<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[While this certainly gives me a hadron, Lady GaGa makes it go away.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[paul34]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@paul34 speak for yourself <a href="http://www.interscope.com/artist/news/default.aspx?nid=24937&aid=599&cmnt=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.interscope.com/artist/news/default.aspx?nid=24937&aid=599&cmnt=1</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KeegdnaB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@paul34 It could be possible to take Lady GaGa away by making tiny black holes appear all around her.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iispyderii]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@paul34 That's probably because Lady Gaga can get a hardon too]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[10nisman94]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@paul34 At least we can all be certain, large colliders will never be low brow.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kal326]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sounds like fun.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aurailious]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's not 3.5 trillion electron votls, it's 3.5 Tera electron volts, which is actually really small. 1 trillionth of an electron volt. 1eV is only 1.8 x 10^-19 Joules to begin with. That being said, it is quite large for a particle accelerator]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[10nisman94]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@10nisman94 <br>Yeah, what he said. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[macmann]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@10nisman94 <br><br>Yup, here's a C&P directly from CERN's glossary, the last line gives you an idea of the energy the protons have.<br>"Electronvolt (eV)<br><br>A unit of energy or mass used in particle physics. One eV is extremely small, and units of a million electronvolts, MeV, or thousand million electronvolts, GeV, are more common. The latest generation of particle accelerators reaches up to several million million electronvolts, TeV. One TeV is about the energy of motion of a flying mosquito." ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wifigod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@10nisman94 <br><br>The Tera prefix actually does mean trillion, not trillionth. The article was correct in saying 3.5 trillion electronvolts. Also, one electronvolt is equal to 1.6x10^-19 Joules, not 1.8.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RavenousBBT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@RavenousBBT  <br>Schooled]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EntropicDecay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@10nisman94 <br>Tritto, it's tera-electron-volts, 3.5 of which is about equivalent to force of the beating of a mosquito's wing.<br><br>Protons are really small, though, so that means a lot to them.  Us crushing a blade of grass is no big deal, but to an ant underneath that blade of grass that is catastrophic force.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Sonne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@10nisman94 <br>thats what SHE said]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kaasinees]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@10nisman94 <br><br>hardcore fail man, what the article said was correct]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[micks]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kaasinees  <br><br>BTW the collider itself uses a lot more than a few TeV.<br>The collision of the particles produced 3.5 TeV.<br><br>Google: 1 teraelectron volt(TeV) = 1.60217646 × 10-7 joules<br><br>notice the minus. thats 9 zeros]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kaasinees]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 3:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kaasinees  <br><br>Sorryy i was wrong. The particle beams moved at 3.5 TeV.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kaasinees]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 3:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just to clarify a bit for people.  A simple way to think of electron volts is the following:  1eV is equal to the energy an electron gains by being accelerated across a 1 volt potential gradient.  In other words, if you have a stationary electron (yes i know, hypothetical) at 0V and an electrode at 1V, that electron will be accelerated in the electric field toward the 1V electrode and will reach that electrode with a total energy of 1eV.  Therefore you can think of 3.5TeV as the equivalent of accelerating an electron using a 3.5 trillion volt potential gradient.  Hopefully this helps to put the figure back into its rightfully mind-blowing status for all of you.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jonallen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 3:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@10nisman94 <br><br>Yep, volt is a unit of power, however eV is a unit of energy and a very small amount of energy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[theSmartguy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 3:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@10nisman94 <br><br>Yep, volt is a unit of power, however eV is a unit of energy and a very small amount of energy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[theSmartguy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 3:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@10nisman94 and I thought genius is going to point out the difference between "electronvolt" and "electron volt"... nope.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lpppppl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 4:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[Of course, you have to keep in mind that that's the energy per proton. Looking at the CERN brochure [ <a href="http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1165534/files/CERN-Brochure-2009-003-Eng.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1165534/files/CERN-Brochure-2009-003-Eng.pdf</a> ], they have 10^11 protons per bunch, each of them with that energy and then they have 2808 of these bunches.<br><br>Converted into joule, this gives an energy of ~157444560 J or 157 megajoule, which is the energy of an average car travelling roughly at 560 km/h.<br><br>That's not too shabby.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tirian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 5:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheSmartGuy  No. The watt is the standard unit for power. The volt is a unit for voltage. Voltage is not power. The electronvolt is a unit of energy.<br><br>"but that sure is a lot of volts!" They are not volts!!!!!! They do not measure voltage!!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jedidove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 5:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@wifigod  <br><br>It may not be a large force but it is if its just a few protons moving with the same energy as billions.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[duggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2010 3:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheSmartGuy  <br>volt is not a unit of power, volt is a unit of voltage.<br>Power is measured in Watts<br>Energy in Joules<br>Watt=Joule/second <br>Power is energy over time.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nandy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 22nd 2010 7:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@andy6  <br>actually if you want to get technical volt is a measure of energy potential and can be easily converted  to any form of energy for thanks the the modern miracle of Laplace Transforms.  so before you correct someone, be correct.  <br><br>and for the record, while 7 TeV is about the same level of energy as 7 mosquitoes, if you divide by initial mass to get a non specific value, you wind up with a mosquito that could destroy cities.  so perspective is important in this, relativistic collisions are cool.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[me_eit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 9:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[LHC< Lady Ga Ga < Sean Connery]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chewy71]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Chewy71<br><br>LHC < Lady Ga Ga < Sean Connery < Chuck Norris.<br><br>End of discussion.<br>Anything you say in response will be translated by Chuck Norris as asking for a roundhouse kick to the head.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mike808]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 3:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mike808 Lmao!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Irondog]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 4:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[this thing is absurd. i love it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kojo87]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wanna take a ride on your disco stick <br>B================>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hdawggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@hdawggy Dildo stick?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erasure25]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 22nd 2010 3:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[f my calculations are correct, when this baby hits eighty-eight TeV per hour... you're gonna see some serious shit. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dill0n]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dill0n Great Scott......]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian Lippert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bazookafx3  This is heavy]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Antwan L. Payne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 3:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[Come on LHC we want the world to end already!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[I cant wait until this thing makes renewable energy.  Cars will run forever]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JCreazy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@JCreazy <br>Yup indeed, with a small circle of 27 kilometers of circumference in the trunk]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Genicus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Genicus  <br>Looks like the hummer will finally be outsized]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 3:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[Lady Gaga > Everything]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@fauxcivility <br><br>Everything > Lady Gaga<br><br>Hell, even iPad > Lady Gaga]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Physicsguy89]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 3:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Physicsguy89<br>"Everything > Lady Gaga"<br><br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIeCrj_Gn6A" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIeCrj_Gn6A</a><br><br>ORLY?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Professor Hubert J Farnsworth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 3:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Professor Hubert J Farnsworth  <br>I followed one of the links at the end of that video.  I caught myself watching a tutorial on how to do a Lady Gaga makeup, but I finished it anyway... thx alot...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[onlymyrailgun]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2010 2:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Physicsguy89  <br>"Hell, even iPad > Lady Gaga"<br><br>I'll accept that as true IFF Apple donates the proceeds from its first production run to HIV/AIDS research and education.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erasure25]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 22nd 2010 3:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[Lady who?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mcc <br>lady gagger]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kaasinees]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kaasinees  <br>Mick Jagger?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zaro27]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 3:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[Awesome! Love LHC news and this is probably the punniest post title in a while.  <br><br>PLUS, finally a post with a lot of comments that isn't hijacked by Team Edward vs Team Jacob! (read: fanboys and haters.)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[avronko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 2:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[They aren't gonna stop until the same thing that happened in "Flash Forward" happens to us.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[crearian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 3:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@crearian The television version of Flash Forward is an adaption of the book of the same name where it's the LHC that does indeed cause the blackout.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shokz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 10:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LHC breaks its own energy record, still less powerful than Lady Gaga]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/lhc-breaks-its-own-energy-record-still-less-powerful-than-lady/</guid><description><![CDATA[@crearian Well, they had at least a quadrillion electron volts, sooo...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mattg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2010 11:46PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
