http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/ Engadget Comments for Intel's Atom D525 to offer 1.8GHz with no bump in consumption? http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/Apr 7th 2010 10:47AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/Apr 7th 2010 10:56AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/Intel is living in the fast lane, that's for sure...]]>Apr 7th 2010 11:07AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/Apr 7th 2010 11:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/
I just can't figure out why the Atoms are so underwhelming. I love that they sip power. A power-sipping CPU and an "only on when needed" GPU like the Ion 2 is exactly what I want in my next computer, but not at the expense of non-studdering video.

On top of that, it seems like they haven't even put up a fight in giving dominant marketshare in the handset space away to ARM cores. W T F?]]>Apr 7th 2010 11:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/Apr 7th 2010 11:17AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/
Also,. I was pretty sure that while the Pineview netbook CPUs didn't offer much of a performance bump for the N-series netbook CPUs, the D5xx nettop was a performance enhancementt over the Atom 330 (both are 64-bit and dual, two traits which are not present with the netbook series).]]>Apr 7th 2010 11:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/Apr 7th 2010 11:33AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/
I'm sure Intel is kicking themselves for selling off their ARM-based embedded devices division given the number of smartphones and other devices that use them.]]>Apr 7th 2010 12:03PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/
I have set up the Zony X netbook and while it is fantastically slim and light and pretty good on battery power, it maxes out when you boot it, open an application, copy files from the network or just about anything else. Perhaps a turbo mode for when it is plugged in or you are in a hurry that doubled the processor speed would be good. ]]>Apr 7th 2010 4:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/Apr 9th 2010 6:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/Apr 7th 2010 10:50AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/
not really tho.]]>Apr 7th 2010 11:02AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/Actually, it does - very, very well.]]>Apr 7th 2010 11:05AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/Apr 7th 2010 10:51AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/Apr 7th 2010 10:52AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/
Naming convention marketing
Ramp up specs without noticeable performance increase
Consumer (OEM & channel partner) flooding

...in addition to many things I probably don't know.]]>Apr 7th 2010 11:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/Apr 7th 2010 11:09AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/Apr 7th 2010 10:52AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/I seem to recall that "until Intel makes things official."]]>Apr 7th 2010 10:56AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/
Fail.]]>Apr 7th 2010 11:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/Apr 7th 2010 11:35AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/DDR3 uses less power, which matters if you are trying to bring down consumption on a low power system. It isn't always about the 111 and !!!'s

ARM]]>Apr 7th 2010 3:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/
The Atom CPU is faster than the A4. The A4 is an integrated GPU + CPU, so the comparison isn't even valid anyway.

Atom+Ion > A4

]]>Apr 7th 2010 11:18AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/Apr 7th 2010 11:22AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/Apr 7th 2010 11:22AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/Apr 7th 2010 11:32AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/The system-on-a-chip contains the Lincroft CPU, GMA 3150 GPU and a DDR2-soon-to-be-DDR3 memory controller.]]>Apr 7th 2010 11:27AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/
Why do I keep seeing this picture of a cpu on top of a computer case? Is this the only picture we have of this cpu or something?]]>Apr 7th 2010 11:31AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/
Wake me up when your super-duper iPad joins the 21 Century and allow downloading of content off the web. ]]>Apr 7th 2010 11:32AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/
-1 for being a dumbass iFanboy.]]>Apr 7th 2010 12:06PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/Apr 7th 2010 12:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/Apr 7th 2010 12:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/intels-atom-d525-to-offer-1-8ghz-with-no-bump-in-consumption/Apr 7th 2010 2:30PM