<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[Exaflops?  What were they called when they went out?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2010 8:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Unverified User I was gonna ask the same thing ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Quick6]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2010 8:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) <br><br>Is that oscilloscope in the background running Mac OS X? O.o]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Blackstar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2010 11:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Blackstar  No, it's Agilent Infiniium series Oscilloscope and it runs Windows. The X's that it shows are eye diagram crossings.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[stoffer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2010 5:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@stoffer  <br><br>What's that you say?  You have no sense of humor?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Blackstar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2010 10:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[It seems pretty slow, I can see the light and even the 1's and 0's.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[reallynotnick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2010 8:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[*looks at co worker with a cheesy grin* :]]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2010 8:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[So now I know what happened to TC Chen after he lost the '85 US Open after  he tied the low 3 round total.... Poor guy is only now known for his double hit on the fifth hole.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ATSA  Amish Tech Society of Amer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2010 9:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dejavu anyone????<br>I swear I saw this video and read a similar article not less than a week ago here on Engadget?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[abedinthehouse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2010 9:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[Shit, accidentally pressed submit, Damn comment system!!!!<br><br>....anyway, this tech is still really cool, and prolly is used right can blow SATA port speeds out of the park if they just find a way to increase the range even to a few inches.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[abedinthehouse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2010 9:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@abedinthehouse <br>Except that higher SATA speeds aren't going to do jack to speed up hard drive transfers. This is only for on-board interconnections that are just a few millimeters apart (chip to chip). There are already fiber technologies for external connections like TOSLINK (Fiber optic audio cable). This would probably be best used in area on a motherboard or other circuitry where chip to chip communication needs to be as fast as possible. An example being the communication between a processor and RAM modules. That connection would benefit greatly from this tech.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TRB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2010 3:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow that picture is goldmine for IBM HR. A white ,african american and an asian guy working on the same thing. If those are actual guys, I would play the racial harmony part (but in a subtle way).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Arnie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2010 9:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@arnavdesai <br>how do you know that guy is african american he could be french guyana, british, etc...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xconan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2010 9:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@xconan  *rolls eyes*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kirbyatemytoothbrush]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2010 12:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[When can I get my 100 TB microSD card in my Phone that will be processed by an Exaflop Processor driven by Windows Phone 8 OS so that it can hang and I have to reset it and lose my Terbit 5G connection while I was playing a multi-player Halo 6...<br><br>$#!^, I just got fragged at 400 Gbs...<br><br>=D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TekWarrior]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2010 9:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[this isn't new. its like fiber optics. using light instead of copper and electricity]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[1andrew19944]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2010 9:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sorry, IBM, but this is way too P.C. to be real.<br><br>Admit it: this is two engineers chatting with the building janitor..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[woowoowoo22]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2010 10:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@woowoowoo22 <br><br>It's probably an EE, CpE, and CS guy all arguing who is better.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[paul34]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2010 10:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@woowoowoo22 Ironically, the black dude is their boss.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jalexoid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2010 3:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[Imagine the overclocking abilities since it uses less power.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[scody008]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2010 10:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@scody008 <br>Unfortunately, you still can't overclock it faster than light...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Harvey Chan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2010 10:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ch4ch4  <br>wider spectrum? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[usernr1337]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2010 12:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@NIMBUS  Hell you can! Replace white with ultraviolet and even Crysis will fly around at 15562112141008150028460469 FPS! Your fucking monitor will melt, man!!!!11111one]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loocas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2010 6:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@loocas  I think your eyes would melt first.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2010 6:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v464/n7285/full/nature08813.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v464/n7285/full/nature08813.html</a><br><br>for those with uni access...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hyperion2020]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2010 11:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[Might I point out that IBM was the one that put the red mouse nipple on the Thinkpads in the first place?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John P]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2010 12:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is this similar to the way Intel's LightPeak works?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[scottsdale]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2010 1:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[I didn't understand a single word of that video, but damn this is cool!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cossor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2010 1:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[Tiger Woods have put himself together.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sarcasme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2010 3:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM keeps light pulse bandwagon rolling, uses 'em for chip-to-chip communication]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/ibm-keep-light-pulse-bandwagon-rolling-uses-em-for-chip-to-chi/</guid><description><![CDATA[Combine this with the recent (last couple of years?) discovery in Australia that in an experiment a pulse apparently passed the destination gate before the pulse even passed the source gate (effectively going back in time) and you have some fairly massive computing power. Imagine breaking 1024-bit encryption BEFORE you even clicked on the mouse.  ... but will it run Crysis?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Langdon Alger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2010 11:30AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
