<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not bad all I care about is the price and the wifi n]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cocopuffs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 12:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[@cocopuffs for one, its not cordless, and two, its TOO big.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[emopoops]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 12:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[@emopoops  I could find room for that but I have to admit it doesn't have the best specs ever but haul it's wifi n and some what stylish even tho the stylish thing should be last on my reason to buy something like this <br><br>Lol I'm not like an ipad lover I rather have good specs and software rather than just looks]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cocopuffs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 12:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[@cocopuffs <br>Some people need, 2.4/5GHz Wi-F N with gigaports and USB print sharing...but for this price, its not bad..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[abedinthehouse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 12:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[@cocopuffs <br><br>What's it with all Cisco articles? Is it becoming the new Apple for engadget? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DamnYourUgly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 4:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DamnYourUgly  <br><br>Well i prefer Cisco than Apple :P So i don't mind.<br><br>Btw this is a nice little router. I wonder what kind of configurations you are able to do with from the GUI provided ;)<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 9:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[@cocopuffs <br><br>Those Router Case's are fail. They heat up so much they lock up. the vent holes are all on the bottom of the device. I have a 310n and i have to reset it once a week. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James DiBernardo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 10:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 12:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[So is the Linksys brand officially gone or is this a new branch?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[~DavidT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 12:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DavidT nahh, this is just an easy alternative to the regular routers that are "to difficult" to set up. This product really should have no intrest to anyone reading this site really. Staples started selling them like 3 days ago]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 12:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[looks like my wrt120n with a color change, and not a good one at that. and can anybody suggest a good wireless n router that doesnt drop signal randomly like the aforementioned linksys?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tbirdman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 12:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[@keeb<br>Got a good deal a few weeks ago on a Rosewill a/g/n 2.4Ghz RNX-EasyN4 for $30 on NewEgg. I think it went back up in price recently, however, except now you get a "free" wireless adapter bonus, so I guess it's still basically the same.<br><br>Decent range with dual antennas, and enough options for most people. Plus I think it's DD-WRT compatible, but I still haven't figured out how to flash it properly yet.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ThreeDee912]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 12:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[@keeb You can blame the case design for that. The casing overheats like an EZ Bake oven because it doesn't permit enough airflow over the heatsinks. Every single router in their lineup that uses this design has this problem, from their cheapo 60 dollar Wireless-G jobbies, all the way up to the Dual Band N + Gigabit port-packing 200 dollar flagship line, yet they won't abandon the damn thing for whatever reason. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 4:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[asus rt-n16 with tomato<br><br>who would buy a router on looks and not specs ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[smeee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 12:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[@smeee did, but when other people are buying with you and are pushing the cheapest thing on you, what can you do.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tbirdman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 12:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why do routers have to be so big? It's 2010 guys.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[IcerC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 12:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[@IcerC i agree! like they should start selling the teeny tiny ones for less than that because it takes up less plastic or whatever its made of. also. they should be no larger than a car key]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[emopoops]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 12:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[@IcerC <br><br>Personally, I wish it was bigger. I want some range/power. This thing needs 3 antennas sticking out the back of it. I'm tired of all this internal crap. At least give me some spots to hook one up to]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EGOvoruhk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 12:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[@EGOvoruhk  I agree. It seems with N, they are not giving any options, unlike on the classic WRT54-G routers (you can still get a WRT54GL) you can hook up some honking huge antennas.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 10:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why bother selling a router these days that doesn't offer GigE ports? The Valet is a complete waste. And the price on both of these sucks, there's no reason to be paying over $100 for a wireless-N SOHO router with GigE.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dkratter14]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 12:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dkratter14 why bother selling these if they dont have the display built in, i mean cmon]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[emopoops]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 12:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[@emopoops what?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dkratter14]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 12:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dkratter14  d00d. the display isnt built in. it has a display whatever on your computer. it should have a display screen on the device.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[emopoops]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 2:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[Meh. Linksys's have looked like this for so long.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bootareen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 12:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MrAffrox<br><br>Yes as usual the well informed tech heads at Engadget just reprint the press release, Linksys have had this design for at least a year just not in the nasty pastel colours.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Major4Play]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 8:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[Install software for a router? Why? That's what the web interface is for.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 12:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Tammacho umm, either you're joking, or destined for a tea party near you.  How do you get on the web with a router that's not set up?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[unwired]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 12:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[@unwired <br><br>you connect to your router from your desktop/laptop via wired or wireless (if there is a default wireless network with your router)<br>then, <br>open up a web browser, and go to their setup interface page<br>(192.168.0.1 - dlink default; 192.168.1.1 - linksys default)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jaysim44]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 1:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[@unwired you're the one joking right, the web interfarce is for advance configuration no internet required, just enter the router ip]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hauxeye]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 1:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[@unwired <br><br>I believe Tammacho is referring to using a web browser to access the router's config. If he/she is, then you don't need an internet connection to do so. Many devices with IP addresses work like this. My modem, router, ip cameras, and raid card all can be accessed via a web browser regardless of an internet connection as long as they are on the same physical network as my computer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[needmoregigs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 1:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Tammacho @needmoregigs @jaysim44 @needmoregigs <br>Apologies to all, I wasn't entirely clear, I should have said 'web interface'.  The purpose of Valet is to make it simple.  You still need some kind of networking knowledge to connect to the router via web interface.  For non-techies, unless your IP address is in 192.168.1.0 network, you're screwed.<br>Now, drag me back up from oblivion :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[unwired]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 3:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[YepYepYep, I like. Esp. the whole USB set-up deal.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EagleyeSmith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 12:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[Personally, I like to keep my routers OUT OF sight...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 1:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[this looks just like my Linksys it's just lite Blue!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Quincy onQ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 1:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[Does this support HDDs/Flash/Printers on the USB port?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 1:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[No 5Ghz no go. 2.4 is extremely crowded in my neighborhood. I can't even use a standard wireless mouse. I guess if you are the person overpaying for this, you won't know the difference anyway...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[clexman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 1:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cisco stuff sucks. Which market are they after? Home or SMB? Styling says home, pricing means SMB. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CompleteShortStories]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 4:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[hmm, is it me or is that not a "new design", its just a linksys case sprayed gray and blue, just like the ones linksys have been pumping out for well over a year.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Geraint]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 4:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[Didn't Cisco learn from Apple that stealing their Airport idea for desktop based management hasn't been a good idea? At least, it hasn't been for Apple since hardly anybody buys them over a clean web based routers. I know I won't buy anything like this without at least web or ssh interfaces. I shouldn't have to install anything to control my network. And by the way, WPS buttons are easy enough for people even though WPA/WPA2 is already painfully easy compared to WEP. I guess the value in this idea is the USB slot on the back so long as the chips are supported to load it up with dd-wrt?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mkhpalm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 7:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[From the article it seems Cisco is going after the Belkin crowd.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dSTeVek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 7:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder how much the Geek Squad will charge for installing this and what their sales pitch is going to be.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 9:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[10/100 Ethernet ports?  People STILL use that??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DoctarPeppar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 9:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[dear Cisco, when will you learn that it's not the ease of setup that's keeping consumers away, but the ease of use.  your firmware is pure shit on most of your products which is why so many get returned and refurbished (and then flashed with DD-WRT).<br><br>fix your firmware and drop the price.  hell, just load DD-WRT on from the beginning.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[willow_twf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 10:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[Tomato is where it's at. Too bad only the WRT-54G pre version 4 or WRT-54GL can use it (I have one of each).<br><br>The concept of an install CD is RIDICULOUS. Web based interfaces should be used. It is not hard to configure the WPA or WEP keys and the like, it's all in the web interface. It's sad that Americans don't know this stuff by now, as we've had cable in most places, for what, 8 years now? Plus, if someone doesn't know how to configure WEP or WPA, RTFM.<br><br>This is only going to make network configuration MORE complicated, as at some point you have to retrieve the actual key anyways, as not all devices are going to be using Windows or Mac OS. The iPod Touch and Wii have to get on the network too, and they won't be able to use the configuration software.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 10:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah design is nice, but baby blue?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jahcriado]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 11:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'll stick with my WRT54GL. Sure it doesn't have N, but the thing hasn't had to be rebooted since I bought *4* years ago and w/ Tomato on it, it's one of the most robust routers you can buy on the consumer level.<br><br>I've convinced at least 10 people to buy one (over the 20 dollar special at Fry's) and put Tomato on it and they never have problems.<br><br>Cisco, give us a WRT54*N*L model I can put Tomato firmware on and then we'll talk upgrades.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 11:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[According to Cisco, the Internet looks like Saturn.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[soren121]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 3:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[Definitely not buying a router without detachable antennas. D-Link DIR-655 is a beasty..so good.<br><br>Anyway, these popped into the BBY in Midtown today along with Belkin's new Surf, Share, and Play routers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[merovingian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2010 10:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco's Valet routers take a cue from Flip's design department]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/31/ciscos-valet-routers-take-a-cue-from-flips-design-department/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks like their linksys device.  So is this thing cisco quality or linksys quality.  The latter, I'll pass.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nxp3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 3rd 2010 12:44AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
