<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, at least its improving...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[commenter7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 3:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@commenter7 Surely that's the only way it can go...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nickgc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 3:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@commenter7 i think the designers of this need to emprovise a bit more. I mean what a dust crack!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[emopoops]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 3:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dear Nokia,<br><br>Just get it working fine on a phone out of the box, instead of having users wait months and firmware updates down the road. Mmmmkay?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AJ in the East Bay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 3:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@aubreyq  <br>There arent that manny feuture-rich smartphones released today that doest need 1 or two fw updates before they works as they should.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[simon.anden.musik]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 3:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@aubreyq  Actually why people still keep buying Symbian phones form Nokia rather than Samsung than SE that superb hardware nowadays is the fact that Nokia got by far best support compared to the other large manufacturers. Samsung is totally lost with this one, SE isn't any better and Motorolas support seems to get only to USA while we in UK need to wait months to get buggy fw.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[top]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 4:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Pdexter  <br>Nokia support? If you mean their customer service, then yes, Nokia's customer service is good. Other than that, their handset support is utterly terrible.<br>For example, the N85 has a browser keypad bug. It's been well documented since v11 or so. Currently the firmware is v30 and the bug is still there. I can count 1 bug they've fixed with the N85 and that was the audio playing out the speakers when headphones were connected and you received a text. So in the 4-5 firmware updates since they released that phone; they've fixed one bug and added 2 "features" (flip phone to silence and something else small). Let's not forget their "free" OVI amps for Nokia... you know, it's free as long as you don't have a phone older than 6 months old even though the OS is the same revision (except for the N97, older than 6 months).<br><br>SE and Samsung at least fix their bugs. Nokia can't do that and can't add features even when possible (N95 is more than capable of S60v3 FP2 but they won't, N86 has the old homescreen even though it came out 1 month before the lower end S60v3 phones with the new homescreens).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[totalundone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 11:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@pachi72 <br>Its not really a complete apple knock-off, it looks more like the cover art browsing you may find on the sony X1000 or whatever its name was.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[simon.anden.musik]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 3:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[not good enough]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900androidOS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 3:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh boy, looks as crap as it did before and the demo animation is not even running on real mobile hardware. I bet it will be a lot slower when it's real and not a precalculated hollywood-os animation on laptop computer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jussipussi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 3:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wake me up when it's real os running on real mobile-phone hardware instead of being animation of an imaginary OS displayed on laptop computer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jussipussi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 3:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jussipussi Its not an animation. Remember when Engadget mocked Symbian being ported to x86? Well this is the result. The "phone" is running on a laptop hardware as opposed to ARM. You can see in the vid that whats shown on the tv is being manipulated by the input of the guy behind the laptop.<br><br>Its true that the proof is in the pudding and that the ux could be dramatically different when ported onto ARM but lets not forget thats where its being optimized and with the decade worth of experience Nokia has with TI & ARM chips, they should not eff it up!<br><br>Ppl seem to forget that this update was supposed to iron out the bugs and lay the groundwork for future releases (single/double click etc). It was never meant to add "flash" & majority of Symbian users worldwide would appreciate that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Red_Munk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 4:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Munk  You're probably wrong - the x86 baseport was very experimental. This is probably a simulator, making use of the PCs graphics chip to do the HW graphics acceleration so essential to Symbian^3. You can tell it's real because of the way the lists render, and some slight jumps in the UI (nothing to worry about, but it gives away that this ain't flash). Also, why would that dude be sitting in front of the screen moving a mouse around if this was an animation??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bdonegan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 7:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Munk On the contrary, how could they not eff it up? Nokia has had too many problems with hardware and software for me to trust them anymore. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[swhite237]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 7:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jussipussi "Animation" : OMG, you are truly an entertainer.<br>Please, enlighten us more with your superb intelligence :D<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr w00t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 12:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Munk  <br><br>This is actually running in an emulated environment, which I'm sure will be delivered along with the Symbian^3 SDK. Standard Nokia practice.<br><br>@brendand<br><br>There would be no GPU hardware acceleration here or anything like that, unless this acceleration is included as part of the platform. The PC's resources are used to create the emulated environment, nothing more. You can expect this level of performance on actual hardware.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[inept]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 2:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[this looks good! i love widgets, the more the better. the whole UI looks good now, they just need to make sure the whole connectivity flows! i have noticed toooo many pop ups asking where i want to connect!! they need this covered, the phone needs to know that if there is wi-fi don't ask just connect and if there isn't then just connect with my carrier!!! how hard is that nokia?? this needs to be controllable by a master setting not by each individual app! right now their UI is just inconsistent on multiple levels and most people are right its annoying to use. Overall though you can do more with a Nokia than with any other phone out there, they just need consistency and simplicity worked into their UI. Don't make the user think too much, make it simple. Once set don't ask too much, just do it!!! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dean]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 3:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@lav1daloca Thats exactly what they have done. Unified access points. Persistent kinetic scrolling. Single clicks in the entire OS. Lesser menus. Added QT4.6 (Python, C, Java, els) etc etc.<br><br>There are a hundreds of improvements under the hood that change the UX  rather than the UI and that is by design. Anyone familiar with Symbian would not feel overwhelmed by the change nor frustrated by the usability. <br><br>Function>Form!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Red_Munk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 4:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@lav1daloca <br><br>hmm, i like complexity and choices. I must a geek or something..<br><br>I hope they dont dumb it down too much after all the noise coming out of the US of A.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dansus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 6:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@lav1daloca <br>Personaly, I like when the OS asks me where to connect.<br>There are not any unlimited data plans in my country so I don't want to be connected to 3G automaticaly.<br>1MB of 3G data is aprox. 1$. Now imagine 1MB every hour for one month...<br>Or imagine automatic 3g connection and downloads in roaming. It would destroy me financialy.<br>Ps: sorry for my bad english]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mickey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 6:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@lav1daloca Connectivity is being sorted in Symbian^3, thanks!<br><br><a href="http://developer.symbian.org/wiki/index.php/One_Click_Connectivity_%28OCC%29_-_A_guide_for_developers" rel="nofollow">http://developer.symbian.org/wiki/index.php/One_Click_Connectivity_%28OCC%29_-_A_guide_for_developers</a> (somewhat technical)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bdonegan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 7:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@lav1daloca  I completely agree.<br><br>Symbian/S60 offers lots of control and flexibility but it should not get in the way of the user if the user doesn't want to be bothered.<br><br>Reduce the number of clicks/choices the user needs to perform to accomplish something (e.g. one-click app exit).  Optimize screen real estate (autohide controls/menus for example, which I didn't see in this demo).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WickedEast]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 12:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@lav1daloca - I don't know if it's a new feature or not, but I recently switched from Nokia 5800 to a 5630 XpressMusic. (S60 5th edition to 3rd edition feature pack 2), and I love the way my 5630 handles connections.<br><br>As you mentioned, you can prioritize your connections so the phone never asks where to connect. (5800 didn't have such capability). I don't know if that's the case with newer 5th edition devices or not (like X6) but my 5630 which is running 3rd edition FP2 already has this feature, and it's quite useful.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fikhl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 4:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@fikhl  Eh? I can prioritize my connections on my 5800. Haven't seen a connection confirmation dialog for a while, and it automatically chooses between my home WLAN and 3G, depending on what's available. The only minor niggle: No global confirmation settings for J2ME apps, default is always "ask once" and I have to change it for every new J2ME application I install. But other than that, everything's smooth.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 4:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DaHauns - Really?! I didn't know that! Oh what a fool I've been, but if I'm not mistaken 5800 should at least switched to my home network automatically when I was in range, but it didn't! Every time I had to choose WLAN manually.<br><br>Mmm...but I don't miss 5800 that much, I really liked it when I first bought it, but the phone was so buggy even with the latest firmware. I'm eagerly looking forward to Symbian ^3.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fikhl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 5:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm all for MeeGo currently when we are talking about Nokia's OS platforms. Symbian^4 will be enough and most probally Symbian^3 to keep Symbians position high, but Nokia's high end will be all about MeeGo.<br><br>Thought if we talk about monster feature smartphone a'la Nokia, SE and Samsung i would take Symbian^3 for now because it got better implementation of camera and such.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[top]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 4:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just give up, Nokia. You've become the Xerox of the cellphone industry. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lundmark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 4:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Lundmark <br><br>Yeah you only have the biggest marketshare of phones worldwide.... just give up already.<br><br>/sarcasm]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Forphucsake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 5:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think it looks good, especially for developers:<br><br>* Programs are written in Qt which is waaaay nicer and faster than Android's Java.<br>* The dig he took at Android's fake multitasking was a fair point - the task management in Android is pretty weird, unpredictable and unintuitive.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 5:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ooh, Nightwish concert!<br><br>Yeah that's about all that's interesting in this video. I know the capabilities of a smartphone are there but something about symbian just puts me to sleep... maybe it was two years on a nokia featurephone (which was a damn good phone), but there's just no shine to the interface, it's dead boring.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brantyr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 5:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Bratyr <br><br>I hope most of the people use their phones capabilities and not the user interface. If I want to entertain myself I play a game, read a book, call one of those phone sex lines. I can imagine fiddling with your phone alone gets boring rather quickly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nrde]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 6:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Nrde <br>It's just the look and feel WHILE you're doing things - I know a few people do turn it off but most people leave the aero interface on windows 7 or even the regular themed windows XP interface and don't turn it down to the blocky windows 98 version. It just feels uglier than it should.... maybe I'm just weird.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brantyr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 6:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good! Looks really responsive and fast. It looks like Symbian^4 is going to be pretty impressive (no more back and options buttons; no backward compatibility though).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Suomaa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 5:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Suomaa<br>I do hope that they make those pop-ups look a bit more modern. That will probably change since this is pre-release stuff.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Suomaa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 5:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Suomaa <br>that's a bit misleading. Most current app development is using Qt, and Symbian^4 promises complete Qt compatibility. So there will be compatibility, and there has been a two year head start to port and redesign apps for Qt. I see little to worry about.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[christexaport]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 10:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think the silence when he asked if anyone had questions says it all.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hvakrg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 6:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@hvakrg <br><br>People were all in awe.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WickedEast]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 12:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[I like this UI...looks very nice...and it is not the same as all the others have...i have an Android phone right now but that looks nice (i can not explain why but i like symbians GUI more then the one of Android or the iPhone)...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bluefisch200]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 6:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bluefisch200 <br><br>Exactly, theres little wrong with Symbian OS, it just needed a bit of polish and decent task manager. Which is exactly what we have here, can wait to pick one up asap.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dansus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 6:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dansus  <br>They've always had the best task management solutions. If you're using a Symbian device without the free and best JBak Taskman, you'll never get why people love Symbian so much. JBak should be built into the OS.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[christexaport]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 9:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bluefisch200 <br><br>I'm using Samsung's 3D task switcher on my i8910 and i love it. It's just too bad it's not a standard part of S60v5. the multitasking solution Nokia is showing for Symbian^3 looks almost the same.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[G]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 3:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[Some company is going to have to come up with an original OS.  Everyone can't keep copying Apple and except to beat Apple.  Apple owns the Trademark on Multitouch and they own most of the patents.  Symbian and Android infringe badly on Apple's patents.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark C]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 8:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@realmail<br>Sorry dude, but I'm pretty sure that that it's the other way round between Symbian and mobile OSX.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Suomaa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 9:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@realmail <br>To give a value lesson, you can make a smartphone without multitouch, but you can't make a smartphone without paying Nokia. Trivial patents do little to drive the industry, but Nokia's R&D provide the backbone of this industry.<br><br>On a sidenote, Apple owns A patent for multitouch, but so do others, like Stantum. Notice the presenter mentions multitouch via resistive screens. Let's see Apple control that. Its questionable if their multitouch patent is even enforceable.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[christexaport]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 10:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@realmail <br><br>Apple has patented whining about others stealing their patents. You should expect a call from Apple's lawyers soon.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[G]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 3:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[The decision to keep Symbian alive instead of fully adopting Maemo makes no sense to me. It's not like Symbian^3 looks anything like S60. As a matter of fact the UI looks a whole lot closer to the N900's.<br><br>Just let it die. Imagine if Microsoft had improved on WM instead of rewriting it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TareG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 8:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TareG <br><br>To me it makes a huge amount of sense. Remember that Nokia makes lot more than top of the line smartphones. While Maemo/MeeGo is great, you can't run the full linux stack properly on something priced 100$. <br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rev]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 10:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TareG <br>this IS S60, and nearly a dead ringer for the N97 homescreen. The new UI comes this winter. And feature wise, Symbian is more mature than Maemo, and able to power cheaper devices. MeeGo is for superphones and computers, not smartphones.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[christexaport]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 10:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[The OS is good and the improvements are in the right direction, but I don't like the icons. So I hope it'll be "skinable".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chabba]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 8:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/symbian-3-ui-demonstrated-in-more-detail-video/</guid><description><![CDATA[@chabba <br>Of course it is.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Suomaa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2010 9:34AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
