http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/ Engadget Comments for Time Warner Cable offering its tubes to AT&T, Verizon http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/Mar 8th 2010 2:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/
There's rumors out that TWC's trying to start up some cellphone service so you never know it could work out for both parties involved...]]>Mar 8th 2010 2:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/TWC is already in wireless business. I'm getting offers from them to subscribe for WiMax service in Charlotte area. ]]>Mar 8th 2010 2:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/Actually TWC is just a name behind the WiMax service they don't even troubleshoot or provide the cards it is all on Sprint's towers]]>Mar 8th 2010 2:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/Mar 8th 2010 3:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/Mar 8th 2010 2:07PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/
thx

Seriously though, glad to hear AT&T is getting the act straight.

Verizon, you just keep getting better and better..wish you had better phones though. :x I know DROID does, but my wallet doesn't]]>Mar 8th 2010 2:07PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/Mar 8th 2010 2:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/Mar 8th 2010 2:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/TWC has already released docsis 3.0 in several areas, the lower package is 35 down and 5 up and the higher is 50 down and 15 up. The future max for docsis 3 will be over 300 megs down and 150 up]]>Mar 8th 2010 2:37PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/
I know they have been doing this same thing in Texas with Verizon. My buddy works in Verizon's NOC.]]>Mar 8th 2010 2:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/Mar 8th 2010 2:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/Mar 8th 2010 2:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/Like I've said, we are all going to be limited on internet usage. There's no point in making it more bandwith hungry if companies like concast are being assholes by capping. Not to direct people into other services, but verizon is the only one I know that doesn't hold a cap]]>Mar 8th 2010 2:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/Time Warner Cable in NYC doesnt cap. dont care what you show me or tell me, my monthly bill is all the proof I need to know they dont cap :)]]>Mar 8th 2010 2:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/Mar 8th 2010 2:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/
Huh? All cell carriers utilize various companies for internet backhauling. VZ landline, AT&T, Sprint, Qwest, TWC, Cablevision, etc. etc. There are several reasons this occurs: A certain provider is established in an area, can be cheaper to use another provider than pay to run your own infrastructure, FCC rules, etc.

With regards to the femtocells. It is not always feasible to place a tower to plug up every single weak spot. There can be terrain considerations, for example yes, that foliage between you and a tower's LOS can act like zillions of little reflector dishes, or yes, the fact the tower is on the other side of a hill from you can degrade a signal. There are also licenses, local and regional ordinances, obtaining the land or lease space, not to mention the paradoxical NIMBY syndrome from the very people complaining "why can't the cell company just put up more towers?"]]>Mar 9th 2010 10:05AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/Mar 8th 2010 2:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/
I know, right? The picture freezes and you have to change the channel or turn off the system or reboot the system. I wonder if it's a software glitch with their DVR OS. I hate that limited POS OS. Why set a reminder, why can't it automatically change to a variety of channels as I program them? I lose DVR functionality periodically. I don't understand why it can't be setup so that if the TV is playing a show, the DVR has to be functional.

This is some irony. I just let ATT after 5 years, for Sprint.]]>Mar 8th 2010 11:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/Mar 8th 2010 2:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/so... you trolled yourself?]]>Mar 8th 2010 3:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/Mar 8th 2010 4:03PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/Mar 8th 2010 4:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/Mar 8th 2010 5:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/Wake me up when they lend AT&T more bandwidth for U-Verse!]]>Mar 8th 2010 5:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/Mar 8th 2010 6:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/Mar 8th 2010 9:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/time-warner-cable-offering-its-tubes-to-atandt-verizon/Mar 9th 2010 7:20AM