<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[OH NOOO!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AlDeezy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 11:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Aldeezy The kool-aid man disapproves your message<br>OOOH-YEEEAAHHH]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexpeegs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 11:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Aldeezy <br><br>Steve Jobs is going to have a heart attack if he finds out other companies are copying his ability to be a deuche.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mentat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 12:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[when did sucking become cool???<br>sammy you don't need to do this!<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[unwynd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 12:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Aldeezy <br><br>I'm surprised Google did not trademark the name for hardware. This could create problems.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adrian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 2:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Mentat  <br><br>It's almost like some people only just discovered the US had a patent system.<br><br>This has been going on for decades, kid, not just the last few months]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[redcard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 2:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@realar  They probably ran into a case of it being taken and either thought it wasn't necessary and/or not worth the cost.  It sounds like Sammy bought it thinking it was worth the cost to create a trademark-monopoly they could profit off from.  Could create problems is right, definitely will prevent some fixes.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 17th 2010 1:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[everything put aside<br>how does it help the customers there?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wolverine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 11:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@wolverine <br><br>... a company helps investors not customers<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mentat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 1:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@wolverine It helps their own pockets not consumers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noitora]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 3:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[Andro = Android?<br><br>Give me a break....ffs...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plazmic Flame]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 11:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Plazmic Flame Good thing it's 4 letters and not 3.  Otherwise Samsung would then own 'And'...  That would be trouble.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[amneziac]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 1:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@amneziac  <br><br>A N D R O = 5 letters not 4?  o.O]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jinjin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 1:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Plazmic Flame <br>I think it's four characters in Korean. <br>An = 1 letter, <br>d = 1 letter,<br>ro = 1 letter,<br>i = 1 letter,<br>d = 1 letter.<br>So, Andro-1 from LG is fine. They actually named it Androi-1, but then had to change to Andro-1 because of Samsung.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 4:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Dori  <br>To further elaborate:<br>안 = An<br>드 = d<br>로 = ro<br>이 = i<br>드 = d<br><br>So any company in Korea, other than Samsung, can't use more than 4 or more of those Korean characters.<br><br>LG's Andro-1 is a good example of avoiding this trademark issue:<br>안 = An<br>드 = d<br>로 = ro<br>원 = 1<br><br>If they added the "i" sound, 이, they would've violated the trademark.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Big Al]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 10:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Big Al  I'm going to try to clarify something, and I might be wrong, but I believe I am correct from combining my language knowledge with my experience following the cell phones here in Korea.  You are trying to Hangulize the word android, and technically (though the source article does the same thing) these are not characters being used but syllables (at least by the western interpretation of Hangul and their characters).  So, " 안" is a syllable, and a combination of 3 characters.  Furthermore, every time I see Android (most notably the most popular device the Motoroi), it is never in Hangul, it is always in Roman characters, meaning this analysis of characters versus syllables is splitting hairs unnecessarily.  I'll have to look into it more though.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 17th 2010 1:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Big Al  To my uneducated eye, it would actually be:<br><br>안 = Policeman holding a baton<br>드 = desktop computer<br>로 = desktop computer connected to network<br>이 = cyclops indifferent<br>드 = desktop computer<br><br>And yes I did very often get completely lost walking around Incheon airport in Seoul.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 24th 2010 9:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why? Judging by their previous releases I didn't think that Samsung really "digged" android.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[stevedhalai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 11:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SteveDhalai this is why they are doing this : they want to promote their own Bada crap, so the less competitors are visible the better they will do with it...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 11:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SteveDhalai That's what I'd like to know. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noitora]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 3:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sounds like Apple and Samsung could be best friends.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 11:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@fpad77 ....and M$, and AMD, and Sony, and Toshiba, and Nokia, etc etc.<br><br>Don't be a narrow minded fool as all companies do whatever they can to increase market share and sales.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Izzy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 12:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bullshitexpresscom  <br><br>Mostly I see narrow minded fools replacing S's with dollar signs, and confusing patent/TM trolling with responsible corporate behavior. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 12:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@fpad77 <br><br>Apple does buy a lot of memory from Samsung. Another attack in the  proxy war.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adrian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 2:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@fpad77 <br><br>Cos Apple invented the patent system]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[redcard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 2:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[way to take advantage of the systems flaws sammy]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[edu3000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 11:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Edobe <br>The Samsung Android with Bada OS]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnTitor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 11:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[Way to shove it to the hand that fed you, Samsung.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Look_Around_You]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 11:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[Samsung is becoming very aggressive in the mobile market. They were a small player in NA, but fairly large in the far east. Now with the slew of devices there releasing, on WinMo, Android, and BADA they are attempting to grab a very large market share.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KingFaisal94]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 11:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@KingFaisal94 Huh?<br><br>Are you on crack? Samsung has the most market share in the US. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mario Mejia]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 12:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's just retarded.  Kick Samsung out of the Open Handset Alliance immediately; Samsung has gone rogue.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gerrrg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 7:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[KICK them out of the Open Handset Alliance; Samsung has gone rogue, and no longer deserves to be included.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gerrrg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 11:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@gerrrg I guess $amsung is a part of the AXIS of EVIL<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[I am.......BALLOONBOY]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 12:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@gerrrg i just wrote to them the oha]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Atlantian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 17th 2010 3:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@gerrrg <br><br>Apparently I was so mad at Samsung, I posted twice.  Who knew?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gerrrg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 17th 2010 4:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[well that's just plain stupid. I hope the open handset alliance force samsung to allow other hardware makers to use the android branding on their hardware (maybe refuse to validate new devices for samsung until they allow royalty free use of the android hardware branding).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[human_error]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 11:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@humanerror It only affects the hardware, not the software.  I think a lot of readers are misinterpreting the blog (hopefully it's not me).  So any manufacturer can have an Android phone, they just can't "name" the hardware something like "Android F1 Cool" or anything like that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Izzy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 12:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bullshitexpresscom  <br><br>I know it is for the hardware - but to own the ability to brand phones "android" phones as part of their hardware name is lame and should not be allowed still as it gives a competetive advantage due to brand recognition of the android OS. It would be as if HP owned the right to name pcs "windows" computers and stop anyone else from doing so.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[human_error]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 1:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[LG is going to shine with WP7S, they don't really care :-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 11:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[Does George Lucas own "Droid" out there? May be worth giving him some monies LG and telling Samsung to GTFO.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ChazClout]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 11:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ChazClout <br><br>If you think Star Wars was the first use of the term Android you really need to try a little research<br><br>"The word derives from ανδρός, the genitive of the Greek ανήρ anēr, meaning "man", and the suffix -eides, used to mean "of the species; alike" (from eidos, "species"). Though the word derives from a gender-specific root, its usage in English is usually gender neutral. The term was first mentioned by St. Albertus Magnus in 1270[3] and was popularized by the French writer Villiers in his 1886 novel L'Ève future, although the term "android" appears in US patents as early as 1863 in reference to miniature human-like toy automatons."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Major4Play]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 12:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@fourthletter  <br>I was on about the trademarked term "Droid" owned by LucasFilm and was wondring if (like Verizion have done in the U.S) LG could licence the "Droid" name instead of using Android.<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droid" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droid</a><br><br>(This is all assuming that LucasFilm owns "Droid" in korea)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ChazClout]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 12:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@fourthletter  <br><br>I love it when people are in such a hurry to demonstrate their knowledge that they miss someone else's point entirely, and end up looking stupid. <br><br>Don't you?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 12:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ChazClout  Again, they have two patent and trademark systems, I doubt Lucasfilms owns the hardware trademark on the word droid in Korea.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Izzy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 12:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bullshitexpresscom  <br>For bullshitexpress, you sure know your shit! :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ChazClout]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 12:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@fourthletter<br>Um, I don't think there's a reference to the word "android" in Star Wars.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ilh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 1:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ilh  well that would depend on who you're talking to I suppose.  But I think many are aware that 'droid' is short for 'android'.  And if you think there's no reference to that...well, you lose all geek privileges.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[amneziac]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 1:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[Samsung has nice hardware, it was software that is lacking, now with android is a win win situation.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 12:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[We must we constantly read stories about patent legal mumbo-jumbo no-one at Engadget really understands ?<br>Chances are LG and Samsung already have cross-licensing agreements and this all has to do with KIRFS and knock offs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Major4Play]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 12:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/samsung-acquires-android-trademark-for-mobile-hardware-sales-i/</guid><description><![CDATA[@techlord<br><br>Are you on crack?? Samsungs hardware sucks, their screens are the only thing worth a damn.<br>I dare you to but a "Samsung Mythic" piece of garbage.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Huddleston]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2010 12:17PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
