<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks Yummy!  Hurry up with the Hands-On!!  haha]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[InnocentEd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 1:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@InnocentEd <br><br>Agreed!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ambient80]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 1:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@InnocentEd <br><br>I think I juist sh** my pants.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adenosine2010]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@InnocentEd  After the lack of support for my Samsung Galaxy (i7500) I'm not willing by any chance to buy another Samsung phone. Don't get me wrong, I like their products but Customer Service really makes a big difference. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Techno1q]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Still more excited about the Supersonic.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[IKON]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Techno1q After the lack of support for my Samsung Omnia HD (i8910) I'm not willing by any chance to buy another Samsung phone. Don't get me wrong, I like their products but Customer Service really makes a big difference.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[G]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified)  ... After the lack of support for my Samsung Behold II (SGH-T939) I'm not willing by any chance to buy another Samsung phone. Don't get me wrong, I like their products but Customer Service really makes a big difference.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shawn1224]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 3:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now we're talking!<br>Finally a non-tuning-chav designed android mobile (the only other android phone with decent design is the droid but that has keyboard so thats a minus for me).<br>Either Palm hurries up with Pre sucessor and launches it in Portugal, or i will get this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[doutorpiranha]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 4:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@InnocentEd Another refreshing phone from samsung, i'm glad it landed on android, unlike their first one. <a href="http://bit.ly/samsung-messiah-phone-almost" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/samsung-messiah-phone-almost</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[geleenlianne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 24th 2010 12:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@InnocentEd : To bad the HTC Evo 4G completely killed this.... and knocked the spotlight onto itself... it actually looks kinda good... but the Evo just kicks it's butt. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 25th 2010 4:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@blenderman345  Actually, from recently released specs, the EVO is 4x slower in GPU and some % in CPU.  EVO is looking really really OLD now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NuShrike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 26th 2010 2:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[4"...1GHZ...Android? OH shit.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 1:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Steven <br>This is a big F$%^ing deal!<br>                        -Joe Biden]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Julio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Steven Samsung+Android? :$]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gpmoo7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Steven <br>Meh.  Specs are hawt, but Samsung UI has always been awful.  TouchWiz is such an eyesore...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tonicboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Steven<br><br>Now we know who bought up all those HD2 spare parts since it's not going WP7S.<br><br>Looks pretty good. It's solidly built, has a good onscreen keyboard and 3G GSM (that means you T-mobile), then I'm in for one.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[recharged95]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Steven <br><br>You know that was an excellent 'OH SHIT' right up until HTC pissed all over Samsung's Parade and outted the Supersonic (EVO 4G).<br><br>Suddenly 4" isn't enough (Yea, that's what she said).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Slick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 5:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@tonicboy  I wiz every time I touch it...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samurai Jack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 7:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Steven <br>I want this + root it + install latest Cyanogen mod with Nexus UI + maintain divx/xvid support = Best phone in the universre]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TareG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 17th 2010 3:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[I need Super AMOLED on my next mobile device.  Need, need, need.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 1:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Coming from a behold 2 user.......I wish theyd just leave the stock Android UI instead of that touchwiz crap.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[abram]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 1:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@somebody7 Just noticed that :P  Sucks for the generalP, but I am glad rooting Android devices is fairly easy and I can put whatever ROM on I want on there :)  So my excitement is all about the hardware specs!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[InnocentEd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@somebody7 <br>You gotta give it to them that they're the only Android UI I've seen without that darn programs arrow!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Metro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 3:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@somebody7: Why would anyone get a Behold 2 and not a myTouch?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brendon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 6:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@somebody7 <br>An XDA rom should sort it out pretty quickly]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chansthename]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 24th 2010 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[... Err... That's the most iPhone-ish looking Android phone I've seen.  Don't know if I approve, but the specs are nice.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sodaboy581]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 1:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@sodaboy581 phone might look like iPhone, though it's bigger and the iPhone wishes it could make games and movies look as nice as this.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@juanvaldez  Yeah, I agree.  It's just... their blatant copy of the style of the iPhone's OS is kind of depressing.  If they were going to design a new UI for Android, they should have done something more original.  I love Android, but I don't like to get iPhone in my Android.  It's whatever, though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sodaboy581]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@juanvaldez  Looks very similar to the iphone screen, but the specs are way better]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dswatson83]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jawman  <br><br>You must be blind.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[oghowie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@sodaboy581 why i hate acknowledging apple in any way, this is prob excellent marketing by samsung.  take the look, up the performance, don't look back.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[owen66]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@owen66  Probably.  They're most likely betting on the fact that the iPhone is very easy to use, even for the very young and the very old, so they want to provide the power and flexibility of Android while giving a familiar user interface.  I can totally understand it.  It still might rub a few people the wrong way. ;)  Oh well, just have to see if they're able to run far with this...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sodaboy581]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@sodaboy581 \<br><br>iPhone clone much?<br><br>So long as the android fanboys admit that I honestly don't care. All the Apple haters want Apple to fail and claim how much they hate it but look at yet another company trying to copy Apple's success.<br><br>Physical form factor aside though Samsung has ALWAYS made nice looking phones and but I always hear that they don't support their products after launch....<br><br>And lets not forget that the iPhone has the App Store which is miles ahead of android.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheLondonExchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@sodaboy581 <br><br>yeah. I'm not feeling the icons at all.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ror]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ror  Well, a good thing is, you can probably turn off the Samsung UI, just like you can turn off Sense UI on other Android phones.  So if this phone turns out to be a sexy beast, hardware wise, you can still use stock Android UI or install another UI later.  Maybe even throw Sense yourself.<br><br>The thing that puts me off of manufacturer provided UIs with Android phones is the time it takes for official Android updates to come out for them.  Hope this isn't a problem with this Samsung device.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sodaboy581]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@sodaboy581  The thing that puts me off of manufacturer provided UIs with Android phones is the time it takes for official Android updates to come out for them. Hope this isn't a problem with this Samsung device.<br><br>I think this puts me off with or without the mfg provided UIs.  Google has to do something about this, allow customers to be more in charge of getting an update without the carrier/mfg delays.  I don't see this happening within the next 12 months, but if Google can get big enough in the game, then I think, hope and want it to happen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@sodaboy581  <br>Samsung's logo should be: "We take good hardware, then ruin it with our UI."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TareG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@sodaboy581 <br><br>it looks absurdly like an iPhone<br><br>Shame Samsung, everyone else in the android game is at least trying to have an original skin of sorts, but apparently your software engineers just threw in the towel.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Slick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@sodaboy581 <br><br>Agreed 100% came here to comment the exact same thing. Maybe Android wants to be like Mike, I mean iPhone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jaylittles531]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@sodaboy581 <br>It does look like an iPhone, Look + UI.. sigh<br><br>Incoming Apple vs Samsung Galaxy Trial..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[airbag888]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is that really the OS? Copy Apple much? Talk about opening themselves to litigation..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 1:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Serus <br> I don't care about litigation. Bud dang Android is a nice Os why would they need to copy iphone...........And what the hell was the purpose of Bada if they aren't going to put it on a high-end deivice. Useless.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[peter wagner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Mgrim  The Wave will have Bada and be high end.  Bluetooth 3.0, wireless N, super AMOLED (though smaller screen)<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Serus <br><br>I'm sorry...remind me when Apple invented the grid of icons again.<br><br>Nokia amongst others might want to have a word with them: <a href="http://bit.ly/aPph60" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/aPph60</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Serus Blame it on TouchWiz 3.0. they use the same UI on the Wave which runs Bada. But I gotta admit, its at least looks better than previous versions of ToucWiz, which just plain sucked.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noitora]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Tes  <br><br>Not to mention the old Palm OS.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tcc3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 3:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Tes  Do you seriously not understand the OP was talking about the use of horizontal pages denoted by white dots? Or maybe the dock at the bottom? How about how the phone icon is the same, or how the music icon is the iTunes logo (which doesn't even make sense on a device that can't play CDs)? None of those things seem relevant to you?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 24th 2010 1:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Impressive... On Paper<br><br>Looking forward to a full review]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DaHarder]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 1:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Still waiting on Supersonic.  4.3", 1Ghz, Android, SenseUI instead of Touchwiz, Wimax, etc.  Still, the Super AMOLED is cool.  Can't wait for it to start popping up in other devices.  Still, I wish they could come out with these kinds of 20% incremental improvements in *battery life* and not only screen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[neodorian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-android-smartphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jerbear He said it uses 20% less power as well in the keynote.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Charbax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2010 2:04PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
