http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/auos-65-inch-3d-hdtv-panel-headed-for-the-conveyer-belt-in-2h-2/ Engadget Comments for AUO's 65-inch 3D HDTV panel headed for the conveyer belt in 2H 2010, boasts polarized specs http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/auos-65-inch-3d-hdtv-panel-headed-for-the-conveyer-belt-in-2h-2/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/auos-65-inch-3d-hdtv-panel-headed-for-the-conveyer-belt-in-2h-2/Mar 16th 2010 5:40AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/auos-65-inch-3d-hdtv-panel-headed-for-the-conveyer-belt-in-2h-2/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/auos-65-inch-3d-hdtv-panel-headed-for-the-conveyer-belt-in-2h-2/Mar 16th 2010 5:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/auos-65-inch-3d-hdtv-panel-headed-for-the-conveyer-belt-in-2h-2/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/auos-65-inch-3d-hdtv-panel-headed-for-the-conveyer-belt-in-2h-2/Mar 16th 2010 9:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/auos-65-inch-3d-hdtv-panel-headed-for-the-conveyer-belt-in-2h-2/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/auos-65-inch-3d-hdtv-panel-headed-for-the-conveyer-belt-in-2h-2/Don't bet on glass-less 3D televisions.

Some autostereoscopic displays require that ever viewer hold their head in a precise position. If you move your head 3 inches left or right, the 3D becomes inverted! Other autostereoscopic displays track your eye position using cameras, but they only work for one viewer! Forget it, consumers will not accept these kind of limitations!]]>Mar 16th 2010 10:54AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/auos-65-inch-3d-hdtv-panel-headed-for-the-conveyer-belt-in-2h-2/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/auos-65-inch-3d-hdtv-panel-headed-for-the-conveyer-belt-in-2h-2/Mar 16th 2010 9:02AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/auos-65-inch-3d-hdtv-panel-headed-for-the-conveyer-belt-in-2h-2/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/auos-65-inch-3d-hdtv-panel-headed-for-the-conveyer-belt-in-2h-2/So now we're looking at different implementations of 3D with varying quality. Now consumers, depending on which 3D TV they get to test out will have a really wide range of opinions on 3D and make the already difficult sell even harder.
Well at least we'll have a variety of choices. ]]>Mar 16th 2010 9:50AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/auos-65-inch-3d-hdtv-panel-headed-for-the-conveyer-belt-in-2h-2/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/auos-65-inch-3d-hdtv-panel-headed-for-the-conveyer-belt-in-2h-2/Mar 16th 2010 1:32PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/auos-65-inch-3d-hdtv-panel-headed-for-the-conveyer-belt-in-2h-2/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/auos-65-inch-3d-hdtv-panel-headed-for-the-conveyer-belt-in-2h-2/
none are 3D.
3D stands for 3 dimension, in which case all 3 axes, x, y, and z are VALID.
so you can really see new details in the depth.

in the current trend of so-called 3D, it is in fact, 2 2-dimensional planes, nothing more.

so when moving your head a bit, you cannot seen anything additionnal.

true TD will only be there when holographic TD will come. Until then, calling this 3D is wrong.
the correct name is Stereoscopy.

]]>Mar 16th 2010 3:35PM