wanna bet this takes better pics than a G1 or iPhone?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[christexaport]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2010 8:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nokia C5 wastes no time getting FCC blessing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/06/nokia-c5-wastes-no-time-getting-fcc-blessing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/06/nokia-c5-wastes-no-time-getting-fcc-blessing/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm a little intrested in this phone, however, the battery cover looks a little awkward & Im willing to bet my Nokia 3710 flip that this phone will never make it back to the states...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wil2Win]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2010 3:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nokia C5 wastes no time getting FCC blessing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/06/nokia-c5-wastes-no-time-getting-fcc-blessing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/06/nokia-c5-wastes-no-time-getting-fcc-blessing/</guid><description><![CDATA[well, if the FCC approved it, some carrier must have shown interest. Maybe a PAYG service. TMobile or at&t could make alot from this device. Instead of a dumbphone, this could get folks using the web and services.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[christexaport]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2010 8:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nokia C5 wastes no time getting FCC blessing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/06/nokia-c5-wastes-no-time-getting-fcc-blessing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/06/nokia-c5-wastes-no-time-getting-fcc-blessing/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nokia makes the best low-end phones in the market.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[samjE]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2010 2:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nokia C5 wastes no time getting FCC blessing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/06/nokia-c5-wastes-no-time-getting-fcc-blessing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/06/nokia-c5-wastes-no-time-getting-fcc-blessing/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can't help but notice vague similarities between this and the 6120c of 2007 vintage. Allow me to geek out a bit here:<br>Both are 3G candybars running S60 3rd edition, both have numeric keypads, both have 2"-ish screens at 240x320, both have dual cameras with front-facing VGA for video calls. The only real differences are in terms of processor (369 MHz ARM11 v. 600 MHz ARM11), actual screen size (2.0" v. 2.2"), stereo jacks (2.5mm v. 3.5mm), and main camera resolution (2.0 megapixels v. 3.15 megapixels). Oh, and the inclusion of A-GPS. Either way, though, this is clearly a spiritual successor to the 6120c, a phone that served me well for many months... until I lost it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Special_K]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2010 6:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nokia C5 wastes no time getting FCC blessing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/06/nokia-c5-wastes-no-time-getting-fcc-blessing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/06/nokia-c5-wastes-no-time-getting-fcc-blessing/</guid><description><![CDATA[@RingmasterJ <br>no. it doesnt have a front facing camera and no it isnt running s60.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900androidOS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2010 12:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nokia C5 wastes no time getting FCC blessing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/06/nokia-c5-wastes-no-time-getting-fcc-blessing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/06/nokia-c5-wastes-no-time-getting-fcc-blessing/</guid><description><![CDATA[@N900androidOS  <br><br>It does run S60. That's why it's any news at all, given its price point. No front-facing camera, though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[inept]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2010 3:33PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
