<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Defective graphene sheets look poised to succeed silicon</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Defective graphene sheets look poised to succeed silicon</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Defective graphene sheets look poised to succeed silicon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</guid><description><![CDATA[Okay. Thanks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pavlindrom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2010 8:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Defective graphene sheets look poised to succeed silicon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</guid><description><![CDATA[Unless this is going to help AMD catch up with Intel like the good ol' days, I am not interested. The CPU market needs some stiffer competition. Look what wonders competition has done for the smart phone market! It has brought us the EVO.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shaka]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2010 9:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Defective graphene sheets look poised to succeed silicon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Eternity While I was tempted to respond with a very technical explanation...These are two completlely different industries that shouldn't be compared.  One has massive R&D budget compared to production, leading to a monopolistic market, and the other is nicely balanced between many costs making for a more competitive marketplace.  AMD catching up either means they have to spend more money or be a lot (A LOT) smarter with their money, either way, it's kind of just throwing money at a problem (which isn't technically great, even if it provides an alternative, there are better alternatives that government won't touch with a 10 foot pole).  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2010 10:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Defective graphene sheets look poised to succeed silicon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</guid><description><![CDATA[@juanvaldez  I am going to take your word on that as I am not well versed in Economics Fu.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shaka]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2010 10:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Defective graphene sheets look poised to succeed silicon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</guid><description><![CDATA[say hello to the next paradigm shift]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[babydill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2010 9:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Defective graphene sheets look poised to succeed silicon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</guid><description><![CDATA[Holy jeebus!  I go to USF and Oleynik was my professor in Eng Physics II.. smart guy!  USF has a lot of good materials research going on; I feel weird typing this on Engadget.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brownsound279]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2010 9:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Defective graphene sheets look poised to succeed silicon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</guid><description><![CDATA[Another 20 years and I'll be running a 200 Core Graphene AMD-Inside processor.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ignition1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2010 9:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Defective graphene sheets look poised to succeed silicon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ignition1 <br><br>In my iPhone! :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ignition1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2010 9:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Defective graphene sheets look poised to succeed silicon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ignition1  In your MicroPalmDroid iLife 1337 series 8G 2EB *lists countless other arbitrary specs*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JRK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2010 9:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Defective graphene sheets look poised to succeed silicon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ignition1  <br><br>I hope you realize that in 20 years the iPhone will be about as relevant to your daily life as Windows 3.0 is to people today.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[engadget]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2010 12:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Defective graphene sheets look poised to succeed silicon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</guid><description><![CDATA[@JRKScope <br><br>8GB? 20 years...more like 8TB. Lol.<br><br>But yes...who knows what'll happen in 20 years? I wish I had a time machine.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ignition1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2010 1:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Defective graphene sheets look poised to succeed silicon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</guid><description><![CDATA[wow. you guys are really intense. working on good friday XD]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[oringal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2010 9:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Defective graphene sheets look poised to succeed silicon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</guid><description><![CDATA[@oringal <br><br>They did it for Christmas.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bigjaydogg3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2010 9:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Defective graphene sheets look poised to succeed silicon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</guid><description><![CDATA[@oringal It's not like nerds have social lives. What else would they be doing?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Parody of a Microtard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2010 10:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Defective graphene sheets look poised to succeed silicon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</guid><description><![CDATA[right,  because good Friday is such a huuuuuugely recognized holiday..... /sarcasm]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2010 10:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Defective graphene sheets look poised to succeed silicon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</guid><description><![CDATA[Excellent, silicon is SOOO retro. Time to go. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nitesh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2010 10:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Defective graphene sheets look poised to succeed silicon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</guid><description><![CDATA[I for one welcome our new graphene-based masters...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[exNewt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2010 2:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Defective graphene sheets look poised to succeed silicon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</guid><description><![CDATA[@exNewt <br><br>I second this!<br><br>*bows*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kromatik]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2010 3:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Defective graphene sheets look poised to succeed silicon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wait...So what is to become of my Valley? Would it be called the Graphene Valley instead of Silicon?<br><br>Grahff...feeeen...Vahlleee..<br><br>No way!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[questionexclamation]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2010 10:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Defective graphene sheets look poised to succeed silicon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</guid><description><![CDATA[@questionexclamation<br>SF Bay will still be Silicon Valley.<br><br>Tampa Bay will be Graphene [Valley / Beach / ?].]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nekonyan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 3rd 2010 3:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Defective graphene sheets look poised to succeed silicon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/02/defective-graphene-sheets-look-poised-to-succeed-silicon/</guid><description><![CDATA[I bet you just have to press your pencil really hard to the paper to do this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2010 10:32PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
