http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/ Engadget Comments for LG unveils first Full LED 3D HDTV -- the 22.3mm-thin LX9500 http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 7:51AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 8:17AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 9:55AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/
I really would like to know what's under the bezel that makes it so hard to remove.]]>Mar 25th 2010 10:20AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/With 3D the whole world soon will be 4-eye nerds! ]]>Mar 25th 2010 2:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/
The bezel provides structural support -- similar to a window frame or a picture frame -- and carries the entire weight of the glass and internal components during shipping and handling. A completely frameless design would be more difficult to ship and install, and would be more expensive because of the higher likelihood of damage/failure.]]>Mar 25th 2010 4:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 8:00AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/
You can't. The 2 guys in the picture bought them already from getanewkoreanwife.com

Haha.]]>Mar 25th 2010 8:09AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/
lol +1 ]]>Mar 25th 2010 8:16AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/
lol good one]]>Mar 25th 2010 9:10AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 9:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Korean chicks are cool. Well, almost as cool as Korean tech.]]>Mar 25th 2010 10:23AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 8:03AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/
I highly doubt that it is more than a nominal amount.

The TV isn't processing much (more) of anything - it's just a video signal just like anything else. A higher refresh rate might have made a difference back in the CRT days, but an LCD's refresh rate is not the same as having an electronic beam race across the width of your screen.

I think you are confusing screen technology (LCD, LED and Plasma) with viewing technology like stereo 3D.

]]>Mar 25th 2010 9:01AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 8:03AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/
Is it me or those guys look... flat?]]>Mar 25th 2010 8:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/When you said "guys", you meant "girls", right?]]>Mar 25th 2010 10:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 8:09AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 8:09AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 8:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 8:18AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 8:20AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 8:42AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/
(And its not as if people who wear glasses are in the minority!!!!)]]>Mar 25th 2010 8:58AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 9:31AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/
Dur ... easily said ... but I haven't seen ANY on the market and even the large sunglasses type UCG Cinema's hand out aren't comfortable (forget the showcase ones!)

As daft as it sounds, you need some form of ski-mask type set-up to watch anything in 3D comfortably with glasses ... so the answer isn't so mind blowing after all clever clogs :o)]]>Mar 25th 2010 9:56AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 9:00AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/
hehe seriously... I hate them being called LED TVs when they're really LCD. Now I'm going to go hop in my halogen car and go make something in my fluorescent kitchen.]]>Mar 25th 2010 11:17AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/
LG trademarked the term, "Full LED." I think they mean back-lit as opposed to edge-lit. The press release (linked above) states, "As the world’s first Full LED 3D TV, the LX9500 uses an innovative backlight structure to deliver spectacular pictures for the ultimate 3D experience. Illuminated by panels of LEDs directly behind the screen (the 55-inch model boasts 1,200 LEDs), the Full LED display provides images of exceptional brightness and clarify [sic] for unrivalled picture quality."]]>Mar 25th 2010 4:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/
Makes sense. I guess they had to come up with a term other than local dimming since presumably it doesn't support that despite having an array of LEDs.]]>Mar 26th 2010 6:37PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 9:00AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 9:00AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 9:15AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Bragging rights. That's about it.]]>Mar 25th 2010 11:37AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/
Visual appeal of a less obtrusive, wall-mounted display. Depending on how the display is mounted, it may not make a difference. Thickness is only relevant because of legacy technology. Narrow-depth displays will become standard as the industry transitions to LED.]]>Mar 25th 2010 4:42PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 9:17AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 9:28AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/
But I like these asian companies LG, Samsung. They release their products here pretty soon after their global launch, unlike other European and American counterparts who think India needs only reject or outdated technologies.]]>Mar 25th 2010 10:02AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 10:37AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/To be honest I'm stilling waiting for 55 inch 3D OLED TV that doesn't break the bank. I think it is still at least 5 years away to be reality]]>Mar 25th 2010 10:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/
OLED, then Autostereoscopic 3D.]]>Mar 25th 2010 10:38AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 10:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 11:40AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 1:24PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/
Seems like a step backwards.]]>Mar 25th 2010 1:32PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/
The press release lists the display as 400Hz (480Hz). I suspect the 400Hz models are for markets using 50Hz, and 480Hz versions go to markets using 60Hz.]]>Mar 25th 2010 4:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 1:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/
It doesn't look 3D to me. In fact, it looks a little flat.]]>Mar 25th 2010 2:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/Mar 25th 2010 2:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/lg-unveils-first-full-led-3d-hdtv-the-22-3mm-thin-lx9500/west refers to US and Europe, east = asia.

Im sure you already knew that though.]]>Mar 25th 2010 4:30PM