<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nub nub nub nub's rule!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adobephile]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@RockNStuff <br>Its called a nipple, sillyboy. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nitesh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Nitesh  <br>actually, i believe the technical term is "mouse nubbins"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mrmechanic18]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 4:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Nitesh  No, if it were a nipple, there would be two of them. It's a clit mouse!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dhomas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 4:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@RockNStuff <br><a href="http://xkcd.com/243/" rel="nofollow">http://xkcd.com/243/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Luke Skywalker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 4:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@RockNStuff   <br> <br>Does anyone know if this notebook (AMD Neo Mv40 + ATI GPU) would be comparable to an old 1.4ghz apple ibook G4?  I'm hoping that it is at least as fast as that, anybody know?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rube]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 6:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ruby  <br>I have no idea how powerful that processor was, but it sounds old. For reference, even Atom processors are faster than Pentium 4's and M's.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ninetynine99]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 7:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ninetynine99  An atom is nowhere near the single thread performance of an old Pentium M. Do not give your opinion as "reference" cheers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TylerDurden]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 8:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@RockNStuff <br>It not call nub or nipple it's call a trackpoint.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[k2001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 8:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@RockNStuff Pretty sleek. Take note, the price is 549 Dollars only! I think it couldn't be any better than that. Opinions: <a href="http://bit.ly/x100e-by-lenovo-view" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/x100e-by-lenovo-view</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ninawoodies]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 12:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[did they miss the 5 yellow stars on the cover?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[htd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's a lower 3dMark06 score then my Mini 311 which gets 1700...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zvx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Vdek <br><br>Which isn't surprising considering Ion is quite a bit better than an HD 3200.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[midnightblade]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 8:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Amd processor..... OK decision. But whats up with the energy star thing at the top right of the screen? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[deliteguy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@deliteguy It's a review model - they're not going to peel off the stickers for these photos.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Ochs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm not anti-AMD but those battery life scores are the opposite of what I'm looking for in a small laptop. :(  They just haven't managed to put out a decent low-power processor.  Sure, it's faster than an Atom with integrated graphics, but looking at the benchmarks I doubt it outruns even the SU2700 in my current laptop which gets much better battery life (though I'm sure the ATI graphics are much better).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[old_fogie_late_bloomer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 4:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Old fogie late bloomer  There is no question that AMD lags behind in energy efficient processor field, my C2S SU3500 outrun this thing in both performance and battery life. I think the decision to use AMD processor is solely based on cost, this is probably the only way to keep price below $600. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hmmwv]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 5:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Soooo tempted. <br>This may be the sweet spot for me. An excellent keyboard, touchpad alternative and non-glossy display ticks those seldom catered for ergonomic boxes.<br>Also, I've always kinda been an AMD guy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolfticket]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[i'd like ibm to come back and clean up the mess]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fabneon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have one. Got it back in February. I also have a netbook (eeePC) and to me the X100e does NOT feel like a netbook. My hands aren't cramped, I don't feel like I'm losing power by doing simple things. Now I need to figure out what to do with the eeePC. <br><br>Mind you it wasn't all nirvana. After running windown updates out of the box, it stopped shutting down properly. I ended up updating the BIOS then resetting to factory defaults to finally get it to behave the way it's suppose to. Sometimes my eyes don't love the smaller screen but hey that's what Control-+ on Firefox is all about! <br><br>I seem to get better battery life than you. But it could be because I didn't change it out of Energy Saver mode. I get about 4 to almost 4 1/2 hours of battery life. I think the price is a wee bit higher than it should be, but I don't care. I love Thinkpads and this works for me! I was surprise I don't use the Trackpoint as much as I would have thought. I love trackpoints. But it could be because the keyboard is smaller the point feels like it's not in the spot my big jumbly fingers want it to be.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[barb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@barbtx I can't figure out why anyone would call it a netbook when it's as heavy and chunky as it is.<br><br>Netbook = long battery life, tend to be 10" or less, etc<br>X100e =/= long battery life, 10" or less screen, etc<br><br>Engadget: "It's a netbook!"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BigD145]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 4:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@BigD145  <br><br>Lenovo likes to call this a "hybrid" at least they do on youtube.<br><br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nma93ugasww" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nma93ugasww</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[barb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 10:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[My God!<br><br>The images were like a horror movie. The more I viewed the uglier things got!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Saad Rabia]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Saad And we tried our best to make the red look good. Fail. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joanna Stern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Joanna Stern  <br><br>I thought it looked good. Not as good as my green Dell, but still acceptable.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HardToBelieve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Saad <br><br>It looks like a giant DS! Perhaps IBM and Nintendo will come out with the DS XXXL... :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kmannn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 4:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Flat bottom OR hump out the back. It's like it's impossible to have them both. I dislike apple products, but it seems they got it right. why cant IBM?!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Certifiedfryguy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Certifiedfryguy <br>I mean Lenovo.. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Certifiedfryguy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Certifiedfryguy Apple doesn't make anything that small. Batteries can only be made so small without sacrificing capacity and run-time. I suppose if they went the sealed-case route like Apple did they could get it a little bigger (custom-fit and molded batteries can eek out more power in the same chassis), but Apple's gotten enough heat for that already; I doubt anyone will follow in their footsteps.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Ochs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Certifiedfryguy Acer Timeline 11.6" series.  No junk in the trunk.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pokey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Certifiedfryguy I prefer the battery sticking out the back.  Perfect size grip to wrap my fingers around and carry.  You can't grip a laptop with a flat back as well.  I always recommend the extended battery form factor.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bigredboiler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 9:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've tried that keyboard, and it is indeed the best on any similarly-sized laptop. I'd go so far as to say it's better than my old Thinkpad T60, it's just that nicely designed.<br><br>Do an Atom/Ion rev of this, and I'll finally upgrade from my Eee 901.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Ochs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh yeah... glad I didn't get red. That thing is a touch on the fugly side.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[barb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[ThinkPAD? Ewww... what were they thinking? Does it come with a ThinkMAXI adapter? lolz.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Noah K <br><br>You aren't funny at all.<br><br>"NotePAD?! ewww... what were they thinking? Does it come with a MaxiPen too?! Lolz."<br><br>See? You can do it on anything with PAD in it. and it ISN't funny. Not at all.<br><br>Your comment is an epic failure.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[techee44]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 4:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I guess you missed the < /sarcasm > at the end of the post.<br><br>PS. You used the word epic in a reply. Seriously?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 4:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Noah K  <br><br>Maybe he missed it because it kinda wasn't there.<br><br>And sarcasm or not, it still isn't funny.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bigjaydogg3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 5:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a red Lenovo IdeaPad S10 and the finish on it look much better than this X100. I love the ThinkPad line but moving away from the trademark black is a bad idea. Keep the colors to the IdeaPad line.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LowSky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Lady Gaga, really?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rocketsfan20]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@rocketsfan20 <br><br>Lady GaGa is awesome]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yule&bellow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA["Design" = FAIL]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bashlt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm confident that they are going to offer the i5 ultra-low voltage version once those are in full production with Intel.  Then it will be the perfect machine.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mikegar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was so ready to buy this.  I drift into the store on occasion to remind myself what typing on it is like, which is wonderful, but the lack of HDMI keeps me from taking the plunge.  Such a silly thing to lack on a Radeon 3200!  I'm surprised the article doesn't mention that as an issue as it makes it impossible to make presentations or show videos when increasingly you only get an HDMI jack in an accessible location.<br><br>I do have a concern with the article, however.  It keeps trumpeting $550 everywhere, but doesn't mention what specs make it that.  I have never seen it sold for more than $450.  At least the base configuration.<br><br>My final point is that if this is anything like the DV2 it begs to be undervolted from AMDs aggressive voltage setting.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) Are you kidding? 90% or more of the projectors out there still have VGA inputs on them. In fact, I am yet to see a single projector with HDMI. And I spend half of my professional life in powerpoint/keynote hell. <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TylerDurden]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 4:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Our meeting rooms have all been switched over to either use LCD screens or hidden overhead projectors that have cables running down to in-table jacks with DVI (easy conversion to/from HDMI) and legacy composite.  (We just modernized last year.)  <br><br>IT issues the laptops so they get to choose hardware they want to support.  None of our dev hardware uses VGA outputs, anyway.  I would also suspect the long cable length might degrade or fry long-running adapters much like running a 50' DVI cable amusingly did to one of our machines.  It's a hassle to get to the hidden VGA ports if you really, really need them (sometimes we have a crawlspace in the back).<br><br>Besides, HDMI repeaters/switchboxes are relatively easy to come by now.  VGA versions of those almost always cause ghosting issues or have resolution limits unless you like spending more of your budget.  And they rarely support remote control.<br><br>Thus, I find it frustrating that modern hardware omits a very inexpensive component which most other laptops of this type (the Neo/Radeon) have.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 4:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified)  Huh? Please point out the milliard of neo/radeon laptops in this market segment and with that same form factor which use HDMI instead of VGA.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TylerDurden]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 8:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I for the life of me don't know why AMD hasn't had a die shrink for their ultraportable processor line.  Surely that would help bring things up to par.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rells009]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 3:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I demoed one of these for my company as an inexpensive alternative to our standard ThinkPad T and X models for our highly cost conscious Asia Pacific region. I have to say I was very impressed with it for its price vs. performance model. I think however in testing they may not have set the battery to maximum power savings in the Power Manager TVT (ThinkVantage Tools). I got consistently 4.5 hrs battery time running BurnInTest v5 with maximum battery savings setting. As for everything else, the X100e has most of the features that makes ThinkPads the best designed laptops for the enterprise use. Strong chassis, vibration isolation feet, spill resistant keyboard and accelerometer based HD protection. I definitely think it was a much better alternative to any Intel Atom based netbook system for business use.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[laureynsr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 4:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Battery life and heat or not, I prefer Thinkpad over everything else. I guess it like an Apple thing<br><br>[shutting down brain again when looking at this Thinkpad again]<br><br>disclaimer: typed on a Thinkpad X200]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wekkel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 4:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Wekkel<br><br>The Thinkpad x200 is one of the best computers ever made.  You can get them on ebay for around 650$ these days. That is SUCH a better deal with an x100e.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[*brotha]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2010 7:35PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
