<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[really no comments?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheSunman89]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 10:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheSunman89 <br>Wow, someone is a little too impatient.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HickorySwitch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 10:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheSunman89 <br><br>Who's laptops? I did not know of this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacinth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 10:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheSunman89 <br><br>Hmm just need to coordinate a couple hundred people to gettyeir laptops and all starts shaking the outside Stanford to freak then out lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[boo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 11:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[@1800BelowMe  I smell a brilliant prank in the making!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[XenoTheSilly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 12:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheSunman89 yeah stil doesnt make sense]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[emopoops]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 3:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[Google Earth (Quake)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 11:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[no comments...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheSunman89]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 10:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheSunman89 <br><br>shut the fck up ass wipe.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian (PC gamer  extraordinaire)]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 10:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can see my house lights from here!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nitesh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 10:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is it too late when your laptop detect the earthquake?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mianmian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 10:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mianmian Not necessarily. Earthquakes travel fairly slow.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jarek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 10:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is actually pretty interesting. Earthquakes are a type of natural disaster that really can not be predicted, other than the known borders of tectonic plates. I'm not sure how well this will work, but it's a step in the right direction.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HotDog]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 10:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[@HotDog Now if they can get a version of the software running on every smart phone that has accelerometers. There would have to be some way to filter out 'normal' movement. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[XenoTheSilly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 1:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[HotDog?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HawtDawg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 2:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[It could take advantage of all the phones that have accelerometer too I guess....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loginatnine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 10:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[@loginatnine No doubt, where's the iPhone app?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonas P]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 10:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[@loginatnine <br><br>Most people use their phones on the go, it would be to bumpy to be accurate.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacinth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 10:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[@loginatnine <br>Maybe because everyone is always shaking their phone?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dashiva]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 10:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Jonas P  It doesn't work because the iPhone doesn't have multitasking.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PCIV]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 10:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jincongz Lol of course, note to self, think before submitting... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonas P]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 12:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jincongz  That's why it needs to be ported to smart phones. Not the iPhone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[XenoTheSilly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 1:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[Don't they have.. yanno.. seismographs and so forth for this?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 10:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[no earthquake for the quebec it looks great!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[huffy15]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 10:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[while it does detect earthquakes, is it particularly useful for a computer network to let us know as those computers are being shaken to the floor?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bolezhinkov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 11:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[as a seismic structural engineer i have to say that this isn't a PREDICTION tool, it is a WARNING tool...though it would be a pretty short warning.  Earthquakes travel at the speed of sound of the soil, so it is possible that for a large quake a 30 to 60 second warning (assuming you're relatively far from the epicenter) could give someone time to get under a table.  <br>It's also a pretty interesting research tool.  Typically accelerometer readings are only avialable by a few instruments which may already be in the area (Chile has about 20 or so, while haiti didn't have any, California has quite a few).  Being able to access the time histories from all of these devices post quake would make for a great way to quantify localized soil effects (assuming you had GPS info) which have a very significant impact on structure response.  Theoretically, you could use these localized readings to help develop better hazard maps and thereby improve the design codes.  The downside though is that I doubt it's easy to quantify the accuracy of the accelerometers in use (probably just have to count on averaging of many results to give a general level of accuracy) or the influence of the structure your in (i.e.: reading at ground level will be different from at several stories up).  <br><br>too bad my netbook doesn't have an accelerometer...dang!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[marc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 11:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[@NGnerd Time for someone with the skills to step up and design an SD card with accelerometer, storage space and this software. That way you would at least have a standardized accelerometer in place to distribute and anyone who wanted to participate could purchase one for there laptop even if there laptop didn't have an accelerometer. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[XenoTheSilly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 1:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[@NGnerd <br><br>I don't know, the theory behind this sounds a little shaky.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Twitchy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 4:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is really not that great.  I mean it sounds nice in theory and in practice but how is it useful?  It is certainly not a predictor of earthquakes, and won't work where there are no laptops and/or no internet, like a lot of poorer places in the world.  And in developed areas, there are certainly earthquake detection services available.<br><br>I would say, you might as well monitor tweeter and see if a ton of people in a certain location start tweeting, "omg, ground is shaking! brb."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[poached]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 11:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[@poached If this project proves reliable then it's not hard to imagine embedded appliances. For example, it could be a device similar to a smoke detector, where most homes (at least in earthquake prone areas). It could hook into a cellular data network, or connect wirelessly (or even wired) to your existing home network. If this could give 30 to 60 seconds of warning before the largest impact of the earthquake then that would give someone enough time to get to a safer place or position and could save thousands of lives if a big one hits. <br><br>If the embedded devices work out at a cheap price (maybe it will be under a government price reduction plan, like the digital tv converters) then I don't see why there wouldn't eventually be one in everyones home and is just as common as a smoke detector]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 11:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[@touchmygadget <br>WMD!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Hemler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 11:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[What happens if everyone is copulating on the same time?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 11:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[Okay, so I installed the thing.  Have a thinkpad, thought I would contribute.  I have just uninstalled it.<br><br>First, it doesn't have a monitoring module.  You have to run EVERYTHING, including the graphical interface that watches all the other computers and everything.  You can't just leave the sensor watcher running in the background.  That alone killed it for me.<br><br>On top of that though, the internet stopped working (Windows 7 32-bit, Firefox, a recent install actually so fairly clean) after I stopped running it and didn't work again until after a removal/reboot.  Ugh.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fanfoot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 11:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[Umm... when your device senses vibration, it's not called "predicting an earthquake," it's called "detecting an earthquake." And USGS already has many million dollar worth sensing devices in different locations... why would I need to get my info from some layman devices? And... earthquake is not predictable. What are they thinking? Oh right... fools from Stanfurd...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[patches7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2010 11:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[@patches7 <br><br>Yes, because as we all know, if Stanford is known for one thing, it's for having absolute idiots on its campus and for never innovating anything. Yea, definitely sounds like Stanford...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[paul34]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 1:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA["... gains foothold in California"   So you would say the earthquake software is on "stable ground"? Ha ha ha!!!!!!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[XenoTheSilly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 1:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SkonOfVulcan lol nice]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mcderkaderk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 6:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why are they bothering? I mean sure it's a cool concept but I think professional equipment can detect vibration immediately and send out a notice faster seeing as how they're designed to pick up these things. Even if there's only one such device every 20 miles or so, it's not like it takes long for the earthquake to travel that distance.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chrisk1590]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 1:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ChrisK15 <br><br>yes, but the main point here is that it'd be much much cheaper using people's laptops instead of million dollar equipment. and if the results are the same, then it could be just as accurate. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wiggyfuzz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 2:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh my God, my laptop is shaking...it must be an earthquake...lllleetsss ch chc eeck the ssooftwwwaaree...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bobot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 5:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[@touchmygadget Lol Thatd be so win]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mcderkaderk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 6:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[How convenient that the earth just decided to give California an earthquake to test the software.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 7:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[@KConradG <br><br>Beat me to it.  Damn thing woke me up at 4 this morning.  I'm tired!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[decypher44]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 9:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[When your laptop is shaking it's too late. At most it will buy you a few seconds if a nearby group of laptops gives off the signal.<br><br>The ideal solution is to have an active real time simulation of the earths innards at any given moment running on a monstrous computer. That way these things can be predicted weeks or days before. Of course there is no way get the data to do something like this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[VampireHunter Z]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 10:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/earthquake-detection-software-gains-foothold-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thanks Engadget.... You tell us that they are ready to collect data and then less than 12hrs later I am jolted awake by a nice little data pack for them..... coincidence.... I think not]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wet tortillia]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 12:09PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
