<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Samsung prices TL500, TL350, AQ100 and SL605 shooters</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Samsung prices TL500, TL350, AQ100 and SL605 shooters</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung prices TL500, TL350, AQ100 and SL605 shooters]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh god, I'm gunna blow all my money, these look too great to resist.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yule&bellow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2010 11:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung prices TL500, TL350, AQ100 and SL605 shooters]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</guid><description><![CDATA[@yulebellow <br>+1. This is without doubt the best looking non-SLR camera I have ever seen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fordy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2010 12:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung prices TL500, TL350, AQ100 and SL605 shooters]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</guid><description><![CDATA[The TL-350 will look great in my pocket.  It's gonna be a fun spring!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[edu3000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2010 11:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung prices TL500, TL350, AQ100 and SL605 shooters]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Edobe There are so many things wrong with that statement.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jblock]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2010 1:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung prices TL500, TL350, AQ100 and SL605 shooters]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</guid><description><![CDATA[That is one slick looking camera.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[trainwrecka]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2010 11:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung prices TL500, TL350, AQ100 and SL605 shooters]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</guid><description><![CDATA[Put that shooter away.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Leindurstit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2010 11:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung prices TL500, TL350, AQ100 and SL605 shooters]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</guid><description><![CDATA[F 1.8 for a digicam is amazing. I wonder how it looks at that aperature? Even if you have to stop it down to 2.2, that's still pretty nice.<br><br>What's the sensor size on these bad boys?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chispito]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2010 11:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung prices TL500, TL350, AQ100 and SL605 shooters]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</guid><description><![CDATA[@chispito 1/1.7" sensor]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jarek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2010 11:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung prices TL500, TL350, AQ100 and SL605 shooters]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</guid><description><![CDATA[@chispito <br><br>I was thinking the same thing.  I have a 85mm f 1.8 prime lens for my DSLR, but my previous digicam only had a f 3.5 lens and it sucked at lower light pictures.<br><br>I would like to see this have a 10x or 12x zoom on it however.  It might not be able to fit in a pocket or have the f 1.8 at that point however.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rcappo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2010 12:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung prices TL500, TL350, AQ100 and SL605 shooters]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</guid><description><![CDATA[@chispito S90 has an f/2.0 lens, looks great at that setting.<br><br>I'm not sure even the f/1.8 is the big news on this one - what impresses me is that it looks like it's f/2.4 at 3x zoom, which is pretty impressive. The S90 drops quite fast to f/4.9 at 3x zoom, so that's a pretty big advantage for the TL500.<br><br>From the picture it looks like they nicked the idea of a control ring around the lens from the S90 too, which is a great move. It's such an incredibly useful tool, makes the S90 actually *easier* to control manually than most DSLRs.<br><br>I love my S90, but if I hadn't bought it, it'd be pretty hard to ignore this thing. Need final reviews to see if it's as good as the specs, but the specs are very impressive...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Williamson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2010 2:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung prices TL500, TL350, AQ100 and SL605 shooters]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Atkins <br><br>never .......... <br><br>samsung products have the worst build quality..........<br><br>except their last year LED TV's (some gud) ......... <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[XRX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2010 11:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung prices TL500, TL350, AQ100 and SL605 shooters]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</guid><description><![CDATA[The specs on the TL500 are very nice, and would make me seriously consider replacing my Lumix LX3.  However, why does it have to look so ugly?  Something about that design just doesn't mesh for me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[photoguy622]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2010 11:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung prices TL500, TL350, AQ100 and SL605 shooters]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</guid><description><![CDATA[They put the flash on left side again on the tl350 just like the wb500/550. It suck coz fingers keep blocking the flash when shooting with 1 hand.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Raffstyle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2010 12:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung prices TL500, TL350, AQ100 and SL605 shooters]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's one good-looking camera. Love the "old style" details and overall feeling.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shishi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2010 12:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung prices TL500, TL350, AQ100 and SL605 shooters]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah! Let the aperture wars begin!<br><br>I just bought a Canon S90 and that F2.0 lens has made far more of an impact on the quality of my photography than any jump in megapixels ever did. I can shoot on the street at night with no flash and ISO 200, handheld. I can also get the shallow depth of field that has always been impossible with pocket cameras.<br><br>The F1.8 lens on this bad boy lets in twice as much light as the lens on my S90. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BdgBill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2010 3:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung prices TL500, TL350, AQ100 and SL605 shooters]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</guid><description><![CDATA[@BdgBill1 <br><br>50% more light, not twice. a 1.4 would be twice 2]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Irfan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2010 5:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung prices TL500, TL350, AQ100 and SL605 shooters]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</guid><description><![CDATA[@irfan  actually i think its 25%]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Irfan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2010 5:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung prices TL500, TL350, AQ100 and SL605 shooters]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/09/samsung-prices-tl500-tl350-aq100-and-sl605-shooters/</guid><description><![CDATA["expected in that same spring release window"<br>When do you suspect that is? Spring could be May!! Anyone know the release date?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2010 8:23PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
